Bergman, M. , S. Cattacin and M. Läubli Loud (1998) Evaluators Evaluating Evaluators: Peer-assessment and Training Opportunities in Switzerland. Berne: Swiss Federal Office of Public Health . Available on: www.health-evaluation.admin.ch (site visited: 23 March 2004).
2.
Bussmann, W. (1996) ‘Democracy and Evaluation’s Contribution to Negotiation, Empowerment and Information: Some Findings from Swiss Democratic Experience’ , Evaluation2(3): 307-319 .
3.
Furubo, J.-E. , R. Rist and R. Sandahl (2002) International Atlas of Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ/London: Transaction .
4.
Jacob, S. and F. Varone (2002) L’institutionalisation de l’évaluation des politiques publiques: expérience étrangères et scenarios pour la Belgique [Institutionalization of the Evaluation of Public Measures: Other Countries’ Experiences and Options for Belgium].Third intermediate report of the research project AM/10/016: L’évalaution des politiques publiques en Belgique [Evaluaton of Public Measures in Belgium]. Belgium: Université catholique de Louvain .
5.
Makins, M. , ed. (1995) Collins English Dictionary. London: HarperCollins Publications .
6.
Smith, N. L. (1998) ‘Designing Investigative Evaluations: Problem Solution Versus Client Responsiveness’ , Evaluation4(2): 117-129 .
7.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2002) Institutionalizing Evaluation Checklist. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University . Available at: www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists (site visited: 23 March 2004).
8.
Swiss Evaluation Society (2000) SEVAL Evaluation Standards. Available at: www.SEVAL.ch (site visited: 23 March 2004).
9.
Swiss Federal Constitution (1999) Article no. 101.4. Berne: BBL . (Revised 18 April 1999.)
10.
Swiss Federal Office of Public Health (1997) Guidelines for Health Programme and Project Evaluation Planning. Berne: Swiss Federal Office of Public Health . Available at: www.bag.admin.ch/cce/publikationen/leitfaden/e/leitfaden.pdf (site visited: 23 March 2004).
11.
Widmer, T. (1996) Meta-Evaluation: Kriterien zur Bewertung von Evaluationen. Bern: Paul Haupt .
