The limited amount of research on the influence of social status during group work in physical education has typically focused on interactions and power. What is less understood is whether social status has an impact on various physical education outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine physical activity, game performance, and knowledge outcomes of high- and low-status fifth-grade students during a physical education field hockey unit delivered utilising the Sport Education model. 44 students completed sociometric peer nomination surveys to determine the social status hierarchy of all students in the class. Students wore accelerometers to measure moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) during the unit. Pre- and post-unit game performance and knowledge were assessed through the Team Sport Assessment Procedure and cognitive tests, respectively. Repeated measures analysis of variance showed no significant difference between high- and low-status students’ average MVPA over all phases of the unit (pre-season, season and post-season), while analysis of covariances revealed significant differences in game performance and field hockey knowledge based on social status. Results suggest while physical activity levels were similar between high- and low-status students, some lower-status students were at risk in terms of developing skills and knowledge.
AlexanderKLuckmanJ (2001) Australian Teachers’ perceptions and uses of the Sport Education curriculum model. European Physical Education Review7(3): 243–267.
2.
AndersonCKennedyJA (2012) Micropolitics: A new model of status hierarchies in teams. In: MannixEANealeMA (eds) Looking Back, Moving Forward: A Review of Group and Team-Based Research. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group, pp.49–80.
3.
AndersonCKilduffGJ (2009) Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96(2): 491–503.
4.
AraújoRMesquitaIHastiePA (2014) Review of the status of learning in research on Sport Education: Future research and practice. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine13(4): 846–858.
5.
AraújoRHastiePLohseKR, et al. (2019) The long-term development of volleyball game play performance using Sport Education and the step-game-approach model. European Physical Education Review25(2): 311–326.
6.
BalesRFStrodtbeckFLMillsTM, et al. (1951) Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review16(4): 461–468.
7.
BarkerDQuennerstedtM (2017) Power and group work in physical education: A Foucauldian perspective. European Physical Education Review23(3): 339–353.
8.
BarkerDQuennerstedtMAnnerstedtC (2015) Inter-student interactions and student learning in health and physical education: A post-Vygotskian analysis. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy20(4): 409–426.
9.
BarkerDWallheadTBrockS, et al. (2017) Group work in physical education: Exploring the interconnectedness of theoretical approaches and practise. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education36(1): 50–60.
10.
BarkerDMAggerholmKStandalO, et al. (2018) Developing the practising model in physical education: An expository outline focusing on movement capability. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy23(2): 209–221.
11.
BrockSHastieP (2017) Students’ verbal exchanges and dynamics during Sport Education. European Physical Education Review23(3): 354–365.
12.
BrockSJRovegnoIOliverKL (2009) The influence of student status on student interactions and experiences during a Sport Education unit. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy14(4): 355–375.
13.
BrowneTBCarlsonTBHastiePA (2004) A comparison of rugby seasons presented in traditional and Sport Education formats. European Physical Education Review10(2): 199–214.
14.
ButteNFWongWWLeeJS, et al. (2014) Prediction of energy expenditure and physical activity in preschoolers. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise46(6): 1216–1226.
15.
BuzagloGWheelanSA (1999) Facilitating work team effectiveness: Case studies from Central America. Small Group Research30(1): 108–129.
16.
CarlsonTBHastiePA (1997) The student social system within Sport Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education16(2): 176–195.
17.
CaseyA (2017) Student interactions in the hidden curriculum. European Physical Education Review23(3): 366–371.
18.
CaseyAGoodyearVA (2015) Can cooperative learning achieve the four learning outcomes of physical education? A review of literature. Quest67(1): 56–72.
19.
ChelceaS (2005) Social Psychology. Bucharest: Economică.
20.
CohenEG (1994) Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research64(1): 1–35.
21.
CohenEGLotanRA (1995) Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal32(1): 99–120.
22.
CohenEGLotanRA (2014) Designing Group Work: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
23.
