Armstrong, C. (1986). Research on movement analysis: Implications for the development of pedagogical competence In, M. Pi6ron, & G. Graham (Eds.), The 1984 Olympic Scientific Congress Proceedings , Vol.6 , Sport Pedagogy. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, pp. 27-32.
2.
Armstrong, C., & lmwold, C. (1982). Undergraduate training in movement observation and analysis: A pilot program In, M. Piéron, & J. Cheffers (Eds.), Studying the teaching in physical education.Liège : AIESEP, pp. 245-250.
3.
Bard, C., Fleury, M., Carrière, L., & Hallé, M. (1980). Analysis of gymnastic judges visual searchResearch Quarterly, 51, pp. 267-273.
4.
Bloom, B. (1979). Caractéristiques individuelles et apprentissages scolairesBruxelles: Ed. Labor.
5.
Caruso, V. (1980). Behaviours indicating teacher enthusiasm, critical incidents reported by teachers and students in secondary school physical education and English classesDoct. diss., University of Massachussets.
6.
Cloes, M., & Piéron, M. (1989). Identification des comportements enthousiastes de l'enseignant perçus par des élèves lors de séances d'éducation physiqueRevue de l'Education Physique, 29, pp. 7-16.
7.
Cloes, M., Piéron, M., Colomberotto, A., Baret, M., & Brouwers, M. (1988). Enseignement en situation différéeIncidence sur les réactions de l'enseignant à la prestation des élèves. Science et Motricité, 6 , pp. 31-38.
8.
Cloes, M., Zabus, A., & Piéron, M. (1991). Analyse de stratégies pédagogiques de l'enseignement des activités physiques: Influence de décisions pré-actives de l'enseignant dans l'émission de réactions à la prestation In, P. Jonnaert (Ed.), Les didactiques, similitudes et spécificités.Bruxelles: Plantyn, pp. 195-207.
9.
Carreiro Da Costa, F., & Piéron, M. (1992). Teaching effectiveness: Comparison of more and less effective teachers in an experimental teaching unit In, T. Williams, L. Almond, & A. Sparkes (Eds.), Sport and physical activity. Moving towards excellence. The Proceedings of the AIESEP world convention.London: E. & F. N. Spon , pp. 169-176.
10.
De Knop, P. (1986). Relationship of specified instructional teacher behaviours to student gain on tennisJournal of Teaching in Physical Education, 5, 2, pp. 71-78.
11.
Faucette, N., & Paterson, P. (1990). Comparing teaching behaviours and student activity levels in classes taught by physical education specialists versus nonspecialistsJournal of Teaching in Physical Education , 9, 2, pp. 106-114.
12.
Fishman, S., & Anderson, W. (1971). Developing a system for describing teachingQuest, 15, pp. 9-16.
13.
Fishman, S., & Tobey, C. (1978). Augmented feedback In, W. Anderson, & G. Barrette (Eds.), What's going on in gym: Descriptive studies. Motor skills: Theory into practice. Monograph 1, pp. 51-62.
14.
Girardin, Y., & Hanson, D. (1967). Relationship between ability to perform tumbling skills and ability to diagnose performance errorsResearch Quarterly, 38, pp. 556-561.
15.
Harari, I., & Siedentop, D. (1990). Relationships among knowledge, experience and skill analysis ability In, D. Eldar & U. Simri (Eds.), Integration or diversification of physical education and sport studies.Wingate Institute: The Emmanuel Gill Publishing House, pp. 197-204.
16.
Hoffman, S. (1983). Clinical diagnosis as a pedagogical skill In, T. Templin, & J. Olson (Eds.), Teaching in physical educationChampaign, IL: Human Kinetics , pp. 35-45.
17.
Katz, L., & Cain, I. (1985). Early childhood education, teacher for In, T. Husen, & T. Postethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education.New York: Pergamon Press, pp. 1487-1494.
18.
Kulgowczuk, R. (1994). Bases théoriques de l'apprentissage des habiletés du volley-ballInternational Volley Tech, 1, pp. 21-25.
19.
Lee, A., Keh, N., & Magill, R. (1993). Instructional effects of teacher feedback in physical educationJournal of Teaching in Physical Education , 12, pp. 228-243.
20.
Magill, R. (1994). The influence of augmented feedback on skill learning depends on characteristics of the skill and the learnerQuest, 46, pp. 314-327.
21.
O'Sullivan, M., & Burrough, L. (1989). Les effets du programme de formation du personnel sur l'enseignement de la gymnastique au niveau élémentaireJournal de I'ACSEPL, 55, 5, pp. 28-35.
22.
Piéron, M. (1982). Analyse de l'enseignement des activités physiquesBruxelles: Ministère de l'Education Nationale et de la Culture Francaise.
23.
Piéron, M., & Delmelle, R. (1983). Le retour d'information dans l'enseignement des activités physiquesMotricité Humame, 1, pp. 12-17.
24.
Piéron, M., & Delmelle, V. (1983). Les réactions à la prestation de l'élèveEtude dans l'enseignement de la danse moderne. Revue de l'Education Physique , 23, 4, pp. 35-41.
25.
Piéron, M., & Wauquier, P. (1984). Modification de comportements d'enseignement chez des étudiants en éducation physique en stage d'agrégationRevue de l'Education Physique, 24, 4, pp. 29-37.
26.
Phillips, D., & Carlisle, C. (1983). A comparison of physical education teachers categorized as most and least effectiveJournal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2, 3, pp. 55-67
27.
Pinheiro, V., & Simon, H. (1992). An operational model of motor skill diagnosisJournal of Teaching in Physical Education , 11, 3, pp. 288-302.
28.
Rolider, A. (1979). Effects of enthusiasm training on subsequent teacher behaviourDoct. diss., Ohio State University.
29.
Rosenshine, B. (1980). How time is spent in elementary classroom In, C. Denham, & A. Liebermann (Eds.), Time to learn.Washington: National Institute of Education , pp. 107-126.
30.
Siedentop, D. (1981). The Ohio State University supervision research program summary reportJournal of Teaching in Physical Education, Introductory Issue, pp. 30-38.
31.
Silverman, S. (1994). Communication and motor skill learning: What we learn from research in the gymnasiumQuest , 46, pp. 345-355.
32.
Yerg, B., & Twardy, B. (1982). Relationship of specified instructional teacher behaviours to pupil gain on a motor skill task In, M. Piéron, & J. Cheffers (Eds.), Studying the Teaching in Physical Education.Liège: A.I.E.S.E.P., pp. 61-68.