Ambient assisted living technologies could support people experiencing physical or cognitive challenges, to maintain social identities and complex activities of daily living. Although there has been substantial investment in developing ambient assisted living innovation, less effort has been devoted to understanding how to evaluate the impact of ambient assisted living on physical and mental health. Taking a theory-based evaluation approach, we suggest firstly that ambient assisted living technologies rely on networks of people and organizations to function, and secondly, analysing the changing structure of networks can bridge the gap between socio-technological change and individual-level capabilities. We present conceptual arguments for taking a network perspective in ambient assisted living evaluations, illustrated with examples from our own group’s work on technology use among older people with cognitive impairments. We then discuss the different types of network-based evaluation approaches available, their theoretical assumptions, and the sort of research questions they could address.
AAL Joint Programme (2014) Final report: A study concerning a market observatory in the ambient assisted living field. Ambient Assisted Living Association, Brussels, Belgium. Available at: http://www.sbfi.admin.ch (accessed 4 January 2016).
2.
AlmNDyeRGowansG. (2007) A communication support system for older people with dementia. Computer5: 35–41.
3.
AlpassFMNevilleS (2003) Loneliness, health and depression in older males. Aging & Mental Health7(3): 212–16.
4.
AngusJReeveP (2006) Ageism: A threat to ‘aging well’ in the 21st century. Journal of Applied Gerontology25(2): 137–52.
5.
AstellA (2013) Technology and fun for a happy old age. In: SixsmithAGutmanG (eds) Technologies for Active Aging. New York: Springer, 169–87.
6.
AstellAJAlmNGowansG. (2009) Involving older people with dementia and their carers in designing computer-based support systems: Some methodological considerations. Universal Access in the Information Society8(1): 49–59.
7.
AstellAJEllisMPBernardiL. (2010) Using a touch screen computer to support relationships between people with dementia and caregivers. Interacting with Computers22(4): 267–75.
8.
AstellAJMaloneBWilliamsG. (2014) Leveraging everyday technology for people living with dementia: A case study. Journal of Assistive Technology8(4): 164–76.
9.
BearmanPSMoodyJStovelK (2004) Chains of affection: The structure of adolescent romantic and sexual networks. American Journal of Sociology110(1): 44–91.
10.
BeedholmKFrederiksenKLomborgK (2016) What was (also) at stake when a robot bathtub was implemented in a Danish elder center: A constructivist secondary qualitative analysis. Qualitative Health Research26(10): 1424–33.
11.
BliesznerRRobertoKAWilcoxKL. (2007) Dimensions of ambiguous loss in couples coping with mild cognitive impairment*. Family Relations56(2): 196–209.
12.
BrownsellSBradleyD (2003) Assistive Technology and Telecare: Forging Solutions for Independent Living. Bristol: The Policy Press.
13.
BurtRS (2000) The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior22: 345–423.
14.
CastellsM (2000) The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. 1, The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
15.
CorradaMMBrookmeyerRPaganini-HillA. (2010) Dementia incidence continues to increase with age in the oldest old: The 90+ study. Annals of Neurology67(1): 114–21.
16.
CostaRCarneiroDNovaisP. (2009) Ambient assisted living. In: CorchadoJMTapiaDIBravoJ (eds) 3rd Symposium of Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence 2008. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 86–94.
17.
DaviesR (2005) Scale, complexity and the representation of theories of change part II. Evaluation11(2): 133–49.
18.
Department of Health (2011) Whole Systems Demonstrator: Headline Findings December 2011. London: Stationery Office.
19.
DourishPBellG (2011) Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
EllisonNBSteinfieldCLampeC (2007) The benefits of Facebook ‘friends:’ Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(4): 1143–68.
21.
Eurostat (2008) The life of women and men in Europe—a statistical portrait. In: Statistical Book. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
22.
GerschMLindertBHewingM (2010) AAL business models. Different prospects for the successful implementation of innovative services in the first and second healthcare market. In: Proceedings of the AALIANCE European Conference on AAL, Malaga, Spain, 11–12 March.
23.
GomersallTMadillA (2015) Chronotope disruption as a sensitizing concept for understanding chronic illness narratives. Health Psychology34(4): 407–16.
24.
GomersallTAstellANygårdL. (2015) Living with ambiguity: A metasynthesis of qualitative research on mild cognitive impairment. The Gerontologist55(5): 892–912.
25.
GomersallTMadillASummersLK (2012) Getting one’s thoughts straight: A dialogical analysis of women’s accounts of poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Psychology & Health27(3): 378–93.
26.
GreenhalghT (2012) Whole system demonstrator trial: Policy, politics, and publication ethics. BMJ345: e5280.
27.
GreenhalghTRussellJ (2010) Why do evaluations of eHealth programs fail? An alternative set of guiding principles. PLoS Med7(11): p.e1000360.
28.
GreenhalghTStonesR (2010) Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: Strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory. Social Science & Medicine70(9): 1285–94.
29.
GreenhalghTProcterRWhertonJ. (2015) What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services. BMC Medicine13(1): 91.
30.
GreenhalghTShawSWhertonJ. (2016) SCALS: A fourth-generation study of assisted living technologies in their organisational, social, political and policy context. BMJ Open6(2): e010208.
31.
GreenhalghTStonesRSwinglehurstD (2014) Choose and book: A sociological analysis of ‘resistance’ to an expert system. Social Science & Medicine104: 210–19.
32.
HartmanA (1995) Diagrammatic assessment of family relationships. Families in Society76(2): 111–22.
33.
HedmanA (2015) Technology use in everyday activities among older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A study of changes over time and views on technology as support. PhD thesis published by the Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
34.
HeideggerM (1962) Being and Time (MacquarrieJ.RobinsonE., trans.). New York: Harper and Row.
