Over the past two decades, evaluability assessments have gained prominence as a practical and cost-effective strategy to enhance evaluation readiness in health. Despite their growing use, concerns remain about their conceptual clarity, methodological rigor, and practical application. This study presents a systematic literature review to examine the evolution, implementation, and lessons learned from evaluability assessments in health-related contexts. Guided by three research questions, it investigates how evaluability assessments have developed, how they have been applied methodologically, and what insights emerge from their implementation. A hybrid approach combining bibliometric mapping and domain-based methodological assessment was employed. Findings highlight that while evaluability assessments are structured and resource-efficient, they face recurring challenges, particularly in selecting theoretical frameworks and ensuring high-quality data collection. Promising practices include collaboration between internal and external evaluators and meaningful stakeholder engagement. This review aims to advance evaluative thinking and offers an agenda for future research and practice in health evaluation.
AbildsoCGDyerADailySM, et al. (2019) Evaluability assessment of “growing healthy communities,” a mini-grant program to improve access to healthy foods and places for physical activity. BMC Public Health19: 779. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7156-8
2.
AbildsoCGShawleySOwensS, et al. (2016) An evaluability assessment of the West Virginia physical activity plan, 2015: Lessons learned for other state physical activity plans. Preventing Chronic Disease13: 160307. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd13.160307
3.
AriaMCuccurulloC (2017) bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics11(4): 959–75. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
4.
BaratieriTNicolottiCANatalS, et al. (2019) Aplicação do estudo de avaliabilidade na área da saúde: uma revisão integrativa. Saúde Em Debate43: 240–55. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104201912018
5.
BasileKCLangKSBartenfeldTA, et al. (2005) Report from the CDC: Evaluability assessment of the rape prevention and education program: Summary of findings and recommendations. Journal of Women’s Health14(3): 201–7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2005.14.201
6.
BelfordMRobertsonTJepsonR (2017) Using evaluability assessment to assess local community development health programmes: A Scottish case-study. BMC Medical Research Methodology17: 70. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0334-4
7.
BezerraLCAlvesCKReisYA, et al. (2012) Identification and characterization of constituent elements of an intervention: Pre-evaluation of the “ParticipaSUS” policy. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva17(4): 883–900. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232012000400011
8.
BoingAFLacerdaJTBoingAC, et al. (2021) Methods and operational aspects of an epidemiological study and evaluation of Rede Cegonha. Revista Brasileira De Epidemiologia24: e210010. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720210010
9.
BoodhooALouw-PotgieterJ (2020) Evaluability perspectives: An empirical investigation of programme evaluability in different practice contexts. African Evaluation Journal8(1): 1–12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4102/aej.v8i1.434
10.
BrammerWMRethlefsenMLKleijnenJ, et al. (2017) Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: A prospective exploratory study. Systematic Reviews6: 245. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y
11.
BrownRVan GodwinJEdwardsA, et al. (2023) A qualitative exploration of stakeholder perspectives on the implementation of a whole school approach to mental health and emotional well-being in Wales. Health Education Research38(3): 241–53. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyad002
12.
DagenaisCPlouffeLGagnéC, et al. (2017) Improving the health and safety of 911 emergency call centre agents: An evaluability assessment of a knowledge transfer strategy. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics23(1): 50–9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2016.1216355
DaviesRPayneL (2015) Evaluability assessments: Reflections on a review of the literature. Evaluation21(2): 216–31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389015577465
15.
DeGroffACheungKDawkins-LynN, et al. (2015) Identifying promising practices for evaluation: The national breast and cervical cancer early detection program. Cancer Causes & Control26(5): 767–74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0538-z
16.
DiasMSAOliveiraIPSilvaLMS, et al. (2018) The national health promotion policy: An evaluability assessment in a health region in Brazil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva23(1): 103–14.
17.
DurhamJGillieattSElliesP (2007) An evaluability assessment of a nutrition promotion project for newly arrived refugees. Health Promotion Journal of Australia18: 43–9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1071/HE07043
18.
DwyerJJMHansenBBarreraM, et al. (2003) Maximizing children’s physical activity: An evaluability assessment to plan a community-based, multi-strategy approach in an ethno-racially and socio-economically diverse city. Health Promotion International18(3): 199–208. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dag015
19.
EmbryVMacyRJMoraccoKE, et al. (2022) From “homegrown” to research-ready: Converting an existing practitioner-developed violence prevention intervention into an evaluable intervention. Health Promotion Practice23(6): 1063–72. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399211031540
20.
FlachDMAOliveiraMCardosoLGD, et al. (2020) Health evaluation: Health assessment for people with ostomies. Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem73(4): e20180789. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0789
21.
GreenLW (2006) Public health asks of systems science: To advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us get more practice-based evidence?American Journal of Public Health96: 406–9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.066035
22.
Hamilton-WestKGadsbyEZarembaN, et al. (2019) Evaluability assessments as an approach to examining social prescribing. Health & Social Care in the Community27(4): 1085–94. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12726
23.
HawePDegelingDHallJ (1990) A Health Workers Guide: Evaluating Health Promotion. Sydney, NSW, Australia: MacLennan and Petty.
24.
HesterLLWilceMAGillSA, et al. (2013) Roles of the state asthma program in implementing multicomponent, school-based asthma interventions. Journal of School Health83(12): 833–41. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12101
25.
