Evaluators of an organization whose programmes or policies are under evaluation frequently encounter anxiety and resistance from the evaluees. Literature abounds with suggestions for developing collaborative interactions. Few studies, if any, show circumstances where the evaluees' need for co-operation and support transcends the inherent anxiety and resistance and triggers for the evaluees' desire for moral support and advice. An analysis of the socio-psychological factors involved in the circumstances described in this study may shed light on how the evaluator can develop the evaluation process to enhance the collaboration with the evaluees. Here we report and analyse three case histories of such evaluations to determine the critical features of the evaluations that made them collaborative rather than conflictual. The common issues raised shed light on practices that alleviate anxiety in the evaluation process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alkin, M. C. and F. Ellett (1984) `Evaluation Models' in International Encyclopedia of Education. New York: Pergamon .
2.
Bandura, A. (1986) `Self-efficacy: Mechanism in Human Agency' , American Psychologist37(2): 122-147 .
3.
Bardach, E. (1977) The Implementation Game: What Happens After a Bill Becomes a Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
4.
Behn, R. D. (1978) `Closing a Government Facility' , Public Administration Review38(3): 332-338 .
5.
Bernstein, I. and H. Freeman (1975) Academic and Entrepreneurial Research. New York: Russell Sage .
6.
Book of Laws (1952) Jerusalem: Government Publication .
7.
Braybrook, D. and C. E. Lindblom (1970) A Strategy of Decision, Evaluation, Policy Evaluation as a Social Process. New York: Free Press .
8.
Brehm, S. and J. Brehm (1981) Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. New York: Academic Press .
9.
Brewer, G. D. (1978) `Termination: Hard Choices - Harder Questions' , Public Administration Review38(4): 338-344 .
10.
Cameron, J. M. (1978) `Ideology and Policy Termination: Restructuring California's Mental Health System', in J. May and W. Wildavsky (eds) The Policy Cycle, pp. 301-329. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
11.
Charmaz, K. (2000) `Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods', in N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn, pp. 509-536. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
12.
Chelimsky, E., ed. (1985) Program Evaluation: Patterns and Directions. Washington, DC: APSA .
13.
Chelimsky, E. (1986) `What Have We Learnt about the Politics of Program Evaluation?' , Plenary address to the American Evaluation Association conference, November: Kansas, Missouri.
14.
Cousins, J. B. and K. A. Leithwood (1986) `Current Empirical Research on Evaluation Utilization' , Review of Educational Research56(3): 331-364 .
15.
Crocker, J. and B. Major (1989) `Social Stigma and Self-esteem: The Self-protective Properties of Stigma' , Psychological Review96(4): 608-630 .
16.
Cronbach, L. J. (1963) `Course Improvement through Evaluation' , Teachers' College Record64(4): 672-683 .
17.
Cronbach, L. J., S. R. Ambron, S. M. Dornbusch, R. D. Hess, R. C. Hornik, C. Philips, D. E. Walker and S. Weiner (1980) Toward Reform of Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
18.
Daniels, M. (1997) Terminating Public Programs: An American Political Paradox. New York: M. E. Sharpe .
19.
deLeon, P. (1978) `A Theory of Policy Termination', in J. May and A. Wildavsky (eds) The Policy Cycle, pp. 279-300. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
20.
deLeon, P. (1983) `Policy Evaluation and Program Termination' , Policy Studies Review2(4): 631-647 .
21.
Derber, C. (1979) The Pursuit of Attention: Power and Individualism in Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Press .
22.
Diab, L. (1970) `A Study of Intragroup and Intergroup Relations among Experimentally Produced Small Groups' , Genetic Psychology Monographs82(1): 49-82 .
23.
Dowd, E., S. Hughes, L. Brockbank, D. Halpain, C. Siebel and P. Siebel (1988) `Compliance-based and Defiance-based Intervention Strategies and Psychological Reactance in the Treatment of Free and Unfree Behavior' , Journal of Counselling Psychology35(4): 370-376 .
24.
Eisner, E. W. (1979) The Educational Imagination. New York: Macmillan .
25.
Flug, K. and N. (Kaliner) Kasir (1993) The Absorption in the Labor Market of Immigrants from the CIS 97 in the Short Run. Discussion Paper no 93.09. Jerusalem: Research Department, Bank of Israel .
26.
Flug, K. and N. (Kaliner) Kasir (1995) Short-Run Absorption of the Ex-USSR Immigrants in Israel's Labor Market. Discussion Paper no 95.07. Jerusalem: Research Department, Bank of Israel .
27.
Flug, K., N. (Kaliner) Kasir and O. Gur (1992) The Absorption of Soviet Immigrants into the Labor Market from 1990 Onwards: Aspects of Occupational Substitution and Retention. Discussion Paper No. 92.13. Jerusalem: Research Department, Bank of Israel .
28.
Geen, R. G. (1983) `Evaluation Apprehension and the Social Facilitation/Inhibition of Learning' , Motivation and Emotion7(2): 203-212 .
29.
Geva-May, I. (1991a) Policy Implementation Evaluation of the Re-organization of the Israeli Education System during the Gulf War (the `Flexible School' Policy), pp. 1-44. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education . In Hebrew.
30.
Geva-May, I. (1991b) Teacher Retraining Courses for New Immigrant Teachers: An Evaluation Research, pp. 1-68. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education . In Hebrew.
31.
Geva-May, I. (1991c) Evaluation Report: Organizational and Pedagogical Parameters (School Re-Organization Policy) for the Absorption of New-immigrant Earners, pp. 1-48. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education . In Hebrew.
32.
