Barca F. ( 2009) An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. Brussels: EU; http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/policy/future/barca_en.html.
2.
Chelimsky E. ( 1997) Thoughts for a new evaluation society. Evaluation3: 97-109.
3.
Durkheim E. ( 1952) Suicide: A Study in Sociology, tr. JA Spaulding and G Simpson. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4.
European Evaluation Society (2007) EES Statement: The Importance of a Methodologically Diverse Approach to Impact Evaluation - Specifically with Respect to Development Aid and Development Interventions. London: EES.
5.
Helsby G., Saunders M., (1993) Taylorism, Tylerism and performance indicators: defending the indefensible. Educational Studies19(1): 55-77.
6.
Huberman M. ( 1994) Research utilization: the state of the art. Knowledge and Policy7(4): 13-33.
7.
Kirkpatrick DL ( 1998) Evaluating Training Programmes (2nd edn). San Francisco: Berret-Koehler .
8.
Leeuw F., Vaessen J. ( 2009) Nonie Guidance on Impact Evaluation, Inputs Activities Outputs Outcomes Impacts. Washington, DC: NONIE (The Network of Networks on Impact Evaluation): http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTOED/Resources/nonie_guidance.pdf.
9.
Mark MM, Henry GT ( 2006) Methods for policy making and knowledge development evaluations . In: Shaw I, Greene J, and Mark M (eds) The Sage Handbook of Evaluation. London: SAGE.
10.
Mayne J. ( 2001) Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: using performance measures sensibly. Canadian Journal of Programme Evaluation16: 1-24.
11.
Pawson R., Tilley N. ( 1997) Realistic Evaluation. London: SAGE.
12.
Picciotto R. ( 2004) Towards a new policy framework for the enlarged europe: investing for growth and modernisation. European Integration26(4): 475-91.
13.
Reckwitz A. ( 2002) Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory5(2): 243-63.
14.
Samicki P. ( 2009) Spech at the 6th European Conference on Evaluation of Cohesion Policy Warsaw, 30 Nov.
15.
Saunders M. ( 2006) The ‘presence’ of evaluation theory and practice in educational and social development: towards an inclusive approach, London Review of Education4(1).
16.
Saunders M., Bonamy J., and Charlier B. ( 2005) Using evaluation to create ‘provisional stabilities’: bridging innovation in higher education change processes. Evaluation11(2): 37-55.
17.
Saunders M., Trowler P., and Bamber V. ( 2011) Reconceptualising Evaluation in Higher Education: The Practice Turn. New York: McGraw-Hill .
18.
Stern E. ( 2009) Evaluation Policy in the European Union and its Institutions . Brussels: EU.
19.
Stryczynski K. ( 2008) Rigorous impact evaluation: the magic bullet for evaluation of cohesion policy?Paper delivered at the Lisbon EES International Conference.
20.
Vedung E. ( 1998) Policy instruments: typologies and theories. In Bemelmans-Videc M-L, Rist RC, and Vedung E, Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons. New Brunswick, NJ, and London: Transaction Publishers, 21-58.
21.
Weick K. ( 1995) Sense Making in Organisations. London : SAGE.
22.
White H.(2010) A contribution to current debates in impact evaluation. Evaluation16: 153.