Investment subsidies are the most popular means of public support for enterprises. However, evaluation studies measuring their net effect suggest that their effectiveness is highly debatable. The social mechanism of investment subsidies has been investigated in the article with a flexible, abductive methodological approach. Both methodological and data source triangulations have been applied: qualitative and quantitative methods deployed; and viewpoints of manifold groups (policy-makers, beneficiaries, journalists) reconstructed. The article goes beyond previous findings indicating the small net effects of intervention by investigating the social mechanism accounting for the size of the effects. It also indicates that the permanency of the programme may be explained by the analysis of the programme theories of stakeholders involved in implementation.
AnacikAKrupnikSSkrzyńskaJSzklarczykDUhlHOtrębaA (2009) Diagnoza stanu rozwoju sektorowego dialogu społecznego w skali ogólnopolskiej [Diagnosis of sectoral social dialogue in Poland]. Krakow: Tischner European University.
2.
BergströmF (2000) Capital subsidies and the performance of firms. Small Business Economics14(3): 183–93.
3.
BoudonR (1981) The Logic of Social Action. London: Routledge.
4.
BryantA (2009) Grounded theory and pragmatism: the curious case of Anselm Strauss. FORUM: Qualitative Social Research10(3), Art.2. URL (consulted 13 September 2011): http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs090325
5.
BungeM (2004) How does it work?: the search for explanatory mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences34(2): 182–210.
6.
ChenHT (1990) Theory Driven Evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
7.
CommunitiesCo (2009) State Aid Scoreboard. Autumn 2009 Update: COM(2009) 661, 07.12.2009. Brussels: European Commission.
8.
FevreR (2003) The New Sociology of Economic Behaviour. London: SAGE.
9.
GabrieleRZamarianMZaninottoE (2006) Assessing the Economic Impact of Public Industrial Policies. Trento: Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento.
10.
GoodinREReinMMoranM (2006) The public and its policies. In: MoranMReinMGoodinRE (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
GreskovitsB (1998) The Political Economy of Protest and Patience: East Europe and Latin American Transformations Compared. Budapest: CEU Press.
12.
HedströmPSwedbergR (1998) Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
KrupnikS (2008) Działanie prorozwojowe? Studium działania 2.3 SPO WKP z wykorzystaniem ewaluacji opartej na teorii programu i analizy efektu netto [Pro-developmental measure? The Study of Measure 2.3. of Sectoral Operational Programme ‘Improvement of the Competitiveness of Enterprises’ with the Usage of Theory Driven Evaluation and Analysis of Net Effect]. Krakow: Tischner European University.
14.
Levin-RozalisM (2000) Abduction, a logical criterion for program evaluation. Evaluation6(4): 411–28.
15.
Levin-RozalisM (2004) Re-visited: a tracer study ten years later. Detective process. Journal of Early Childhood Research2(3): 271–96.
16.
Levin-RozalisM (2009) Using abductive research logic: ‘the logic of discovery’, to construct a rigorous explanation of amorphous evaluation findings. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation6(13): 11–24.
17.
PawsonR (2006) Evidence Based Policy. A Realist Perspective. London: SAGE.
PeirceCS (1878) How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly12: 286–302.
20.
PokorskiJ (2010) Ocena instrumentów wsparcia bezpośredniego przedsiębiorstw. Podsumowanie wyników ewaluacji wybranych Działań SPO WKP [Evaluation of Measures of Direct Support for Enterprises. Summary of Evaluations’ Results of Chosen Measures of Sectoral Operational Programme ‘Improvement of the Competitiveness of Enterprises’]. Warsaw: Polish Agency for Enterprise Development.
21.
Polish Agency for Enterprise Development (2007) Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Poland in 2005–2006. Warsaw. URL: http://en.parp.gov.pl/files/214/2677.pdf
22.
ReichertzJ (2007) Abduction: the logic of discovery of grounded theory. In: BryantACharmazK (eds) SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: SAGE, 214–28.
23.
RigneyD (2010) The Matthew Effect: How Advantage Begets Further Advantage. New York: Columbia University Press
24.
RogersP (2005) Program theory: not whether programs work but how they work. In: SternE (ed.), Evaluation Research Methods, Vol. 3. London: SAGE.
25.
Sektorowy Program Operacyjny Wzrost Konkurencyjności Przedsiębiorstw, lata 2004–2006, (2004) Załącznik do rozporządzenia Ministra Gospodarki i Pracy z dnia 1 lipca 2004 r (Dz.U. Nr 166,Poz.1744). [Sectoral Operational Programme ‘Improvement of the Competitiveness of Enterprises’ in 2004–2006, Attachment to Regulation of Minister of Economy and Labour, 01.07.2004]. URL (consulted 13 September 2011): http://www.funduszestrukturalne.gov.pl/English/SOP+improvement+of+the+competitiveness+of+enterprises
26.
StraussAGlaserB (1967) Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Transaction.
27.
StrűbingJ (2007) Research as pragmatic problem-solving: the pragmatist roots of empirically-grounded theorizing. In: BryantACharmazK (eds), SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: SAGE, 580–602.
28.
ThomasPK (2007) Investment Incentives. Growing Use, Uncertain Benefits, Uneven Controls. Geneva: The Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) of the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD).
29.
TrainorMHarrisR (2005) Capital subsidies and their impact on total factor productivity: firm-level evidence from Northern Ireland. Journal of Regional Science45(1): 49–74.
30.
VenetoklisT (2000a) Impact of Business Subsidies on Growth of firms – Preliminary Evidence from Finnish Panel Data. Helsinki: Goverment Institute for Economic Research.
VirtanenPUusikylaP (2004) Exploring the missing links between cause and effect: a conceptual framework for understanding micro-macro conversions in programme evaluation. Evaluation1(10): 77–91.
33.
YuC (1994) Abduction? Deduction? Induction? Is there a logic of exploratory data analysis?Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana. URL (consulted 13 September 2011).
