The purpose of this study was to explore the views of visually impaired youth about teacher-initiated activity modifications during integrated physical education. This experiential qualitative study included 18 visually impaired youth (ages 12–15 years; seven girls, 11 boys). Each participant completed two semi-structured interviews as data sources for this study. Four themes were constructed based on a reflexive thematic analysis of the interview data: (a) modifications interpreted as care; (b) “the angel and the devil”: modifications highlighting impairment; (c) the two-way street to modifications; and (d) modifications are Band-Aids over flawed activities and curriculum. These themes expand upon the current literature by describing how visually impaired youth understand their experiences with modifications in integrated physical education contexts. For many of the participants, activity modifications represented a tangible example of physical education teachers caring for them and caring about their needs. As such, some support for previously explicated benefits of modifications is provided. However, a number of concerns were also raised by our participants about modifications, such as modifications representing poorly conceptualized Band-Aids over poorly constructed activities, as well as modifications spotlighting differences and impairments. Finally, modifications that are promoted as simple and superficial ideas by the literature and executed by physical educators without communication with students appear to be unfavored by visually impaired students. This finding provides further support for the need to shift pedagogical strategies and teaching behaviors to become more flexible and student-centered.
AlfreyLJeanesR (2021) Challenging ableism and the ‘disability as problem’ discourse: How initial teacher education can support the inclusion of students with a disability in physical education. Sport, Education & Society. Epub ahead of print:https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2021.2019698.
2.
AllmarkP (1995) Can there be an ethics of care?E-Journal of Journal of Medical Ethics21: 19–24.
3.
AlonsoEMCarvalhoCLAraújoPF, et al. (2020) Inclusão na educação física escolar na concepção de escolares com deficiência visual. Conexões: educação física, esporte e saúde8: 1–17.
4.
AlvesMLHaegeleJADuarteE (2018) “We can’t do anything”: The experiences of students with visual impairments in physical education classes in Brazil. British Journal of Visual Impairment36(2): 152–162.
5.
AlvesMLvan MunsterMdos Santos AlvesI, et al. (2022) The gap and the bridge: Brazilian physical education pre-service training for inclusion. British Journal of Special Education49(4): 648–666.
6.
AnJGoodwinDL (2007) Physical education for students with spina bifida: Mother’s perspectives. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly24(1): 38–58.
7.
Arroyo-RojasFSimpsonACLaxtonP, et al. (2022) Ableism in kinesiology in higher education: A conversation starter. Kinesiology Review. Epub ahead of print:https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2022-0014.
8.
BraunVClarkeV (2021) Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London, UK: Sage.
9.
CharltonJI (2000) Nothing About Us, Without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10.
ChownNRobinsonJBeardonL, et al. (2017) Improving research about us, with us: A draft framework for inclusive autism research. Disability & Society32(5): 720–735.
11.
CoatesJ (2012) Teaching inclusively: Are secondary physical education student teachers sufficiently prepared to teach in inclusive environments?Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy17: 349–365.
12.
DepauwK (2020) Historical viewpoint on adapted physical education. In: HaegeleJHodgeSShapiroD (eds) Routledge Handbook on Adapted Physical Education. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 7–24.
13.
de SchipperTLiebermanLMoodyB (2017) “Kids like me, we go lightly on the head”: Experiences of children with a visual impairment on the physical self concept. British Journal of Visual Impairment35(1): 55–68.
14.
FitzgeraldH (2005) Still feeling like a spare piece of luggage? Embodied experiences of (dis)ability in physical education and school sport. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy10(1): 41–59.
15.
GieseMRuinSBaumgartnerJ, et al. (2021) “…and after that came me”. Subjective constructions of social hierarchy in physical education classes among youth with visual impairments in Germany. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health18: Article 10946.
16.
GoodwinDL (2020) Qualitative inquiry in adapted physical education. In: HaegeleJHodgeSShapiroD (eds) Handbook of Adapted Physical Education. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 163–182.
17.
GoodwinDLRossow-KimballB (2012) Thinking ethically about professional practice in adapted physical activity. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly29: 295–309.
18.
GoodwinDLWatkinsonE (2000) Inclusive PE from the perspective of students with physical disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly17: 144–160.
19.
GrenierMCollinsKWrightS, et al. (2014) Perceptions of a disability sport unit in general physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly32(1): 49–66.
20.
HaegeleJA (2019) Inclusion illusion: Questioning the inclusiveness of integrated physical education. Quest71(4): 387–397.
21.
HaegeleJABallLEZhuX, et al. (2022) Absent, incapable, and “Normal”: Understanding the inclusiveness of visually impaired students’ experiences in integrated physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly39(4): 424–445.
22.
HaegeleJAPorrettaDL (2015) Physical activity and school-age individuals with visual impairments: A literature review. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly32(1): 68–82.
23.
HaegeleJAWilsonWJZhuX, et al. (2021) Barriers and facilitators to inclusion in integrated physical education: Adapted physical educators’ perspectives. European Physical Education Review27(2): 297–311.
