This article argues for the importance of theory and theorizing for an evaluation in the form of a process theory of change. A process theory of change centers its theoretical attention on key episodes that explain how things worked, in which the causal linkages are unpacked. The key lies in answering why actors do what they do (and thus whether these actions can be traced back to the intervention). This theorization has three steps: (1) definition of intervention and potential contribution; (2) theorization of potential contribution pathways; and (3) unpacking the process. This procedure is illustrated with a hypothetical example.
BamanyakiPAHolvoetN (2016) Integrating theory-based evaluation and process tracing in the evaluation of civil society gender budget initiatives. Evaluation22: 72–90.
4.
BeachDPedersenRB (2019) Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines, 2nd edn.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
5.
BefaniB (2021) Credible explanations of development outcomes: Improving quality and rigour with Bayesian theory-based evaluation. EBA report. The Expert Group for Aid Studies (EBA), Stockholm.
6.
BlameyAMackenzieM (2007) Theories of change and realistic evaluation: Peas in a pod or apples and oranges?Evaluation13: 439–55.
7.
CammettM (2022) Positive deviance cases: Their value for development research, policy and practice. In: WidnerJWoolcockMNietoDO (eds) The Case for Case Studies: Methods and Applications in International Development, Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 219–38.
8.
CartwrightN (2021) Rigour versus the need for evidential diversity. Synthese199: 13095–119.
9.
CartwrightNHardieJ (2012) Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing Better. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
CooperSBetschCSambalaEZ (2018) Vaccine hesitancy: A potential threat to the achievements of vaccination programmes in Africa. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics14: 2355–7.
11.
de SouzaDE (2022) A critical realist approach to systems thinking in evaluation. Evaluation28: 72–90.
12.
EnriaLBanguraJSKanuHM (2021) Bringin the social into vaccination research: Community-led ethnography and trust-building in immunization programs in Sierra Leone. PLoS ONE16: e0258252.
13.
HussainBLatifATimmonsS (2022) Overcoming COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among etchnic minorities: A systematic review of UK studies. Vaccine40: 3413–32.
14.
KabongoEMMukumbangFCDelobelleP, et al. (2020) Combining the theory of change and realist evaluation approaches to elicit an initial program theory of the momconnect program in South Africa. BMC Medical Research Methodology20: 282.
15.
KolerosAMayneJ (2019) Using actor-based theories for change to conduct robust evaluation in complex settings. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation333: 292–315.
16.
LemireSPeckLRPorowskiA (2020) The growth of the evaluation tree in the policy analysis forest: Recent developments in evaluation. Policy Studies Journal48(S1): 47–70.
MayneJ (2017b) Theory of change analysis: Building robust theories of change. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation32(2): 155–73.
22.
MayneJ (2019) Revisiting contribution analysis. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation34(2): 171–91.
23.
MonzaniB (2018) IIED Support to the Least Developed Countries Group: Influencing Global Climate Change Negotiations—Evaluation Case Study. London: IIED. Available at: https://www.iied.org/17466iied (accessed 28 July 2023).
Peretti-WatelPLarsonHJWardJK (2015) Vaccine hesitancy: Clarifying a theoretical framework for an ambiguous notion. PLoS Currents Outbreaks7: c289.
27.
Peretti-WatelPWardJKVergelysC, et al. (2019) Vaccine hesitancy, commitment and trust among parents of young children. Sociology of Health & Illness41: 1192–206.
28.
RaimondoE (2020) Getting practical with causal mechanisms: The application of process-tracing under real-world evaluation constraints. New Directions for Evaluation167: 45–58.
29.
RaimondoE (2023) The rigor of case-based causal anlysis: Busting myths through a demonstration. IEG methods and evaluation capacity development working paper series. Independent Evaluation Group, World Bank, Washington, DC.
30.
RothgangMLagemanB (2021) The unused potential of process tracing as evaluation approach: The case of cluster policy evaluation. Evaluation27: 527–43.
31.
SchmittJ (2020) The causal mechanism claim in evaluation: Does the prophecy fulfill?New Directions for Evaluation167: 11–26.
32.
SchmittJBeachD (2015) The contribution of process tracing to theory-based evaluatons of complex aid instruments. Evaluation21: 429–47.
33.
SimasCLarsonHJ (2021) Overcoming vaccine hesitancy in low-income and middle-income regions. Nature Reviews Disease Primers7: 41.
34.
SridharanSNakaimaA (2012) Towards an evidence base of theory-driven evaluations: Some questions for proponents of theory-driven evaluation. Evaluation18: 378–95.
35.
te LinteloDJHMunslowTPittoreK, et al. (2020) Process tracing the policy impact of indicators. The European Journal of Development Research32: 1312–37.
36.
WautersBBeachD (2018) Process tracing and congruence analysis to support theory-based impact evaluation. Evaluation24: 284–305.
37.
WinwardM (2021) Intelligence capacity and mass violence: Evidence from Indonesia. Comparative Political Studies54(3–4): 553–84.
38.
WoolcockM (2022) Will it work here? Using case studies to generate “key facts” about complex development programs. In: WidnerJWoolcockMNietoDO (eds) The Case for Case Studies: Methods and Applications in International Development, Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 87–115.
39.
World Bank (2023) The World Bank Group’s Engagement in Morocco, Fiscal Years 2011–21. Country Program Evaluation: Independent Evaluation Group. Washington, DC: World Bank.
