Reconstructing professional ethics and responsibility: Implications of critical systems thinking

Alkin MC Vo A Christie C (2012) The evaluator’s role in valuing: Who and with whom. In: Julnes G (ed.), Promoting Valuation in the Public Interest: Informing Policies for Judging Value in Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation 133. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 29–42.

Cullen AE Coryn CLS Rugh J (2011) The politics and consequences of including stakeholders in international development evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation 32: 345–61.

Davidson EJ (2005) Evaluation Methodology Basics: The Nuts and Bolts of Sound Evaluation. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

Dzur AW (2008) Democratic Professionalism. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Fischer F (1990) Technology and the Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

Fischer F (2000) Citizens, Experts, and the Environment. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Julnes G (2012) Developing policies to support valuing in the public interest. In: Julnes G (ed.), Promoting Valuation in the Public Interest: Informing Policies for Judging Value in Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation 133. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 109–29.

Mancias PT (1987) A History and Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Oxford: Blackwell.

Mark M Shotland RL (1985) Stakeholder-based evaluation and value judgments. Evaluation Review 9: 605–26.

Midgley G (2000) Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology and Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.

Midgley G (2007) Systems thinking for evaluation. In: Williams B Iman I (eds), Systems Concepts in Evaluation: An Expert Anthology. Point Reyes, CA: Edge Press.

Midgley G Pinzón LA (2013) Systemic mediation: Moral reasoning and boundaries of concern. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 30: 607–32.

Midgley G Munlo I Brown M (1998) The theory and practice of boundary critique: Developing housing services for older people. Journal of the Operational Research Society 49: 467–78.

Reynolds M (2014) Equity-focused developmental evaluation using critical systems thinking. Evaluation 20: 75–95.

Schwandt TA (2002) Evaluation Practice Reconsidered. New York: Peter Lang.

Schwandt TA (2008) Educating for intelligent belief in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation 29: 139–50.

Schwandt TA (2015) Evaluation Foundations Revisited: Cultivating a Life of the Mind for Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Scriven M (1994) The final synthesis. Evaluation Practice 15: 367–82.

Stake RE Schwandt TA (2006) On discerning quality in evaluation. In: Shaw I Greene JC Mark M (eds), Handbook of Evaluation. London: SAGE, 404–18.

Stake RE Migotsky C Davis R Cisneros EJ Depaul G Dunbar C (1997) The evolving synthesis of program value. Evaluation Practice 18: 89–103.

Stern E (1995) Editorial. Evaluation 1: 5–9.

Stern E Stame N Mayne J Forss K Davies R Befani B (2012) Broadening the range of designs and methods for impact evaluations. Working Paper 38. London: Department for International Development. Available at: http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/Output/189575/Default.aspx

Sullivan W (1995) Work and Integrity: The Crisis and Promise of Professionalism in America. New York: Harper Collins.

Sullivan W (2004) Can professionalism still be a viable ethic? The Good Society 13(1): 15–20.

Ulrich W (2000) Reflective practice in the civil society: The contribution of critically systemic thinking. Reflective Practice 1: 247–68.

Ulrich W Reynolds M (2010) Critical systems heuristics. In: Reynolds M Holwell S (eds), Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide. London: Springer.

Wadsworth Y (1997) Everyday Evaluation on the Run, 2nd edn. St. Leonards NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

Wagner P Wittrock B Whitley R (eds) (1991) Discourses on Society: The Shaping of the Social science Disciplines. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Williams B (2015) Prosaic or profound? The adoption of systems ideas by impact evaluation. IDS Bulletin 46(1): 7–16.

Zarefsky D (2014) Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation. New York: Springer.