Geva-May, I. (1998) `Policy Feasibility and Immigrant Absorption in a Mass Immigration Context: The Case of Scientist Retraining in Israel' , Policy Studies Review15(2): 226-264 .
33.
Geva-May, I. (2001) `When the Motto is “Till Death Do Us Part”: The Conceptualization and the Craft of Policy Termination' , Journal of Public Administration24(3): 1-26 .
34.
Geva-May, I. and L. Pal (1999) `Good Fences Make Good Neighbours: Policy Evaluation and Policy Analysis' , Evaluation5(3): 259-277 .
35.
Glass, G. V. (1969) The Growth of Evaluation Methodology, Research Paper 27. Mimeo. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado .
36.
Graham, S. and V. Folkes, eds (1990) Attribution Theory: Applications to Achievement, Mental Health and Interpersonal Conflict. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Press .
37.
Guba, E. G. and Y. S. Lincoln (1981) Effective Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
38.
Heider, F. (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley & Sons .
39.
House, E. R. (1980) Evaluating with Validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
40.
Ingram, H. (1990) `Implementation: A Review and Suggested Framework', in N. Lynn and A. Wildavsky (eds) Public Administration: The State of the Discipline, pp. 462-480. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House .
41.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1981) Standards for Evaluation of Educational Programs, Projects and Materials. New York: McGraw-Hill .
42.
Kaufman, H. (1976) Are Government Organizations Immortal? Washington, DC: Brookings .
43.
Kaufman, H. (1987) Time, Chance and Organizations: Natural Selection in a Perilous Environment. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House .
44.
Kemmis, S. and R. McTaggart (2000) `Participatory Action Research', in N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn, pp. 567-606. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
45.
Leitenberg, H., ed. (1990) Handbook of Social and Evaluation Anxiety. New York: Plenum Press .
46.
Lynn, L. E., Jr (1987) Managing Public Policy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.
47.
McArthur, L. (1972) `The How and What of Why: Some Determinants and Consequences of Causal Attribution' , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology22(2): 171-193 .
48.
Martinko, M., B. Weiner and R. Lord, eds (1995) Attribution Theory: An Organizational Perspective. Delray Beach, FL: St Lucia Press .
49.
May, J. and W. Wildavsky (1978) The Policy Cycle. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
50.
Mazmanian, D. and P. Sabatier (1989) Implementation and Public Policy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America .
51.
Miller, D. and M. Ross (1975) `Self-serving Biases in the Attribution of Causality: Fact or Fiction?' , Psychological Bulletin82(2): 213-225 .
52.
Ministry of Immigrant Absorption (1996) Immigrant Absorption - Situation, Challenges and Goals. Jerusalem: Ministry of Immigrant Absorption Publications .
53.
Mullen, B. and C. Riordan (1988) `Self-serving Attributions for Performance in Natural Settings: A Meta-analytic Review' , Journal of Applied Social Psychology18(1): 3-22 .
54.
Nevo, D. (1983) `The Conceptualization of Educational Evaluation: An Analytical Review of Literature' , Review of Educational Research53(1): 117-128 .
55.
Palumbo, D., ed. (1987) The Politics of Program Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
56.
Patton, M. Q. (1987) `Evaluation's Political Inherency: Design and Use', in D. Palumbo (ed.) The Politics of Program Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
Pressman, J. L. and A. B. Wildavsky, eds (1984) Implementation, 3rd edn. Berkeley, CA: UC Press .
59.
Rog, D. and D. Fournier, eds (1997) Progress and Future Directions in Evaluation: Perspectives on Theory, Practice, and Methods 76. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
60.
Rossi, P. H., H. E. Freeman and S. R. Wright (1979) Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
61.
Schacter, S. (1959) The Psychology of Affiliation: Experimental Studies of the Sources of Gregariousness. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
62.
Scriven, M. (1967) `The Methodology of Evaluation', in R. E. Stake (ed.) AERA Monograph Series in Curriculum Evaluation, 1. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally .
63.
Sherif, M. (1966) In Common Predicament: Social Psychology of Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin .
64.
Stake, R. L. (1967) `The Countenance of Educational Evaluation' , Teachers College Record6(8): 523-540 .
65.
Stufflebeam, L. D. (1971) `Decision-Management Strategies', in L. D. Stufflebeam, W. J. Foley, W. J. Gephart, E. G. Guba, R. L. Hammon, H. O. Merriman and M. M. Provus (eds) Educational Evaluation and Decision Making. Itasca, IL: Peacock Publishers, Inc.
66.
Stufflebeam, L. D. (1972) `The Relevance of the CIPP Evaluation Model for Educational Accountability' , SRIS Quarterly5(1): 3-6 .
67.
Stufflebeam, L. D. (1974) Meta-Evaluation, Occasional paper, 3. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University .
68.
Tyler, R. W. (1950) Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
69.
Weiss, C. H. (1975) `Evaluation Research in the Political Context', in E. Struening and M. Guttentag (eds) Handbook of Evaluation Research, Vol. 1, pp. 13-26. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
70.
Weiss, C. H. (1983) `The Stakeholder Approach to Evaluation: Origins and Promise', in A. S. Byrk (ed.) Stakeholder Based Evaluation, pp. 3-14. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
71.
Weiss, C. H. (1985) `The Many Meanings of Research Utilization', in E. Chelimsky (ed.) Program Evaluation: Patterns and Directions. Washington, DC: APSA .
72.
Weiss, C. H. (1998) Evaluation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall .
73.
Whitmore, E., ed. (1998) Understanding and Practicing Participatory Evaluation, New Directions for Evaluation 80. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
74.
Wildavsky, A. (1979) Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co.
75.
Zajonc, R. B. (1965) `Social Facilitation' , Science149 (16 July): 269-274 .
