This paper considers various conceptions of competition. Distinctions are made between positive and negative consequences of participating in competitive activities and between views that competition is intrin sically positive or negative. When examining and critiquing the nature of competition the root word (com-petitio: to strive together) is highlighted. From this, it is argued that the proposition that competition is intrinsically selfish cannot withstand an analysis of what is meant by 'selfish :
The paper concludes that competition is intrinsically positive, and furthermore, that participation in competitive activities provides the opportunity to develop skills in the pursuit of excellence. Finally, the paper discusses the implications of viewing com petition as 'striving together' for teachers and students in a physical education context.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arnold, P.J. (1988). Education, movement and the curriculumLondon: Falmer Press.
2.
Arnold, P.J. (1989). Competitive sport, winning and educationJournal of Moral Education, 18, 15-25.
3.
Bailey, C. (1975). Games, winning and educationCambridge Journal of Education, 5 (1), 40-50.
4.
Baron, R.S., Moore, D. and Sanders, G.S. (1978). Distraction as a source of drive in social facilitation researchJournal of Personality and Social Psychology , 36, 816-824.
5.
Brown, L. and Grineski, S. (1992). Competition in physical education: An educational contradiction ?Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 63 (1), 17-19.
6.
Campbell, D.N. (1974). On being number one: Competition in educationPhi Delta Kappan, 56, 143-146.
7.
Coakley, J.J. (1994). Sport in society: Issues and controversies (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
8.
Dakin, S. and Arrowood, A.J. (1981). The social comparison of abilityHuman Relations, 34, 89-109.
9.
Delattre, E.J. (1995). Some reflections on success and failure in competitive athletics In W.J. Morgan and K.V. Meier (Eds.), Philosophic Inquiry in Sport (2nd ed., pp.188-192). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
10.
Dunlop, F. (1975). Bailey on games, winning and educationCambridge Journal of Education, 5 (3), 153-160.
11.
Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriouslyCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Fait, H.F. and Billing, J.F. (1978). Reassessment of the value of competition In R. Martens (Ed.), Joy and sadness in children's sports (pp.98-103). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
13.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processesHuman Relations, 7, 117-140.
14.
Fielding, M. (1976). Against competition. Proceeds of the Philosophy of EducationSociety of Great Britain, 10, 124-146.
15.
Gallahue, D.L. (1982). Understanding motor development in childrenNew York: Wiley.
16.
Gastorf, J., Suls, J. and Lawhon, J. (1978). Opponent choices of below average performersBulletin of Psychonomic Society, 12, 217-220.
17.
Grinski, S. (1993). Children, cooperative learning, and physical educationTeaching Elementary Physical Education , 4, 10-14.
18.
Groff, B.D., Baron, R.S. and Moore, D.L. (1983). Distraction, attentional conflict, and drive-like behaviourJournal of Experimental Social Psychology , 19, 359-380.
19.
Hamm, C. (1989). Philosophical issues in education: An introductionNew York: Falmer Press.
20.
Hinson, C. (1993). Children and competitionTeaching Elementary Physical Education: The Newsletter for Specialists, Teachers, and Administrators, 4 (6), 17.
21.
Horn, T. (1993). On competition: What the experts sayTeaching Elementary Physical Education: The Newsletter for Specialists, Teachers, and Administrators, 4 (6), 8-9.
22.
Hyland, D.A. (1988). Competition and friendship In W.J. Morgan and K.V. Meier (Eds.), Philosophic Inquiry in Sport (1st ed., pp.231-239). Champaign, IL : Human Kinetics.
23.
Keating, J.W. (1973). The ethics of competition and its relation to some moral problems in athletics In R.G. Osterhoudt (Ed.), The philosophy of sport: A collection of original essays (pp.157-176). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
24.
Kildea, A.E. (1983). Competition: A model for conceptionQuest, 35 (2), 169-181.
25.
Kohn, A. (1986). No contest: The case against competitionBoston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
26.
Mclntosh, P. (1979). Fair play: Ethics in sport and educationLondon: Heinemann.
27.
Meakin, D. (1981). Physical education: An agency of moral education?Journal of the Philosophy of Education , 15, 241-253.
28.
Metheny, E. (1977). Vital issuesWashington, DC : American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, and Recreation.
29.
Orlick, T. (1978). Winning through cooperation: Competitive insanity, cooperative alternativesWashington, DC: Acropolis Books.
30.
Pangrazi, R.P. and Dauer, V.P. (1992). Dynamic physical education for elementary school children (10th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
31.
Parry, J. (1978). Competitive and recreative sportBritish Journal of Physical Education, 9,68.
32.
Perry, L. (1975). Competition and cooperationBritish Journal of Educational Studies, 23, 127-134.
33.
Roberts, G.C. (1980). Children in competition: A theoretical perspective and recommendations for practiceMotor Skills: Theory into Practice, 4, 37-50.
34.
Ross, S. (1988). Winning and losing in sport: A radical reassessment In P.J. Galasso (Ed.), Philosophy of sport and physical activity: Issues and concepts (pp.56-63). Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.
35.
Schaar, J. (1967). Equality of opportunity and beyond In J. Roland Pennock and J.W. Chapman (Eds.), Equality, Nomos 9.New York: Atherton Press .
36.
Searle, J.R. (1995). The construction of social realityNew York: The Free Press.
37.
Shields, D.L.L. and Bredemeier, B.J.L. (1995). Character development and physical activityChampaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