DarnisFLafontL (2014) Différences filles/garçons dans la résolution en dyade d’un problème d’ordre tactique lors d’un apprentissage sociocognitif. Actes colloque ARIS. Genève.
24.
DarnisFLafontL (2015) Cooperative learning and dyadic interactions: Two modes of knowledge construction in socio-constructivist settings for team-sport teaching. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy20(5): 459–473.
25.
DarnisFLafontLMenautA (2005) Dyadic interactions and operative level for handball strategies construction by 11–12 years old participants. European Review of Applied Psychology55: 255–265.
26.
Department of Health (2011) Start Active, Stay Active. A Report on Physical Activity for Health from the Four Home Countries Chief Medical Officers. London: Crown.
27.
DoddsP (1985) Are hunters of the functional curriculum seeking quarks or snarks?Journal of Teaching in Physical Education4(2): 91–99.
28.
DysonB (2002) The implementation of cooperative learning in an elementary physical education program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education22(1): 69–85.
29.
FariasCHastiePAMesquitaI (2017) Towards a more equitable and inclusive learning environment in Sport Education: Results of an action research-based intervention. Sport, Education and Society22(4): 460–476.
30.
GoudasMMagotsiouE (2009) The effects of a cooperative physical education program on students’ social skills. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology21(3): 356–364.
31.
GrehaigneJFGodboutPBouthierD (1997) Performance assessment in team sports. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education16(4): 500–516.
32.
GutiérrezDGarcía-LópezLMHastiePA, et al. (2022) Adoption and fidelity of Sport Education in Spanish schools. European Physical Education Review28(1): 244–262.
33.
HarveySPillSHastieP, et al. (2020) Physical education teachers’ perceptions of the successes, constraints, and possibilities associated with implementing the Sport Education model. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy25(5): 555–566.
34.
HastiePACaseyA (2014) Fidelity in models-based practice research in sport pedagogy: A guide for future investigations. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education33(3): 422–431.
35.
HastiePASharpeT (1999) Effects of a Sport Education curriculum on the positive social behaviour of at-risk rural adolescent boys. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk4(4): 417–430.
36.
HastiePATrostSG (2002) Student physical activity levels during a season of Sport Education. Pediatric Exercise Science14(1): 64–74.
37.
HastiePASinelnikovOAGuarinoAJ (2009) The development of skill and tactical competencies during a season of badminton. European Journal of Sport Science9(3): 133–140.
38.
HastiePAde OjedaDMLuquinAC (2011) A review of research on Sport Education: 2004 to the present. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy16(2): 103–132.
39.
HastiePAWardJKBrockSJ (2017) Effect of graded competition on student opportunities for participation and success rates during a season of Sport Education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy22(3): 316–327.
40.
HollettNBrockSJGrimesJR, et al. (2020) Is knowledge really power? Characteristics contributing to social status during group work in physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy25(1): 16–28.
41.
JohnsonDWJohnsonRT (1990) Social skills for successful group work. Educational Leadership47(4): 29–33.
42.
KinchinGDPenneyDClarkeG (2001) Teaching the national curriculum physical education: Try Sport Education?British Journal of Teaching Physical Education32(2): 41–44.
43.
KirkD (2005) Physical education, youth sport and lifelong participation: The importance of early learning experiences. European Physical Education Review11(3): 239–255.
44.
LafontL (2012) Cooperative learning and tutoring in sports and physical activities. In: DysonBCaseyA (eds) Cooperative Learning in Physical Education: A Research Based Approach. London: Routledge, pp.136–149.
45.
LafontLProeresMValletC (2007) Cooperative group learning in a team game: Role of verbal exchanges among peers. Social Psychology of Education10(1): 93–113.
46.
LafontLRivièreCDarnisF, et al. (2017) How to structure group work? Conditions of efficacy and methodological considerations in physical education. European Physical Education Review23(3): 327–338.
47.
LeechorC (1988) How high and low achieving students differentially benefit from working together in cooperative small groups. PhD Dissertation, Stanford University.
48.