24.
HaegeleJAZhuX (2017) Experiences of individuals with visual impairments in integrated physical education: A retrospective study. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport88(4): 425–435.
25.
HaegeleJAZhuX (2021) School-based physical education. In: HaegeleJA (ed) Movement and Visual Impairment: Research Across Disciplines. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 47–59.
26.
HeckSBlockME (2020) Inclusive Physical Education Around the World: Origins, Cultures, and Practices. London: Routledge.
27.
HutzlerY (2020) Evidence-based practices in adapted physical education. In: HaegeleJHodgeSShapiroD (eds) Routledge Handbook of Adapted Physical Education. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 95–113.
28.
LiebermanLJBallL (2022) Visual impairments. In: WinnickJPPorrettaDL (eds) Adapted Physical Education and Sport, 7th ed.Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, pp.233–249.
29.
LiebermanLJHouston-WilsonCKozubF (2002) Perceived barriers to including students with visual impairments in general physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly19: 364–377.
30.
LiebermanLJLeporeMLepore-StevensM, et al. (2019) Physical education for children with visual impairment or blindness. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, & Dance90(1): 30–38.
31.
LincolnYGubaE (2000) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In: DenzinNLincolnY (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. London, UK: Sage, pp. 163–188.
32.
MaherAJFitzgeraldH (2020) The culture of special schools: The nature, purpose and value of physical education. Educational Review. 74(4): 773–787.
33.
MaherAJHaegeleJA (2022) Teaching Disabled Children in Physical Education: (Dis)connections Between Research and Practice. London, UK: Routledge.
Martin GinisKAEvansMBMortensonWB, et al. (2017) Broadening the conceptualization of participation of persons with physical disabilities: A configurative review and recommendations. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation98(2): 395–402.
36.
MaxwellJ (2012) A Realist Approach for Qualitative Inquiry. London, UK: Sage.
37.
MoolaFFuscoCKirshJ (2011) ‘What I wish you knew’: Social barriers toward physical activity in youth with congenital heart disease (CHD). Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly28(1): 56–77.
38.
MorleyDBanksTHaslingdenC, et al. (2021) Including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities in mainstream secondary physical education: A revisit student. European Physical Education Review27(2): 401–418.
39.
O’ConnellMLiebermanLJPetersenS (2006) The use of tactile modelling and physical guidance as instructional strategies in physical activity for children who are blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness100(8): 471–477.
40.
OpieJSouthcottJ (2018) Inclusion for a student with vision impairment: “They accept me, like, as in I am there, but they just won’t talk to me”. Qualitative Report23(8): 1889–1904.
41.
PascalCBertramT (2009) Listening to young citizens: The struggle to make real the participatory paradigm in research with young children. European Early Childhood Research Journal17(2): 240–262.
42.
PearsonHBoskovichL (2019) Problematizing disability disclosure in higher education: Shifting towards a liberating humanizing intersectional framework. Disability Studies Quarterly39(1): Article 1.
43.
PetrieKDevcichJFitzgeraldH (2018) Working towards inclusive physical education in a primary school:‘ some days I just don’t get it right’. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy23(4): 345–357.
44.
RichardsonEVMotlR (2019) A narrative exploration of an adapted physical activity space and its impact on persons with physical impairments. Disability & Society35(1): 89–110.
45.
RuinSGieseMHaegeleJA (2021) Fear or freedom? Visually impaired students’ ambivalent perspectives on physical education. British Journal of Visual Impairment39(1): 20–30.
46.
SavluikSKashubaVVypasniakI, et al. (2020) Differentiated approach for improving the physical condition of children with visual impairment during physical education. Journal of Physical Education and Sport20: 958–965.
47.
SchedlinHLiebermanLHouston-WilsonC, et al. (2012) The academic learning time in physical education of students with visual impairments: An analysis of two students. Insight: Research & Practice in Visual Impairment & Blindness5: 11–22.
48.
SleeR (2018) Inclusive Education Isn’t Dead, It Just Smells Funny. London, UK: Routledge.
49.
SleeRAllanJ (2001) Excluding the included: A recognition of inclusive education. International Studies in Sociology of Education119(2): 173–192.
50.
SmithBMcGannonKR (2018) Developing rigor in qualitative research: Problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology11(1): 101–121.
51.
SouthcottJOpieJ (2016) Establishing equity and quality: The experience of schooling from the perspective of a students with a vision impairment. International Journal of Whole Schooling12(2): 19–35.
52.
Spencer-CavaliereNWatkinsonE (2010) Inclusion understood from the perspectives of children with disability. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly27: 275–289.
53.
ThorenAQuennerstedtMMaivorsdotterN (2020) What physical education becomes when pupils with neurodevelopmental disorders are integrated: A transactional understanding. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy. 26(6): 578–592.
54.
TracyS (2013) Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis and Communicating Impact. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
55.
YardleyL (2000) Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology & Health15: 215–228.
