Alkin, M. (2004) Evaluation Roots: Tracing Theorists' Views and Influence. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE .
2.
Befani, B. (2005) ‘Valutare la riforma universitaria in Italia: (con) un approccio orientate alla teoria’, PhD dissertation, European PhD in Socio-Economic and Statistical Studies.
3.
Brodkin, E. (2001) Reorganizing the Welfare State: New Administrative Models, Old Bureaucratic Problems, JCPR Working Paper 233, www.jcpr.org/wp
4.
Chelimsky, E. (1995) ‘Comments on Guiding Principles’, in W. R. Shadish et al. (eds) Guiding Principles for Evaluators, pp. 53–55. New Directions for Program Evaluators, 66. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
5.
European Commission (2001) European Governance. A White Paper, July 25: COM (2001) 428 final. Brussels: European Commission .
6.
George, S. (2004) ‘Multi-Level Governance and the European Union’, in I. Bache and M. Flinders (eds) Multi-Level Governance, pp. 107–126. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
7.
Grodzins, M. (1987) ‘The American System’, in J. M. Shafritz and A. C. Hyde (eds) Classics of Public Administration, pp. 319–325. Chicago, IL: Dorsey Press .
8.
House, E. and K. Howe (1999) Values in Evaluation and Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE .
9.
Hyde, A. C. and J. M. Shafritz (1979) Program Evaluation in the Public Sector. New York: Praeger .
10.
Kelly, J. M. (2005) ‘A Century of Public Budgeting Reform: The “Key” Question’ , Administration and Society37(1): 89–109 .
11.
Kooiman, I. (2003) Governing as Governance. London: SAGE .
12.
Lipsky, M. (1980) Street-Level Bureaucrats: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation .
13.
Mayntz, R. (1998) New Challenges to Governance Theory. Florence: European University Institute .
14.
Pawson, R. and N. Tilley (1997) Realistic Evaluation. London: SAGE .
15.
Perrin, B. (2006) ‘How Evaluation can Help Make Knowledge Management Real’, in R. Rist and N. Stame (eds) From Studies to Streams: Managing Evaluative Knowledge. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers .
16.
Peters, B. G. (1996) The Future of Governing. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas .
17.
Peters, B. G. and J. Pierre (1998) ‘Governance without Government? Rethinking Public Administration’ , Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory8(2): 223–243 .
18.
Peters, B. G. and J. Pierre (2004) ‘Multi-Level Governance: A Faustian Bargain?’, in I. Bache and M. Flinders (eds) Multi-Level Governance, pp. 75–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
19.
Poland, O. (1971) ‘Why does Public Administration Ignore Evaluation?’ , Public Administration Review31(2): 201–202 .
20.
Poland, O. (1979) ‘Program Evaluation and Administrative Theory’, in A. C. Hyde and J. M. Shafritz (eds) Program Evaluation in the Public Sector. New York: Praeger .
21.
Pollitt, C. and G. Boukaert (2000) Public Management Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
22.
Radaelli, C. (2004) ‘The Diffusion of Regulatory Impact Analysis: Best Practice or Lesson-Drawing?’ , European Journal of Political Research43(5): 723–747 .
23.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy, Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press .
24.
Simon, H. , D. V. Smithburg and V. A. Thompson (1973) Public Administration. New York: Knopf .
25.
Stame, N. (2004) ‘Theory-based Evaluation and Varieties of Complexies’ , Evaluation10(1): 58–76 .
26.
Suchman, E. (1967) Evaluative Research: Principles and Practice in Public Service and Social Action Programs. New York: Russell Sage Foundation .
27.
Van Kersbergen, K. and F. van Waarden (2004) ‘“Governance” as a Bridge between Disciplines: Cross-Disciplinary Inspiration Regarding Shifts in Governance and Problems of Governability, Accountability and Legitimacy’ , European Journal of Political Research43(2): 143–171 .
28.
Waldo, D. (1987) ‘Public Administration in a Time of Revolution’, in J. M. Shafritz and A. C. Hyde (eds) Classics of Public Administration, pp. 361–369. Chicago, IL: Dorsey Press ; originally publ. 1968.
29.
Weiss, C. (1997) ‘Theory-Based Evaluation: Past, Present and Future’, in D. J. Rog (ed.) Progress and Future Directions in Evaluation, pp. 41–55. New Directions for Evaluation, 76. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
30.
Wholey, J. (1989) Improving Government Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
31.
Wildavsky, A. (1979) Speaking Truth to Power. Boston, MA: Little Brown .