The aim of this study is to systematically review the empirical evidence about the sociocultural processes of ability in Physical Education (PE) and PE Teacher Education (PETE) between 2004 and 2019. Content analysis of 17 included articles demonstrated that all the studies took place in PE, but none were conducted in PETE. Qualitative methodologies were common, underpinned by a variety of theoretical approaches, such as those focused on social structures, discourses, power relations and pedagogical approaches that (re)produce social constructions of ability. Our analysis resulted in four main themes: structuring elements of the field, the able student in PE, (mis)educational consequences and practical implications. In considering findings from this study, three reflections are presented: (a) there is a clear gap in PETE literature about the sociocultural process of ability in PE; (b) understanding ability as movement literacy could be useful in PE; and (c) future research exploring how ability is socially constructed by different groups of people is needed. PETE programmes should incorporate pedagogical practices in their curriculums directed to challenge students’ views about ability, enabling them at the same time to provide more habitable learning environments in their future practice.
BarberW (2018) Inclusive and accessible physical education: Rethinking ability and disability in pre-service teacher education. Sport, Education and Society23(6): 520–532.
2.
Beltrán-CarrilloVJDevís-DevísJ (2019) El pensamiento del alumnado inactivo sobre sus experiencias negativas en educación física: los discursos del rendimiento, salutismo y masculinidad hegemónica. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte15(55): 20–34.
3.
BourdieuP (1990) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4.
BrownD (2005) An economy of gendered practices? Learning to teach physical education from the perspective of Pierre Bourdieu’s embodied sociology. Sport, Education and Society10(1): 3–23.
5.
CoatesJK (2012) Teaching inclusively: Are secondary physical education student teachers sufficiently prepared to teach in inclusive environments?Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy17(4): 349–365.
6.
CrostonAHillsLA (2017) The challenges of widening ‘legitimate’ understandings of ability within physical education. Sport, Education and Society22(5): 618–634.
7.
DomangueEASolmonMA (2012) Fitness testing: How do students make sense of the gender disparities?Sport, Education and Society17(2): 207–224.
8.
DowlingF (2011) ‘Are PE teacher identities fit for postmodern schools or are they clinging to modernist notions of professionalism?’ A case study of Norwegian PE teacher students’ emerging professional identities. Sport, Education and Society16(2): 201–222.
9.
EvansJ (2004) Making a difference? Education and ‘ability’ in physical education. European Physical Education Review10(1): 95–108.
10.
EvansJ (2014) Equity and inclusion in physical education PLC. European Physical Education Review20(3): 319–334.
11.
EvansJDaviesB (2017) In pursuit of equity and inclusion: Populism, politics and the future of educational research in physical education, health and sport. Sport, Education and Society22(5): 684–694.
12.
EvansJPenneyD (2008) Levels on the playing field: The social construction of physical ‘ability’ in the physical education curriculum. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy13(1): 31–47.
13.
EvansABBrownLJBrightJL (2015) Non-disabled secondary school children’s lived experiences of a wheelchair basketball programme delivered in the East of England. Sport, Education and Society20(6): 741–761.
14.
Felis-AnayaMMartos-GarciaDDevís-DevísJ (2017) Socio-critical research on teaching physical education and physical education teacher education: A systematic review. European Physical Education Review24(3): 314–329.
15.
FitzgeraldH (2005) Still feeling like a spare piece of luggage? Embodied experiences of (dis) ability in physical education and school sport. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy10(1): 41–59.
16.
FitzgeraldH (2012) ‘Drawing’ on disabled students’ experiences of physical education and stakeholder responses’. Sport, Education and Society17(4): 443–462.
17.
FlintoffAFitzgeraldHScratonS (2008) The challenges of intersectionality: Researching difference in physical education. International Studies in Sociology of Education18(2): 73–85.
18.
GrantMJBoothA (2009) A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal26(2): 91–108.
19.
GrenierMAHorrellAGenoveseB (2014) Doing things my way: Teaching Physical Education with a disability. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly31(4): 325–342.
20.
HayPJ (2005) Making judgements – student ability and assessment in physical education. Journal of Physical Education New Zealand38(1): 41–50.
21.
HayPJlisahunter (2006) ‘Please Mr Hay, what are my poss(abilities)?’: Legitimation of ability through physical education practices. Sport, Education and Society11(3): 293–310.
22.
HayPJMacdonaldD (2010a) Evidence for the social construction of ability in physical education. Sport, Education and Society15(1): 1–18.
23.
HayPJMacdonaldD (2010b) The gendering of abilities in Senior PE. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy15(3): 271–285.
24.
HenninkMHutterIBaileyA (eds) (2011) Textual data analysis. In: Qualitative Research Methods. London: SAGE, 233–268.
25.
HillsL (2007) Friendship, physicality, and physical education: An exploration of the social and embodied dynamics of girls’ physical education experiences. Sport, Education and Society12(3): 317–336.
26.