35.
HwangASTruongKNCameronJI. (2015) Co-designing ambient assisted living (AAL) environments: Unravelling the situated context of informal dementia care. BioMed Research International16: Article ID720483.
36.
IhdeD (1990) Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
37.
IntrocasoDM (2005) The value of social network analysis in health care delivery. New Directions for Evaluation107: 95–8.
38.
JohanssonTWildC (2010) Telemedicine in acute stroke management: Systematic review. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care26(2): 149–55.
39.
JoséRRodriguesHOteroN (2010) Ambient intelligence: Beyond the inspiring vision. Journal of Universal Computer Science16(12): 1480–99.
40.
KatzMDFitzekFH (2007) Cooperative and cognitive networks: A motivating introduction. In: FitzekFHKatzMD (eds) Cognitive Wireless Networks: Concepts, Methodologies and Visions Inspiring the Age of Enlightenment of Wireless Communications. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media.
41.
Lancet (2003) Editorial: The coming crisis of long-term care. Lancet361(9371): 1755.
42.
LatourB (1999) On recalling ANT. The Sociological Review47(S1): 15–25.
43.
LindqvistEPersson VasiliouAAstellA. (2016) Activities people with mild cognitive impairments want to master – A scoping review. British Journal of Occupational Therapy79(7): 399–408.
44.
LinglerJHNightingaleMCErlenJA. (2006) Making sense of mild cognitive impairment: A qualitative exploration of the patient’s experience. The Gerontologist46(6): 791–800.
45.
LuanaighCÓLawlorBA (2008) Loneliness and the health of older people. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry23(12): 1213–21.
46.
LuoYHawkleyLCWaiteLJ. (2012) Loneliness, health, and mortality in old age: A national longitudinal study. Social Science & Medicine74(6): 907–14.
47.
MolA (2000) What diagnostic devices do: The case of blood sugar measurement. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics21(1): 9–22.
48.
MolA (2008) The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. London, UK: Routledge.
49.
MongePRContractorNS (2003) Theories of Communication Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
MoodyHR (2013) Abundance of Life: Human Development Policies for an Aging Society. New York: Columbia University Press.
51.
MortMRobertsCPolsJ. (2013) Ethical implications of home telecare for older people: A framework derived from a multisited participative study. Health Expectations18(3): 438–49.
52.
MortensonWSixsmithAWoolrychR (2015) The power(s) of observation: Theoretical perspectives on surveillance technologies and older people. Ageing and Society35(3): 512–30.
53.
MowlesC (2014) Complex, but not quite complex enough: The turn to the complexity sciences in evaluation scholarship. Evaluation20(2): 160–75.
54.
MowlesC (2015) Managing in Uncertainty: Complexity and the Paradoxes of Everyday Organisational Life. London/New York: Routledge.
55.
NygårdL (2009) The stove timer as a device for older adults with cognitive impairment or dementia: Different professionals’ reasoning and actions. Technology and Disability21(3): 53–66.
56.
Office for National Statistics (2013) 2011 Census analysis: Unpaid care in England and Wales, 2011 and comparison with 2001. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171766_300039.pdf (accessed 10 April 2016).
57.
PandorAGomersallTStevensJW. (2013) Remote monitoring after recent hospital discharge in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Heart99(23): 1717–26.
58.
PawsonR (2006) Evidence-based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London, UK: SAGE.
59.
PawsonR (2013) The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto. London, UK: SAGE.
PepperSC (1942) World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
62.
PercivalJHansonJ (2006) Big brother or brave new world? Telecare and its implications for older people’s independence and social inclusion. Critical Social Policy26(4): 888–909.
63.
PetersenRCSmithGEWaringSC. (1999) Mild cognitive impairment: Clinical characterization and outcome. Archives of Neurology56(3): 303–8.
RashidiPMihailidisA (2013) A survey on ambient-assisted living tools for older adults. Biomedical and Health Informatics, IEEE Journal of17(3): 579–90.
66.
RauRMuszyńskaMMVaupelJW (2013) Europe, the oldest-old continent. In The Demography of Europe. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 119–37.
67.
RogersY (2006) Moving on from Weiser’s vision of calm computing: Engaging UbiComp experiences. In: Ubicomp 2006, 4206. Orange County, CA: Springer-Verlag, 404–21.
68.
RosenbergLNygårdL (2014) Learning and using technology in intertwined processes: A study of people with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer’s disease. Dementia13(5): 662–77.
69.
SenA (1999) Commodities and Capabilities. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
70.
ScottJ (2000) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London/Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
71.
StameN (2004) Theory-based evaluation and types of complexity. Evaluation10(1): 58–76.
SunHDe FlorioVGuiN. (2009) Promises and challenges of ambient assisted living systems. In: Information Technology: New Generations, 2009. ITNG’09. Sixth International Conference On. Piscataway, NJ: Ieee, 1201–7.
74.
United Nations (2009) Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. World Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision and World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision. Available at: http:// esa. un. org/ unpp (accessed 11 December 2015).
75.
van den BroekGCavalloFWehrmannC (2010) AALIANCE Ambient Assisted Living Roadmap, Vol. 6. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS press.
76.
VinesJPritchardGWrightP. (2015) An age-old problem: Examining the discourses of ageing in HCI and strategies for future research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)22(1): 2.
77.
WalsheK (2007) Understanding what works – and why – in quality improvement: The need for theory-driven evaluation. International Journal for Quality in Health Care19(2): 57–9.
78.
WeisbrotM (1999) The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American265(3): 94–104.
79.
WernerPKorczynAD (2008) Mild cognitive impairment: Conceptual, assessment, ethical, and social issues. Clinical Interventions in Aging3(3): 413–20.
