Evaluation is being given an ever-increasing emphasis within the health service, but there is a big question over what happens to the evidence from these evaluations. This research describes three different levels of implementation for three health-service evaluations. In broad terms, the results suggested that one had influenced practice, that parts of the second had been useful, but that the third appeared to have been largely ignored. In exploring the reasons for this, an attempt is made to extend the theoretical context of influences by identifying some moderators of health-service evaluation.
CarlssonL. (2000) ‘Non-hierarchical Evaluation of Policy’, Evaluation6(2): 201–16.
2.
ChelimskyE. (1997) ‘Thoughts for a New Evaluation Society’, Evaluation3(1): 97–109.
3.
Dahler-LarsenP. (2001) ‘From Programme Theory to Constructivism: On Tragic, Magic and Competing Programmes’, Evaluation7(3): 331–49.
4.
EggersH., and ChelimskyE. (1999) ‘Purposes and Use: What Can We Expect?’, Evaluation5(1): 92–6.
5.
ForssK., RebienC. C., and CarlssonJ. (2002) ‘Process Use of Evaluations: Types of Use that Precede Lessons Learned and Feedback’, Evaluation8(1): 29–45.
6.
KirkhartK. E. (2000) ‘Reconceptualising Evaluation Use: An Integrated Theory of Influence’, in CaracelliV. J., PreskillH. (eds) The Expanding Scope of Evaluation Use, New Directions for Evaluation88, pp. 5–23. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
McCoyM., and HargieO. D. (2001) ‘Evaluating Evaluation: Implications for Assessing Quality’, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance14(7): 317–27.
8.
MartinS., and SandersonI. (1999) ‘Evaluating Public Policy Experiments: Measuring Outcomes, Monitoring Processes or Managing Pilots?’, Evaluation5(3): 245–58.
9.
PattonM. Q. (1997). Utilisation-focused Evaluation: The New Century Text, 3rd edn. London: Sage.
10.
PattonM. Q. (1998) ‘Discovering Process Use’, Evaluation4(2): 225–33.
11.
PawsonR., and TilleyN. (1997). Realistic Evaluation.London: Sage.
12.
RobsonC. (1999). Real World Research.Oxford: Blackwell.
13.
SandersonI. (2000) ‘Evaluation in Complex Policy Systems’, Evaluation6(4): 433–54.
14.
ScrivenM. (1996) ‘The Theory behind Practical Evaluation’, Evaluation2(4): 393–404.
15.
WeissC. H. (1999) ‘The Interface between Evaluation and Public Policy’, Evaluation5(4): 468–86.