HooksB (1982) Ain’t I a Woman? Black Women and Feminism. Boston: South End Press.
27.
HunterL (2004) Bourdieu and the social space of the PE class: Reproduction of doxa through practice. Sport, Education and Society9(2): 175–192.
28.
KocaCAtencioMDemirhanG (2009) The place and meaning of the field of PE in Turkish young people’ s lives: A study using Bourdieu’s conceptual tools. Sport, Education and Society14(1): 55–75.
29.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al. (2009) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLos Med6(7): e1000097.
30.
NabaskuesIUsabiagaOMartos-GarciaD, et al. (2019) Comprensión de la habilidad desde la perspectiva del futuro profesorado de Educación Física. Retos36(2): 118–124.
31.
NybergGBackmanELarssonH (2019) Exploring the meaning of movement capability in physical education teacher education through student voices. European Physical Education Review.
32.
OvertonHWrenchAGarrettR (2017) Pedagogies for inclusion of junior primary students with disabilities in PE. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy22(4): 414–426.
33.
PenneyDJeanesRO’ConnorJ, et al. (2018) Re-theorising inclusion and reframing inclusive practice in physical education. International Journal of Inclusive Education22(10): 1062–1077.
34.
PhoenixAPattynamaP (2006) Editorial: Intersectionality. European Journal of Women’s Studies13(3): 187–192.
35.
RedeliusKHayP (2009) Defining, acquiring and transacting cultural capital through assessment in physical education. European Physical Education Review15(3): 275–294.
36.
RedeliusKFagrellBLarssonH (2009) Symbolic capital in physical education and health: To be, to do or to know? That is the gendered question. Sport, Education and Society14(2): 245–260.
37.
SaldañaJ (2009) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: SAGE.
38.
SerraP (2016) La perspectiva de género en los estudios de ciencias de la actividad física y el deporte. PhD Thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.
39.
ShillingC (2004) Physical capital and situated action: A new direction for corporeal sociology. British Journal of Sociology of Education25(4): 473–487.
40.
SmithW (2011) Skill acquisition in physical education: A speculative perspective. Quest63(3): 265–274.
41.
SparkesACMartos-GarciaDMaherAJ (2019) Me, osteogenesis imperfecta, and my classmates in physical education lessons: A case study of embodied pedagogy in action. Sport, Education and Society24(4): 338–348.
42.
StandalØF (2015) Phenomenology and Pedagogy in Physical Education. London: Routledge.
43.
StandalØFAggerholmK (2016) Habits, skills and embodied experiences: A contribution to philosophy of physical education. Sport Ethics and Philosophy10(3): 269–282.
44.
SvendbyEB (2016) (Re)Telling lived experiences in different tales: A potential pathway in working towards an inclusive PE. Sport, Education and Society21(1): 62–81.
45.
SvennbergL (2017) Swedish PE teachers’ understandings of legitimate movement in a criterion-referenced grading system. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy22(3): 257–269.
46.
TidenARedeliusKLundvallS (2015) The social construction of ability in movement assessment tools. Sport, Education and Society22(6): 697–709.
47.
TinningR (2015) Commentary on research into learning in physical education: Towards a mature field of knowledge. Sport, Education and Society20(5): 676–690.
48.
Van AmsterdamNKnoppersAClaringbouldI, et al. (2012) ‘It’s just the way it is…’ or not? How physical education teachers categorise and normalise differences. Gender and Education24(7): 783–798.
49.
Van DoodewaardCKnoppersAvan HilvoordeI (2018) ‘Of course I ask the best students to demonstrate’: Digital normalizing practices in physical education. Sport, Education and Society23(8): 786–798.
50.
Walton-FisetteJLSutherlandS (2018) Moving forward with social justice education in physical education teacher education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy23(5): 461–468.
51.
Walton-FisetteJLPhilpotRPhillipsS, et al. (2018) Implicit and explicit pedagogical practices related to sociocultural issues and social justice in physical education teacher education programs. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy23(5): 497–509.
52.
WhiteheadM (2010) Physical Literacy: Throughout the Lifecourse. New York: Routledge.
53.
WilkinsonSDPenneyD (2016) The involvement of external agencies in extra-curricular physical education: Reinforcing or challenging gender and ability inequities?Sport, Education and Society21(5): 741–758.
54.
WilkinsonSLittlefairDBarlow-MeadeL (2013) What is recognised as ability in physical education? A systematic appraisal of how ability and ability differences are socially constructed within mainstream secondary school physical education. European Physical Education Review19(2): 147–164.
55.
WiltshireGLeeJEvansJ (2017) ‘You don’t want to stand out as the bigger one’: Exploring how PE and school sport participation is influenced by pupils and their peers. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy22(5): 548–561.
56.
WrenchAGarrettR (2015) PE: It’s just me: physically active and healthy teacher bodies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education28(1): 72–91.
57.
WrightJBurrowsL (2006) Re-conceiving ability in physical education: A social analysis. Sport, Education and Society11(3): 275–291.
