International aid agencies face major problems when attempting to evaluate their achievements. Activities, intended beneficiaries, partner institutions and social contexts are diverse because of their global scale. How can agencies’ ‘theories of change’ be adequately represented in summary forms that respect the complexity and diversity? This article, the first of two, looks at a range of types of change processes and how they can be represented. It starts with linear processes, traditionally represented via the Logical Framework, and ends with network processes. The solutions proposed are informed by three related cross-disciplinary theoretical perspectives: evolutionary theory; complex adaptive systems; and social network analysis. Examples draw on the author’s consultancy experience with international development aid programmes in Vietnam, Bangladesh, Cameroon and Burkina Faso.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ashby, W. R. (1956) Introduction to Cybernetics. New York: Wiley .
Baum, J. A. C. and J. V. Singh (1994) ‘Organisational Hierarchies and Evolutionary Processes: Some Reflections on a Theory of Organizational Evolution’, in J. A. C. Baum and J. V. Singh (eds) Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations, pp. 3–20. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
4.
Bennett, C. F. (1975) ‘Up the Hierarchy’ , Journal of Extension13(2): 7–12 .
5.
Biggs, S. and H. Matsaert (1999) ‘An Actor-oriented Approach for Strengthening Research and Development Capabilities in Natural Resource Systems’ , Public Administration and Development19(2): 231–262 .
6.
Coleman, G. (1987) ‘Logical Framework Approach to the Monitoring and Evaluation of Agricultural and Rural Development Projects’ , Project Appraisal2(4): 251–259 .
7.
Davies, R. J. (1998) ‘Order and Diversity: Representing and Assisting Organisational Learning in Non Government Aid Organisations’, PhD thesis, Centre for Development Studies, University of Wales. Available at: www.swan.ac.uk/cds/rd/thesis.htm (site visited: 31 December 2003).
8.
den Heyer, M. (2001) A Bibliography for Programme Logical Models/Logframe Analysis. Canada: Evaluation Unit, International Development Research Unit . Available at: http://web.idrc.ca/uploads/user-S/10553606170logframebib2.pdf (site visited: 18 December 2003).
Earle, L. (2003) ‘Lost in the Matrix: The Logframe and the Local Picture’ , Paper presented at INTRAC’s 5th Evaluation Conference: Measurement, Management and Accountability? The Netherlands: 31 March–4 April.
11.
Eigerman, M. R. (1988) ‘Who Should Be Responsible for Business Strategy?’ , Journal of Business Strategy9(6): 40–44 .
Flint, M., C. Cameron, S. Henderson, S. Jones and D. Ticehurst (2002) How Effective Is DFID? An Independent Review of DFID’s Organisational and Development Effectiveness, Evaluation Report EV639. London: DFID .
14.
Gasper, D. (1997) Logical Frameworks: A Critical Assessment of Managerial Theory, Pluralistic Practice, Working Paper Series No. 264. The Hague: Institute of Social Studies .
15.
Gasper, D. (2000) ‘Evaluating the Logical Framework Approach: Towards Learningoriented Development Evaluation’ , Public Administration and Development20(1): 17–28 .
16.
Johnston, T. D. and A. T. Pietrewicz, eds (1985) Issues in the Ecological Study of Learning. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
17.
Kauffman, S. (1995) At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Complexity. London: Penguin .
18.
Kothari, U. (2000) Developing Guidelines for Assessing Achievement in the Eight Focal Areas of Social Development and for Assessing Outcomes. London: Social Development Department, DFID .
19.
Lavrijsen, J. (2002) Email communication, 25/09/2002. See also:www.promesweb.nl (site visited: 31 December 2003).
Nelson, R. R. and S. G. Winter (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
22.
Schelling, T. C. (1980) The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
23.
Sternin, M., J. Sternin and D. Marsh (1997) ‘Rapid Sustained Childhood Malnutrition Alleviation through a Positive Deviance Approach in Rural Vietnam: Preliminary Findings’, in O. Wollinka, E. Keeley, B. Burkhalter and N. Bashir (eds) The Health Nutrition Model: Applications in Haiti, Vietnam, and Bangladesh. Arlington, VA: BASICS . See this and related documents on positive deviance at: http://www.positivedeviance.org/pd/materials/bib.html (site visited: 31 December 2003).
24.
Surowiecki, J. (2003) ‘Patent Bending’, New Yorker 14 July.
25.
Thin, N. (1998) Social Development Policies, Results and Learning: A Multi-Agency Review. London: Social Development Division, DFID .
26.
W. K. Kellogg Foundation (2000) Logic Model Development Guide: Using Logic Models to Bring Together Planning, Evaluation and Action. Battle Creek, MI: W. K. Kellogg Foundation .
