Abstract
This study is a meta-evaluation, examining the implementation and adaptation of the Transformative Evaluation methodology developed by Professor Susan Cooper. It advances knowledge in the relatively under-developed fields of meta-evaluation, ‘small-n’ methodologies and the use of Transformative Evaluation, which, to-date, has seen relatively limited application across different contexts. Data were collected through interviews, focus groups and surveys with programme beneficiaries (storytellers), evaluators (story generators) and strategic stakeholders (policy makers). The study highlights the potential of using Transformative Evaluation as an inclusive, empowering methodology that amplifies marginalised voices and fosters meaningful engagement, collaboration and reflection. However, modifications to the methodology that appeared necessary to address ethical and practical challenges related to the study’s context and findings, raised questions about the methodology’s reliability and scalability, its compatibility with accountability-driven evaluation needs and the high skill level required for effective implementation. The findings have implications for evaluation practices and organisational learning across sectors.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