HolvoetNVan EsbroeckDInbergL, et al. (2018) To evaluate or not: Evaluability study of 40 interventions of Belgian development cooperation. Evaluation and Program Planning67: 189–99. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.12.005
26.
HoneycuttSHermstadACarvalhoML, et al. (2017) Practice to evidence: Using evaluability assessment to generate practice-based evidence in rural South Georgia. Health Education & Behavior44(3): 454–62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198116673360
27.
HouseERHoweKR (1999) Values in evaluation and social research. In: WilliamsDD (Org.) Evaluation and Social Research. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 3–26.
28.
JungSMSchubertJG (1983) Evaluability assessment: A two-year retrospective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis5(4): 435–44. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ294182
LamSSkinnerK (2021) The use of evaluability assessments in improving future evaluations: A scoping review of 10 years of literature (2008–2018). American Journal of Evaluation42(4): 523–40. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020936769
31.
LamiaTLLowryGFMcLeesAW, et al. (2021) Improving outcome accountability of block grants: Lessons learned from the preventive health and health services block grant evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation42(2): 185–200. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020904137
32.
LaperrièreHPotvinLZúñigaR (2012) A socio-political framework for evaluability assessment of participatory evaluations of partnerships: Making sense of the power differentials in programs that involve the state and civil society. Evaluation18(2): 246–59. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389012442445
33.
LevitonLCGutmanMA (2010) Overview and rationale for the systematic screening and assessment method. In: LevitonLCKhanLKDawkinsN (eds) The systematic screening and assessment method: Finding innovations worth evaluating. New Directions for Evaluation, Vol. 125. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 7–31.
34.
LevitonLCCollinsCBLairdBL, et al. (1998) Teaching evaluation using evaluability assessment. Evaluation4(4): 389–409. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/13563899822208699
35.
LevitonLCKhanLKRogD, et al. (2010) Evaluability assessment to improve public health policies, programs, and practices. Annual Review of Public Health31: 213–33. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103625
36.
LimaLRFSilvaLMV (2008) Evaluability assessment of a health care campaign for improving the access to ophthalmologic care in a central region of Brazil, 2004. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva13: 2059–64. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232008000900010
37.
LosbyJLVaughanMDavisR, et al. (2015) Arriving at results efficiently: Using the enhanced evaluability assessment approach. Preventing Chronic Disease12: 150413. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd12.150413
38.
MacaskillLDwyerJJMUetrechtC, et al. (2000) An evaluability assessment to develop a restaurant health promotion program in Canada. Health Promotion International15(1): 57–69. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/15.1.57
39.
MirandaWDGuimarãesEAACamposDS, et al. (2018) Programa Nacional de Suplementação de Vitamina A no Brasil: Um estudo de avaliabilidade. Revista Panamericana De Salud Pública42: e182. Available at: https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2018.182
40.
NewcomerKEHatryHPWholeyJS, et al. (2015) Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass & Pfeiffer Imprints Wiley.
PaulJLimWMO’CassA, et al. (2021) Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies45: O1–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695
43.
Perianes-RodriguezAWaltmanLvan EckNJ (2016) Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics10(4): 1178–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006
SanouAKouyatéBBibeauG, et al. (2011) Evaluability assessment of an immunization improvement strategy in rural Burkina Faso: Intervention theory versus reality, information need and evaluations. Evaluation and Program Planning34(3): 303–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.10.005
SmithNL (1981) Evaluability assessment: A retrospective illustration and review. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis3(1): 77–82. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737003001077
48.
SpencerSGadsbyEOgilvieJ, et al. (2016) Evaluability assessments as part of an approach to supporting healthy weight. British Journal of Healthcare Management22(10): 510–6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2016.22.10.510
ThurstonWEPotvinL (2003) Evaluability assessment: A tool for incorporating evaluation in social change programmes. Evaluation9(4): 453–69. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389003094006
51.
ThurstonWERamaliuA (2005) Evaluability assessment of a survivors of torture program: Lessons learned. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation20(2): 1–25. Available at: https://evaluationcanada.ca/secure/20-2-001.pdf
52.
ThurstonWEGrahamJHatfieldJ (2003) Evaluability assessment: A catalyst for program change and improvement. Evaluation & the Health Professions26(2): 206–21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278703026002005
53.
TrevisanMS (2007) Evaluability assessment from 1986 to 2006. American Journal of Evaluation28(3): 290–303. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214007304589
United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG) (2016) Evaluation in the SDG Era: Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities for UNEG. Available at: https://www.uneval.org/document/detail/1912
56.
WalserTMTrevisanMS (2016) Evaluability assessment thesis and dissertation studies in graduate professional degree programs: Review and recommendations. American Journal of Evaluation37(1): 118–38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214015583693
57.
WholeyJS (1977) Evaluability assessment. In: RutmanL (ed) Evaluation Research Methods: A Basic Guide. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 41–56.
58.
WholeyJS (1979) Evaluation: Promise and Performance. Washington DC: Urban Institute.
59.
WholeyJS (1994) Evaluability assessment. In: WholeyJSHatryHPNewcomerKE (eds) Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
60.
WretmanCJMacyRJStylianouAM, et al. (2021) Study protocol for an evaluability assessment of an anti-human trafficking program. International Journal for Equity in Health20: 234. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01573-5