LegrainPPaquetYD'Arripe-LonguevilleF, et al. (2011) Influence of desirability for control on instructional interactions and intrinsic motivation in a sport peer tutoring setting. International Journal of Sport Psychology42(1): 69–83.
49.
MahederoMPCalderónAHastieP, et al. (2021) Grouping students by skill level in mini-volleyball: Effect on game performance and knowledge in Sport Education. Perceptual and Motor Skills128(4): 1851–1871.
50.
MesquitaIFariasCHastieP (2012) The impact of a hybrid Sport Education–invasion games competence model soccer unit on students’ decision making, skill execution and overall game performance. European Physical Education Review18(2): 205–219.
51.
MorenoJL (1941) Foundations of sociometry: An introduction. Sociometry4(1): 15–35.
52.
ParkerMBCurtner-SmithM (2005) Health-related fitness in Sport Education and multi-activity teaching. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy10(1): 1–18.
53.
ParkerMBCurtner-SmithMD (2012) Sport Education: A panacea for hegemonic masculinity in physical education or more of the same?Sport, Education and Society17(4): 479–496.
54.
PerlmanD (2012) The influence of the Sport Education model on amotivated students’ in-class physical activity. European Physical Education Review18(3): 335–345.
55.
PritchardTHawkinsAWiegandR, et al. (2008) Effects of two instructional approaches on skill development, knowledge, and game performance. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science12(4): 219–236.
56.
PritchardTHansenAScarboroS, et al. (2015) Effectiveness of the Sport Education fitness model on fitness levels, knowledge, and physical activity. Physical Educator72(4): 577–600.
57.
Puente-MaxeraFMéndez-GimenezAde OjedaDM (2021) Physical activity levels during a Sport Education season of games from around the world. European Physical Education Review27(2): 240–257.
58.
RocamoraIGonzález-VílloraSFernández-RíoJ, et al. (2019) Physical activity levels, game performance and friendship goals using two different pedagogical models: Sport Education and direct instruction. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy24(1): 87–102.
59.
RovegnoIDollyJP (2006) Constructivist perspectives on learning. In: KirkDMacdonaldDO’SullivanM (eds) The Handbook of Physical Education. London: Sage, pp.242–261.
60.
SiedentopD (1994) Sport Education: Quality P.E. Through Positive Sport Experiences. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
61.
SiedentopDHastiePVan der MarsH (2019) Complete Guide to Sport Education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
62.
SinelnikovOA (2009) Sport Education for teachers: Professional development when introducing a novel curriculum model. European Physical Education Review15(1): 91–114. doi:10.1177/1356336X09105213.
63.
SomersetSHoareDJ (2018) Barriers to voluntary participation in sport for children: A systematic review. BMC Pediatrics18(1): 47–66.
64.
TurnerAPMartinekTJ (1999) An investigation into teaching games for understanding: Effects on skill, knowledge, and game play. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport70(3): 286–296.
VygotskyLS (1962) Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67.
VygotskyLS (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
Wahl-AlexanderZMoreheadCA (2017) Comparing campers’ physical activity levels between Sport Education and traditional instruction in a residential summer camp. Journal of Physical Activity and Health14(9): 665–670.
69.
WallheadTO'SullivanM (2005) Sport Education: Physical education for the new millennium?Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy10(2): 181–210.
70.
WardJKHastiePAWadsworthDD, et al. (2017) A Sport Education fitness season’s impact on students’ fitness levels, knowledge, and in-class physical activity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport88(3): 346–351.
71.
WardJKHastiePAStrunkK (2019) Effects of ability grouping on students’ game performance and physical activity. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education38(3): 187–198.
72.
World Health Organization (2010) Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
73.
World Health Organization (2018) Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030: More Active People for a Healthier World. Geneva: World Health Organization.
74.
WuXHartCHDraperT, et al. (2001) Peer and teacher sociometrics for preschool children: Cross-informant concordance, temporal stability, and reliability. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly47(3): 416–443.
