CalyxCFinlaySM (2022) Improving a framework for evaluating participatory science. Evaluation28(2): 150–65.
2.
DekkerRGeuijenKOliverC (2021) Tensions of evaluating innovation in a living lab: Moving beyond actionable knowledge production. Evaluation27(3): 347–63.
3.
DiLibertoDDOpondoCStaedkeSG, et al. (2023) The use of mediation analysis in evaluation of complex health interventions. Evaluation29(2): 168–89.
4.
GerkeD-MUudeKKlieweT (2023) Co-creation and societal impact: Toward a generic framework for research impact assessment. Evaluation29(4): 489–508.
5.
MarraMOlejniczakKPaulsonA (Eds) (2024) Evaluation in the Post-Truth World. New York: Routledge.
6.
OECD (2021) Purpose and use of the guidance: Better criteria, better evaluation. In: Applying Evaluation Criteria Thoughtfully. Paris: OECD Publishing.
7.
PawsonR (2024) How to Think Like a Realist: A Methodology for Social Science. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
8.
StameN (2022) Program, complexity, and system when evaluating sustainable development. Evaluation28(1): 58–71.
9.
te BoveldtGKeseruIMacharisC (2021) How can multi-criteria analysis support deliberative spatial planning? A critical review of methods and participatory frameworks. Evaluation27(4): 492–509.
