The purpose of this study was to describe the experiences of adults with visual impairments regarding fitness testing during their integrated physical education experiences. An interpretative phenomenological analysis research approach was used and 11 adults (ages 20–35 years) with visual impairments acted as participants. The primary sources of data were semi-structured audiotaped telephone interviews and reflective interview notes. Thematic development was undertaken using a three-step analytical process. Based on the data analysis, the following three interrelated themes were constructed from the data: (a) ‘decent at sit-ups, but the others were embarrassing’: mixed feelings about performance; (b) ‘I couldn’t reach my full potential’: forced exclusion/inclusion; and (c) ‘I felt like a museum exhibit’: navigating unwanted social attention. These themes extend the current literature by describing salient features of fitness testing that influence the meaning that individuals with visual impairments place on those experiences.
AshbyC (2011) Whose ‘voice’ is it anyway? Giving voice and qualitative research involving individuals that type to communicate. Disability Studies Quarterly31(4): 26.
2.
AtkinsL (2016) Dis(ed)abled: Legitimating discriminatory practice in the name of inclusion?British Journal of Special Education41(1): 6–10.
3.
BogdanRBiklenSK (1998) Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Method. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
4.
BlockMEObrusnikovaI (2007) Inclusion in physical education: A review of the literature from 1995-2005. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly24(2): 103–124.
5.
BredahlA-M (2013) Sitting and watching the others being active: The experienced difficulties in physical education when having a disability. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly30(1): 40–58.
6.
CoatesJVIckermanP (2008) Let the children have their say: Children with special educational needs and their experiences of physical education – a review. Support for Learning23(4), 168–175. DOI: 10.1111/sufl.2008.23.issue-4.
7.
CoatesJVickermanP (2010) Empowering children with special educational needs to speak up: Experiences with inclusive physical education. Disability and Rehabilitation32(18): 1517–1526.
8.
CorbinCBPangraziRPWelkGJ (1995) A response to ‘the horse is dead; let’s dismount’. Pediatric Exercise Science7(4): 347–351.
9.
DavisSZhuXHaegeleJ (2018) Factors influencing high school girls’ enrolment in elective physical education: An exploratory qualitative inquiry. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education9(3): 286–299.
10.
de SchipperTLiebermanLJMoodyB (2017) ‘Kids like me, we go lightly on the head’: Experiences of children with a visual impairment on the physical self-concept. British Journal of Visual Impairment35(1): 55–68.
11.
EvansB (2006) ‘I’d feel ashamed’: Girls’ bodies and sports participation. Gender, Place, and Culture13(5): 547–561.
12.
FergusonRHKeatingXDBridgesDM, et al. (2007) California secondary school physical education teachers’ attitudes toward the mandated use of FitnessGram. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education26(2): 161–176.
13.
FitzgeraldHJoblingAKirkD (2003) Valuing the voices of young disabled people: Exploring experience of physical education and sport. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy8(2): 175–200.
14.
GarnASunH (2009) Approach-avoidance motivational profiles in early adolescents to the PACER fitness test. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education28(4): 400–421.
15.
GoodwinDLWatkinsonEJ (2000) Inclusive physical education from the perspective of students with physical disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly17(2): 144–160.
16.
HaegeleJA (2019) Inclusion illusion: Questioning the inclusiveness of integrated physical education. Quest1–11.
17.
HaegeleJAKirkTN (2018) Experiences in physical education: Exploring the intersection of visual impairment and maleness. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly35(2): 196–213.
18.
HaegeleJALiebermanLJ (2019) Movement and visual impairment: Research and practice. In: RavenscroftJ (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Visual Impairment. Oxford: Routledge, 188–202.
19.
HaegeleJASutherlandS (2015) Perspectives of students with disabilities toward physical education: A qualitative inquiry review. Quest67(3): 255–273.
20.
HaegeleJAZhuX (2017) Experiences of individuals with visual impairments in integrated physical education: A retrospective study. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport88(4): 425–435.
21.
HaegeleJAAignerCJHealyS (2019a) Prevalence of meeting physical activity, screen-time, and sleep guidelines among children and adolescents with and without visual impairments in the United States. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly36(3): 399–405.
22.
HaegeleJASatoTZhuX, et al. (2019b) Paraeducator support in integrated physical education as reflected by adults with visual impairments. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly36(1): 91–108.
23.
HaegeleJAYessickABZhuX (2018) Females with visual impairments in physical education: Exploring the intersection between disability and gender identities. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport89(3): 298–308.
24.
HarrisJCaleL (2006) A review of children’s fitness testing. European Physical Education Review12(2): 201–225.
25.
HealySMsetfiRGallagherS (2013) ‘Happy and a bit nervous’: The experiences of children with autism in physical education. British Journal of Learning Disabilities41(3): 222–228.
26.
HoppleCGrahamG (1995) What children think, feel, and know about physical fitness testing. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education14(4): 408–417.
27.
HowardKKatsosNGibsonJ (2019) Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in autism research. Autism23(7): 1871–1876.
28.
KeatingXDSilvermanS (2009) Determinants of teacher implementation of youth fitness tests in school-based physical education programs. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy14(2): 209–225.
29.
KeatingXDSubramaniamPRShanqquanR, et al. (2013) Physical education program changes from 2006-2010. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education32(2): 205–213.
30.
Lopez-GaviraRMorinaA (2015) Hidden voices in higher education: Inclusive policies and practices in social science and law classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education19(4): 365–378.
31.
MarkulaPSilkM (2011) Qualitative Research for Physical Culture. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
MercierKSilvermanS (2014) High school students’ attitudes toward fitness testing. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education33(2): 269–281.
33.
ObrusnikovaIDillonS (2012) Students’ beliefs and intentions to play with peers with disabilities in physical education: Relationships with achievement and social goals. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education31(4): 311–328.
34.
OliverKLHamzehMMcCaughtryN (2009) ‘Girly girls can play games/las ninas pueden jugar tambien’: Co-creating a curriculum of possibilities with 5th grade girls. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education28(1): 90–110.
35.
PerkinsKColumnaLLiebermanL, et al. (2013) Parents’ perceptions of physical activity for their children with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness107(2): 131–142.
36.
PlacekJHGriffinLLDoddsP, et al. (2001) Chapter 3: Middle school students’ conceptions of fitness: The long road to a healthy lifestyle. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education20(4): 314–323.
37.
SealeJK (2017) From the voice of a ‘socratic gadfly’: A call for more academic activism in the researching of disability in postsecondary education. European Journal of Special Needs Education23(1): 153–169.
38.
SmithBMcGannon (2018) Developing rigor in qualitative research: Problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology11(1): 101–121.
39.
SmithBSparkesAC (2017) Interviews. In: SmithBSparkesAC (eds), Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise. London: Routledge, pp.103–123.
40.
SmithJA (2017) Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: SmithBSparkesAC (eds), Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise. London: Routledge, 219–229.
Spencer-CavaliereNWatkinsonEJ (2010) Inclusion understood from the perspectives of children with disability. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly27(4): 275–293.
43.
WalkerSReadSPriestH (2013) Use of reflexivity in a mixed-methods study. Nurse Researcher20(3): 38–42.
44.
YardleyL (2000) Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology and Health15(2): 215– 228.
45.
ZhuXDavisSKirkTN, et al. (2018) Inappropriate practices in fitness testing and reporting: Alternative strategies. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 89(3): 46–51.
