Internationally, interpersonal violence places huge burdens on the health, wellbeing and prosperity of society. In response to a notable increase in serious knife crime, in 2019, the UK Government awarded £35 million for the establishment of 18 Violence Reduction Units (VRUs) across England and Wales. There has been limited evaluation of community-level approaches for violence, with almost no published literature on the impact of VRUs. The article presents the approaches and experiences of two interdisciplinary teams of researchers from public health, psychology, criminology, and systems change, working as evaluators of four VRUs in England and Wales. The article describes the value of adopting a whole-system approach to evaluations, outlines good practice in evaluating VRUs, and elicits challenges to developing and embedding evaluation within complex systems.
Adams-QuackenbushNCaulfieldLS (2021) The Project Level Evaluation: Commissioned Interventions and Place-based Pilots. Grant report for the West Midlands Violence Reduction Unit. Wolverhampton: Institute for Community Research and Development, University of Wolverhampton.
2.
Adams-QuackenbushNHarewoodCSojkaB, et al. (2022) Evaluation of WMVRU Expect Respect Project (St Giles). Grant report for the West Midlands Violence Reduction Unit. Wolverhampton: Institute for Community Research and Development, University of Wolverhampton.
3.
AmmenwerthEGräberSHerrmannG, et al (2003) Evaluation of health information systems – problems and challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics71(2–3): 125–35.
4.
ArnotJMackieP (2019) Scottish public health network violence prevention framework. ScotPHN Report, NHS Health Scotland, Glasgow, June.
5.
BadgerSKaurPWilkinsonD, et al. (2023) Evaluation of the Step Together programme. Grant report for the West Midlands Violence Reduction Unit. Wolverhampton: Institute for Community Research and Development, University of Wolverhampton.
6.
BadgerSWilkinsonDChopraI (2022) Tizz Time process review. Grant report for the West Midlands Violence Reduction Unit. Wolverhampton: Institute for Community Research and Development, University of Wolverhampton.
7.
ButlerNBatesRQuiggZ (2021) Evaluation of the Mentors in Violence Prevention (MVP) Programme across Merseyside – Final Report. Liverpool. Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University.
8.
CaulfieldLSWilsonSAdams-QuackenbushN, et al. (2021) Evaluation of the West Midlands Violence Reduction Unit: Phase two report. Grant report for the West Midlands Violence Reduction Unit. Wolverhampton: Institute for Community Research and Development, University of Wolverhampton.
9.
CaulfieldLSWilsonSEllis PaineA, et al. (2020) Evaluation of the West Midlands Violence Reduction Unit: Phase one report. Grant report for the West Midlands Violence Reduction Unit. Wolverhampton: Institute for Community Research and Development, University of Wolverhampton.
10.
CaulfieldLSBrooks-WilsonSBoothJ, et al. (2022) Serious Youth Violence pathfinder: final evaluation report. Grant report to the Youth Justice Board. Wolverhampton: Institute for Community Research and Development, University of Wolverhampton.
CoidJZhangYUllrichS, et al (2021) Interpersonal violence in a deprived Scottish urban area with aggregations of physical health risks and psychiatric morbidity: An ecological study. BMC Public Health21(1): 1121.
Cure Violence Global (2022) Cure violence global – effective violence prevention, cure violence. Available at: https://cvg.org/
15.
David-FersonCVivolo-KantorAMDahlbergLL, et al (2016) A comprehensive technical package for the prevention of youth violence and associated risk behaviors. Available at: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/43085
FlorenceCShepherdJBrennanI, et al (2011) Effectiveness of anonymised information sharing and use in health service, police and local government partnership for preventing violence related injury: Experimental study and time series analysis.The BMJ342: d3313.
18.
FlorenceCShepherdJBrennanI, et al (2014) An economic evaluation of Anonymised Information Sharing in a partnership between health services, police and local government for preventing violence-related injury. Injury Prevention20(2): 108–14.
19.
FoxCRalphNHarrisonE, et al. (2020) Evaluation of the Mentors in Violence Prevention (MVP) programme in the West Midlands. Keele University.
HopkinsMFloydK (2022) How prepared are we for the serious violence duty?Crime Prevention Community Safety24: 358–68.
26.
JollyACaulfieldLSSojkaB, et al (2021) Café Delphi: Hybridising ‘world café’ and ‘Delphi techniques’ for successful remote academic collaboration. Social Sciences & Humanities Open3(1): 100095.
27.
KazlowskaAThompsonAKerslakeD, et al. (2021) The Place-Based Evaluation. Grant report for the West Midlands Violence Reduction Unit. Wolverhampton: Institute for Community Research and Development, University of Wolverhampton.
Our Watch (2021) Change the story: A shared framework for the primary prevention of violence against women in Australia (2nd Edition). Melbourne, Australia: Out Watch. Change the story | Tools and resources | Our Watch - Our Watch.
QuiggZTimpsonHNewburyA, et al. (2020) Violence Prevention Evaluation Toolkit. Liverpool/Cardiff; Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University/Wales Violence Prevention Unit. Violence-Prevention-Evaluation-Toolkit.pdf (violencepreventionwales.co.uk)
39.
QuiggZTimpsonHMillingsM, et al. (2021) Merseyside Violence Reduction Partnership Whole Systems Evaluation Report: 2020-21. Liverpool. Public Health Institute, LJMU.
40.
QuiggZMillingMTimpsonH (2022) Merseyside Violence Reduction Partnership Whole Systems Evaluation Report: 2021-22. Liverpool. Public Health Institute, LJMU.
41.
ReesJCaulfieldLSBoothJ, et al. (2023) The opportunities, challenges and rewards of Community Peer research: a reflection on research practice. Wolverhampton: Institute for Community Research and Development, University of Wolverhampton.
42.
TimpsonHHarrisonRBiglandC, et al. (2020) Evaluation of the Wales Violence Prevention Unit. Liverpool. Public Health Institute, LJMU.
Van der LooRPVan GennipEMSJBakkerAR, et al (1995) Evaluation of automated information systems in health care: An approach to classifying evaluative studies. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine48(1–2): 45–52.
45.
WhitneyDCooperriderDLGarrisonM, et al (2001) Appreciative inquiry and culture change at GTE: Launching a positive revolution. In: FryREBarrettFSeilingJG, et al (eds) Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Transformation: Report from the Field. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 130–42.
46.
WilkinsonDKerslakeDThompsonA, et al. (2022) Evaluation of Three Estates Birmingham: Mixed Methods Network Analysis. Grant report for the West Midlands Violence Reduction Unit. Wolverhampton: Institute for Community Research and Development, University of Wolverhampton.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
