In this article, the authors theorize the practice of evaluation as linked to truth-telling and organizing future societies. Drawing on Foucauldian notions of biopolitical governmentality, the authors examine the origins of the field of evaluation, theorize it as a truth-telling practice that aims to control populations and futures, and consider the implications of this for a current evaluation project with transnational newcomer migrant youth in the United States. The authors raise the following questions about evaluation as a social practice: Who/what knowledge is produced in the process? What mechanisms/technologies are deployed to reason, compare, and quantify migrant youth experiences, and at what cost? What are the ethical imperatives underlying this truth-telling process? The article offers a productive critique of current evaluation practices, providing theoretical and methodological implications of this analysis, arguing to expose the politics of governance embedded in evaluation.
Abu El-HajT (2015) Unsettled Belonging: Educating Palestinian American Youth after 9/11. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AkreshIMasseyDFrankR (2014) Beyond English proficiency: Rethinking immigrant integration. Social Science Research45: 200–10.
3.
AlthusserL (2011[1970]) Ideology and ideological state apparatuses: Notes towards an investigation. In: SzemanIKaposyT (eds) Cultural Theory: An Anthology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 204–22.
4.
BajajMBartlettL (2017) Critical transnational curriculum for immigrant and refugee students. Curriculum Inquiry471: 25–35.
5.
BajajMArgenalACanlasM (2017) Socio-Politically Relevant Pedagogy for immigrant and refugee youth. Equity & Excellence in Education50(3): 258–74.
6.
BiestaGJJ (2004) Education, accountability, and the ethical demand: Can the democratic potential of accountability be regained?Educational Theory54(3): 233–50.
7.
CousinsJBRyanKE (2009) Dilemmas for educational evaluation in a globalized society. In: RyanKECousinsJB (eds) The SAGE International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 539–54.
8.
CreswellJW (2015) A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
9.
CronbachLJAmbronSRDornbuschSM, et al. (1980) Toward Reform of Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Dahler-LarsenP (2012) The Evaluation Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
EspelandWNSauderM (2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology113(1): 1–40.
12.
FettersMFreshwaterD (2015) Publishing a methodological mixed methods research article. Journal of Mixed Methods Research9(3): 203–213. DOI: 10.1177/1558689815594687
13.
FoucaultM (1994) Governmentality. In: RabinowPRoseN (eds) The Essential Foucault. New York: The New Press, pp. 229–45.
14.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane
15.
FoucaultM (1997) For an ethics of discomfort. In: LotringerS (ed.) The Politics of Truth: Michel Foucault. New York: Semiotext(e), pp. 135–46.
16.
FoucaultM (2008) The birth of biopolitics. In: RabinowPRoseN (eds) The Essential Foucault. New York: New Press, pp. 202–8.
17.
FoucaultM (2001) Fearless Speech. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
18.
FuruboJEStameN (eds) (2019) The Evaluation Enterprise: A Critical View. New York: Routledge.
19.
Golash-BozaTValdezT (2018) Nested contexts of reception: Undocumented students at the University of California, Central. Sociological Perspectives61(4): 535–552. Available at: https://doi-org.libproxy.uncg.edu/10.1177/0731121417743728
20.
GoodmanA (2015) Nation of migrants, histories of migration. Journal of American Ethnic History34(4): 7–16.
21.
HackingI (1999) The Social Construction of What?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
HamannETZúñigaVSánchez GarcíaJ (2017) Identifying the anthropological in a mixed methods study of transnational students in Mexican schools. Current Anthropology58(1): 124–32.
23.
HansonWECreswellJWPlano ClarkVL, et al. (2005) Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology52(2): 224–35.
24.
HouseER (1993) Professional Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
25.
HultqvistK (2006) The future is already here—As it always has been. The new teacher’s subject, the pupil and the technologies of the soul. In: PopkewitzTSPeterssonKOlssonU, et al (eds) The Future Is Not What It Appears to Be: Pedagogy, Genealogy and Political Epistemology. Stockholm: HLS Förlag, pp. 21–60.
26.
KuntzAM (2015) The Responsible Methodologist: Inquiry, Truth-Telling, and Social Justice. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; New York: Routledge.
27.
LindbladSPetterssonDPopkewitzTS (eds) (2018) Education by the Numbers and the Making of Society. New York: Routledge.
28.
MerrySE (2016) The Seductions of Quantification. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Plylerv. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982).
30.
PopkewitzT (1997) The production of reason and power: Curriculum history and intellectual traditions. Journal of Curriculum Studies29(2): 131–64.
31.
PorterT (1995) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
RodriguezS (2018) “Good, deserving immigrants” join the tea party: How South Carolina policy excludes Latinx and undocumented immigrants from educational opportunity and social mobility. Education Policy Analysis Archives26. DOI: 10.14507/epaa.26.3636
33.
RodriguezS (2019) “We’re building the community; it’s a hub for democracy”: Lessons learned from a library-based program for newcomer immigrant and refugee youth. Children and Youth Services Review102: 135–144.
34.
RodriguezSMonrealT (2017) “This state is racist”: Policy problematization and undocumented youth experiences in the New Latino South. Educational Policy31(6): 764–800.
35.
RyanK (2002) Shaping educational accountability systems. American Journal of Evaluation23(4): 453–68.
36.
ShadishWRCookTDLevitonLC (1991) Foundations of Program Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
37.
WebbPT (2014) Policy problematization. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education27(3): 364–76.
38.
WebbPTGulsonKN (2015) Policy scientificity 3.0: Theory and policy analysis in-and-for this world and other-worlds. Critical Studies in Education56(1): 161–74.
39.
WeberM (1978) In: RothGWittichC (eds) Economy and Society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
