Braudel, F. (1981, 1982, 1984) Civilization and Capitalism: 15th to 18th Centuries, 3 vols. New York: Harper Row .
2.
Cousins, J. B. and E. Whitmore (1998) ‘Framing Participatory Evaluation’, in E. Whitmore (ed.) Understanding and Practicing Participatory Evaluation, pp. 5–23. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
3.
Fetterman, D. (2001) Foundations of Empowerment Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE .
4.
Furubo, J.-E. , R. Rist and R. Sandahl , eds (2002) International Atlas of Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction .
5.
Glanz, J. (2004) ‘Scientists Say Administration Distorts Facts’, New York Times (9 Feb.).
6.
Greene, J. (2003) ‘War and Peace... and Evaluation’, in O. Karlsson (ed.) Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy2-2. Sweden: Uppsala University (www.upi.artisan.se).
7.
Hanberger, A. (2001) ‘Policy and Program Evaluation, Civil Society, and Democracy’ , American Journal of Evaluation22(2): 211–228 .
8.
House, E. R. (2003) ‘Bush's Neo-Fundamentalism and the New Politics of Evaluation’, in O. Karlsson (ed.) Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy2-2. Sweden: Uppsala University (www.upi.artisan.se)
9.
House, E. R. and K. R. Howe (1999) Values in Evaluation and Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE .
10.
Karlsson, O. (1996) ‘A Critical Dialogue in Evaluation: How can Interaction between Evaluation and Politics be Tackled?’ , Evaluation2: 405–416 .
11.
Karlsson, O. (2003) ‘Evaluation Politics in Europe: Trends and Tendencies’, in O. Karlsson (ed.) Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy1-1. Sweden: Uppsala University (www.upi.artisan.se).
12.
King, J. A. (1998) ‘Making Sense of Participatory Evaluation’, in E. Whitmore (ed.) Understanding and Practicing Participatory Evaluation, pp. 57–67. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
13.
Krogstrup, H. K. (2003) ‘User Participation in Evaluation: Top–Down and Bottom–Up Perspectives’, in O. Karlsson (ed.) Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy 1. Sweden: Uppsala University (www.upi.artisan.se).
14.
Kushner, S. (2000) Personalizing Evaluation. London: SAGE .
15.
MacDonald, B. and S. Kushner (2004) ‘Democratic Evaluation’, in S. Mathison (ed.) Encyclopedia of Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE .
16.
Mark, M. M. , G. T. Henry and G. Julnes (2000) Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
17.
Murray, R. (2002) ‘Citizens' Control of Evaluations’ , Evaluation8(1): 81–100 .
18.
Palumbo, M. (2002) Quality and Quantity in Evaluation, Social Research, and Democracy. Seville: European Evaluation Society .
19.
Patton, M. Q. (2002) ‘A Vision of Evaluation that Strengthens Democracy’ , Evaluation8(1): 125–139 .
20.
Pear, R. (2004) ‘Taking Spin out of Report that made Bad into Good Health’, New York Times (22 Feb.).
21.
Ryan, K. A. and DeStefano, L. , eds (2003) Evaluation as a Democratic Process: Promoting Inclusion, Dialogue, and Deliberation.New Directions for Evaluation, 85-85. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
22.
Schwandt, T. A. (2003) ‘In Search of Political Morality of Evaluation Practice’, in O. Karlsson (ed.) Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy 2. Sweden: Uppsala University (www.upi.artisan.se).
23.
Segerholm, C. (2003) ‘To Govern in Silence: An Essay on the Political in National Evaluations of the Public Schools in Sweden’, in O. Karlsson (ed.) Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy 2. Sweden: Uppsala University (www.upi.artisan.se).
24.
Simons, H. (1987) Getting to Know Schools in a Democracy. London: Falmer .
25.
Stein, J. G. (2001) The Cult of Efficiency. Toronto: Anansi .
26.
Woodward, B. (2004) Plan of Attack. New York: Simon & Schuster .
