What follows is an evaluation of the definitions and methods of evaluation that can be developed into an evaluation strategy. The strategy is derived from the use of a case-study research methodology applied to a UK postgraduate multi-disciplinary Programme in Community Mental Health. This chosen methodology is coupled with a model adapted from the training literature in an attempt to critically review how the strategy might be applied in practice.
Bhola, H. S. (1998) ‘Constructivist Capacity Building and Systemic Evaluation of Adult Basic Education and Training in South Africa’, Evaluation4(3) 329–350.
2.
Bramley, P. (1996) Evaluating Training. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.
3.
Campbell, D. T. and J. C. Stanley (1963) Experimental and Quasi-experimental Design for Research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally and Company.
4.
Chambers, D. E. , K. R. Wedel and M. K. Rodwell (1992) Evaluating Social Porgrammes. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
5.
Chen, H. T. (1996) ‘A Comprehensive Typology for Programme Evaluation’, Evaluation Practice17(2): 121–130.
6.
Clarke, A. (1999) Evaluation Research: An Introduction to Principles, Methods and Practice. London: Sage.
7.
Cook, T. D. and C. S. Reichardt (1979) Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8.
Cronbach, L. and Associates (1980) ‘Toward Reform of Programme Evaluation’, in R. Stake (1995) The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1998) Modernizing Local Government. London: HMSO.
10.
Department of Health (1998a) Modernizing Mental Health Services: Safe, Sound and Supportive. London: HMSO.
11.
Department of Health (1998b) Modernizing Social Services, Government White Paper Cm 4169. London: HMSO.
12.
Dickmeyer, N. (1989) ‘Metaphor, Model and Theory in Education Research’, Teachers College Record21(2): 151–160.
13.
Dixon, N. M. (1996) ‘New Routes to Evaluation’, Training and Development Journal May: 82–85.
14.
Fetterman, D. M. (1994) ‘Empowerment Evaluation’, Evaluation Practice15(1): 1–15.
15.
Georgenson, D. L. (1982) ‘The Problem of Transfer Calls for Partnership’, Training and Development Journal36(10): 75–78.
16.
Guba, E. G. and Y. S Lincoln (1992) Effective Evaluation: Improving the Usefulness of Evaluation Results through Responsiveness and Naturalistic Approaches. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Honey, P. and A. Mumford (1992) Manual of Learning Styles. Maidenhead: Honey.
18.
Lincoln, Y. S. and E. G. Guba (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Lincoln, Y. S. and E. G. Guba (1986) ‘Research, Evaluation and Policy Analysis: Heuristics for Disciplined Inquiry’, Policy Studies Review5: 546–565.
20.
Love, A. (1991) Internal Evaluation. London: Sage.
21.
McKenzie, J. , S. Sheely and K. Twigwell (1998) ‘Drawing on Experience: An Holistic Approach to Student Evaluation of Courses’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education23(2): 153–163.
22.
Mark, M. M. and T. D. Cook (1984) ‘Design of Randomized Experiments and Quasi Experiments’ in L. Rutman (ed.) Evaluation Research Methods: A Basic Guide, 2nd edn. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
Mathison, S. (1994) ‘Rethinking the Evalutor Role: Partnerships between Organization and Evaluators’, Evaluation and Programme Planning17(3): 299–304.
24.
Miles, M. B. and A. M. Huberman (1984) Qualitative Data Analyisis. London: Sage.
25.
Norris, N. (1990) Understanding Educational Evaluation. London: Kogan Page.
26.
Patton, M. Q. (1982) Practical Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27.
Patton, M. Q. (1986) Utilization-focused Evaluation, 2nd edn. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
Patton, M. Q. (1987) How to use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Patton, M. Q. (1996) ‘A World Larger than Formative and Summative’, Evaluation Practice17(2): 131–144.
30.
Pearce, I. D. (1995) The Assessment and Evaluation of Training: A Practical Guide. Hitchin: Technical Communications Publishing Ltd.
31.
Peryer, A. (1996) in Department of Health (1997) Get Going: A Guide to the Evaluation of Training. Milton Keynes: Joint Initiative for Community Care.
32.
Phillips, J. (1996) ‘Was it the Training?’, Training and Development Journal March: 28–32.
33.
Prior, J. (ed.) (1994) Gower Handbook of Training and Development, 2nd edn. Aldershot: Gower.
34.
Richards, G. and W. Horder (1999) ‘Mental Health Training: the Process of Collaboration’, Social Work Education18(4): 449–458.
35.
Roe, E. and R. McDonald (1984) ‘Informed Professional Judgement’, in J. McKenzie, S. Sheely and K. Twigwell (1998) ‘Drawing on Experience: An Holistic Approach to Student Evaluation of Courses’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education23(2): 153–163.
36.
Sanderson, G. (1995) ‘Objective and Evaluation’, in S. Truelove (ed.) The Handbook of Training and Development, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
37.
Scriven, M. (1967) ‘The Methodology of Evaluation’, in A. Clarke (1999) Evaluation Research: An Introduction to Principles, Methods and Practice. London: Sage.
38.
Scriven, M. (1996) ‘The Theory Behind Practical Evaluation’, Evaluation2(4): 393–404.
39.
Stake, R. E. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Suchman, E. A. (1967) Evaluative Research. New York: Russell Sage.
41.
Tyler, R. W. (1950) ‘Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction’, in E. G. Guba and Y. S. Lincoln (1992) Effective Evaluation: Improving the Usefulness of Evaluation Results Through Responsiveness and Naturalistic Approaches. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
42.
Vanderplaat, M. (1995) ‘Beyond Technique: Issues in Evaluating for Empowerment’, Evaluation1(1): 81–96.
43.
Warr, P. and M. Bird (1970) Evaluation of Management Training. Aldershot: Gower.
44.
Weiss, C. H. (1997) ‘How can Theory Based Evaluation Make Greater Headway?’, Evaluation Review21(4): 501–524.
