Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Kushner
S
(2002 ) I’ll Take Mine Neat: Multiple Methods but a Single Methodology . Evaluation 8 (2 ): 249 –58 .
2.
Simons
H
(2004 ) Utilizing Evaluation Evidence to Enhance Professional Practice . Evaluation 10 (4 ): 410 –29 .
3.
Simons
H
(2015 ) Interpret in context: Generalizing from the single case in . Evaluation 21 (2 ): 173 –88 .
4.
Bohni Nielsen
S
Winther
DM
(2014 ) A Nordic evaluation tradition? A look at the peer-reviewed evaluation literature . Evaluation 20 (3 ): 311 –31 .
5.
Broadie
A
(2012 ) The Scottish Enlightenment . Edinburgh : Berlinn .
6.
Broadie
A
(ed.) (2010 ) The Scottish Enlightenment: An Anthology . Edinburgh : Canongate .
7.
Forss
K
Rebien
C
(2014 ) Is there a Nordic/Scandinavian tradition? Evaluation 20 (4 ): 467 –70 .
8.
House
ER
(2015 ) Evaluating: Values, Biases, and Practical Wisdom . Charlotte, NC : Information Age Publishing .
9.
Karlsson
O
(2001 ) Critical dialogue: Its value and meaning . Evaluation 7 (2 ): 211 –27 .
10.
Norris
N
(2015 ) Democratic evaluation: The work and ideas of Barry MacDonald . Evaluation 21 (2 ): 135 –42 .
11.
Picciotto
R
(2015 ) Democratic evaluation for the 21st century . Evaluation 21 (2 ): 150 –66 .
12.
Simons
H
Greene
J
(2014 ) Against the odds, but worth it: Democratic evaluation . European Evaluation Society , Dublin , 3 October .
13.
Stame
NA
(2013 ) European evaluation theory tree . In:
Alkin
MC
(ed.) Evaluation Roots , 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA : SAGE , 355 –70 .