This article offers an interpretation of different notions of dialogue as are evident in a broad literature in the social sciences and the humanities. It sets the previous articles within this broad context while suggesting ways in which the nature, aim and methods of evaluation, as well as the roles and obligations of the evaluator, are connected to these different understandings of dialogue.
Bryk, A. (ed.) (1983) Stakeholder-Based Evaluation, New Directions for Program Evaluation 17. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Fournier, D. M. (ed.) (1995) Reasoning in Evaluation: Inferential Links and Leaps, New Directions for Evaluation 68. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Fournier, D. M. and N. L. Smith (1993) ‘Clarifying the Merits of Argument in Evaluation Practice’, Evaluation and Program Planning16(4): 315–323.
4.
Garrison, J. (1996) ‘A Deweyan Theory of Democratic Listening’, Educational Theory46(4): 429–451.
5.
Guba, E. G. and Y. S. Lincoln (1989) Fourth-Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
House, E. R. and K. R. Howe (1999) Values in Evaluation and Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Jodalen, H. and A. J. Vetlesen (1997) Closeness: An Ethics. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
8.
Michelfelder, D. P. and R. E. Palmer (1989) Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer–Derrida Debate. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
9.
Misgeld, D. and G. Nicholson (eds) (1992) Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry and History: Applied Hermeneutics. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
10.
Noddings, N. (1984) Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
11.
Noddings, N. (1992) The Challenge to Care in Schools: An Alternative Approach to Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
12.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1997) Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Risser, J. (1997) Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: Re-reading Gadamer's Philosophical Hermeneutics. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
14.
Schwandt, T. A. (1997a) ‘Evaluation as Practical Hermeneutics’, Evaluation3(1): 1–15.
15.
Schwandt, T. A. (1997b) ‘The Landscape of Values in Evaluation: Charted Terrain and Unexplored Territory’, in D. J. Rog and D. Fournier (eds) Progress and Future Directions in Evaluation: Perspectives on Theory, Practice, and Methods, New Directions for Evaluation 76, pp. 25–39. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
Scriven, M. (1980) The Logic of Evaluation. Inverness, CA: Edgepress.
17.
Stake, R. E. (1975) Evaluating the Arts in Education: A Responsive Approach. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
18.
Taylor, C. (1989) The Sources of the Self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
Taylor, C. (1991a) ‘The Dialogical Self’, in D. R. Hiley, J. F. Bohman and R. Shusterman (eds) The Interpretive Turn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20.
Taylor, C. (1991b) The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
Van Eemeren, F. H., R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds) (1987) Argumentation: Perspectives and Approaches. Dordrecht: Foris.
22.
Walker, M. U. (1992) ‘Moral Understandings: Alternative “Epistemology” for a Feminist Ethics’, in E. Browning Cole and S. Coultrap-McQuin (eds) Explorations in Feminist Ethics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
23.
Walton, D. N. (1989) Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Wolf, R. (1979) ‘The Use of Judicial Evaluation Methods in the Formation of Educational Policy’, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis1: 19–28.
