Balthasar, A. and S. Rieder (2000) ‘Learning from Evaluations: Effects of the Evaluation of Swiss Energy 2000 Programme’ , Evaluation6(3): 245-260 .
2.
Blunkett, D. (2000) ‘Influence or Irrelevance: Can Social Science Improve Government?’ , Secretary of State’s ESRC Lecture Speech, London: 2 February.
3.
Boaz, A. and C. Hayden (2002) ‘Pro-Active Evaluators: Enabling Research to be Useful, Usable and Used’ , Evaluation8(4): 440-453 .
4.
Boland, T. and A. Fowler (2000) ‘A Systems Perspective of Performance Management in Public Sector Organisations’ , International Journal of Public Sector Management13(5): 417-446 .
5.
Bouchikhi, H. (1998) ‘Living With and Building On Complexity: A Constructivist Perspective on Organizations’ , Organization5(2): 217-232 .
6.
Bulmer, M. , ed. (1987) Social Science Research and Government: Comparative Essays on Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
7.
Cabinet Office (1999) Modernising Government, Cm. 4310. London: The Stationery Office .
8.
Clarke, J. and J. Newman (1997) The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare. London: Sage .
9.
Commission on the Social Sciences (2003) Great Expectations: The Social Sciences in Britain. London: Commission on the Social Sciences .
10.
de Bruijn, H. (2002) Managing Performance in the Public Sector. London: Routledge .
11.
Dewey, J. (1957) Reconstruction in Philosophy, enlarged edn.Boston, MA: Beacon Press .
12.
Dewey, J. (1993) ‘The Need for a Recovery of Philosophy’, in D. Morris and I. Shapiro (eds) John Dewey: The Political Writings. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett .
13.
Dryzek, J. S. (1990) Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
14.
Easterby-Smith, M. and L. Araujo (1999) ‘Organizational Learning: Current Debates and Opportunities’, in M. Easterby-Smith , J. Burgoyne and L. Araujo (eds) Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization: Developments in Theory and Practice. London: Sage .
15.
Forester, J. (1995) ‘Judgment and the Cultivation of Appreciation in Policy-Making’, in M. Blunden and M. Daido (eds) Rethinking Public Policy-Making: Questioning Assumptions, Challenging Beliefs. London: Sage .
16.
Hatch, M. J. (1997) Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
17.
HM Treasury (2000) 2000 Spending Review: Public Service Agreements, Cm. 4808. London: HM Treasury .
18.
Hoggett, P. (1994) ‘The Politics of the Modernisation of the UK Welfare State’, in R. Burrows and B. Loader (eds) Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State?London: Routledge .
19.
Hoggett, P. (1996) ‘New Modes of Control in the Public Service’ , Public Administration74(Spring): 9-32 .
20.
House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee (2003) On Target? Government by Measurement, Fifth Report, Session 2002-03, HC 62-1. London: The Stationery Office .
21.
Lowndes, V. (1997) ‘Change in Public Service Management: New Institutions and New Managerial Regimes’ , Local Government Studies23(2): 42-66 .
22.
MacIntyre, A. (1984) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press .
23.
Majone, G. (1989) Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
24.
March, J. G. and J. P. Olsen (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press .
25.
Moingeon, B. and A. Edmondson , eds (1996) Organizational Learning and Competitive Advantage. London: Sage .
26.
National Audit Office (2001) Modern Policy-Making: Ensuring Policies Deliver Value for Money. London: NAO .
27.
National Audit Office (2003) Getting the Evidence: Using Research in Policy Making, HC586-1. London: NAO .
28.
Nutley, S. and J. Webb (2000) ‘Evidence and the Policy Process’, in H. T. O. Davies , S. M. Nutley and P. Smith (eds) What Works? Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Public Services. Bristol: Policy Press .
29.
Nutley, S. , I. Walter and N. Bland (2002) ‘The Institutional Arrangements for Connecting Evidence and Policy: The Case of Drug Misuse’ , Public Policy and Administration17(3): 76-94 .
30.
OECD (1994) Performance Management in Government: Performance Measurement and Results-Oriented Management. Public Management Occasional Papers, No. 3. Paris: OECD .
31.
O’Sullivan, N. (1993) ‘Political Integration, the Limited State, and the Philosophy of Post-modernism’ , Political Studies41(1): 21-42 .
32.
Powell, M. , ed. (1999) New Labour, New Welfare State? The ‘Third Way’ in British Social Policy. Bristol: The Policy Press .
33.
Sanderson, I. (2001) ‘Performance Management, Evaluation and Learning in “Modern” Local Government’ , Public Administration79(2): 297-313 .
34.
Sanderson, I. (2002) ‘Evaluation, Policy Learning and Evidence-Based Policy Making’ , Public Administration80(1): 1-22 .
35.
Sanderson, I. , A. G. Bovaird , P. Davies , S. Martin and A. Foreman (1998) Made to Measure: Evaluation in Practice in Local Government. London: Local Government Management Board .
36.
Sanderson, I. , S. Martin and L. Dowson (2003) Beyond Performance Management? Evaluation for Effective Local Governance, End of Award Report. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council .
37.
Schwandt, T. A. (1997) ‘Evaluation as Practical Hermeneutics’ , Evaluation3(1): 69-83 .
38.
Smith, P. (1993) ‘Outcome-Related Performance Indicators and Organizational Control in the Public Sector’ , British Journal of Management4(3): 135-151 .
39.
Smith, P. (1995) ‘Performance Indicators and Outcome in the Public Sector’ , Public Money and Management15(4): 13-16 .
40.
Tombs, S. and D. Whyte (2003) ‘Why Bad New is No News and Crime is Big Business’ , The Times Higher 21 November: 20 .
41.
Toulmin, S. (2001) Return to Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
42.
Wagenaar, H. C. (1982) ‘A Cloud of Unknowing: Social Science Research in a Political Context’, in D. B. P. Kallen , G. B. Kosse , H. C. Wagenaar , J. J. J. Kloprogge and M. Vorbeck (eds) Social Science Research and Public Policy-Making. Windsor: NFER (Foundation for Educational Research in the Netherlands)-Nelson.
43.
Walker, R. (2000) ‘Welfare Policy: Tendering for Evidence’, in H. T. O. Davies , S. M. Nutley and P. Smith (eds) What Works? Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Public Services. Bristol: Policy Press .
44.
Walker, R. (2001) ‘Great Expectations: Can Social Science Evaluate New Labour’s Policies?’ , Evaluation7(3): 305-330 .
45.
Walter, I. , S. Nutley and H. Davies (2003) Research Impact: A Cross Sector Literature Review. St Andrews: Research Unit for Research Utilisation, University of St Andrews . Available from http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/%7Eruru/publications.htm (site visited: 28 June 2004).
46.
Weick, K. E. (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
47.
Weiss, C. H. (1999) ‘The Interface between Evaluation and Public Policy’ , Evaluation5(4): 468-486 .
48.
Zagorin, P. (1998) Francis Bacon. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .