This study examined whether single-gender or mixed-gender PE lessons were more conducive to increasing the physical activity levels of girls. One hundred and twenty girls (12–15 years) wore a wGT3x+ActiGraph accelerometer while participating in basketball games. Time spent in low (LPA), moderate (MPA), vigorous (VPA), and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were compared between a single-gender and mixed-gender PE lesson. Perceived effort and enjoyment of each lesson were also captured using a three-point scale following the intervention. Girls were found to spend significantly more time in MVPA (p = 0.01) and VPA (p = 0.006) in the single-gender environment. Furthermore, girls spent significantly less time in LPA (p = 0.014). Although girls believed that their effort did not alter with the addition of boys, they did show a preference for taking part in a single-gender environment. Results of this study suggest that segregating PE classes for game-based activities could lead girls to achieve greater health benefits through a higher level of activity.
CaseyMMEimeRMPayneWR, et al. (2009) Using a socioecological approach to examine participation in sport and physical activity among rural adolescent girls. Qualitative Health Research19(7): 881–894.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates.
4.
ColabianchiNKinsellaAECoultonCJ, et al. (2009) Utilization and physical activity levels at renovated and unrenovated school playgrounds. Preventative Medicine48(2): 140–143.
5.
CurrieCZanottiCMorganA, et al. (eds) (2012) Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2009/10 survey. Copenhagen: World Health Organization.
6.
EvensonKRCatterllierDGillK, et al. (2008) Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. Journal of Sports Science26(14): 1557–1565.
7.
HaerensLKirkDCardonG (2011) Toward the development of a pedagogical model for health-based physical education. Quest63(3): 321–338.
8.
HallalPCBo AndersenLGutholdR, et al. (2012) Global physical activity levels: Surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. The Lancet380(9838): 247–257.
9.
HillsLCrostonA (2012) ‘It should be better all together’: Exploring strategies for ‘undoing’ gender in coeducational physical education. Sport, Education and Society17(5): 591–605.
10.
HollisJSutherlandRWilliamsAJ, et al. (2017) A systematic review and meta-analysis of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels in secondary school physical education lessons. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity14(52): 1–26.
11.
JanssenILe BlancAG (2010) Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity7(40): 1–16.
12.
KerrCSmithLCharmanS, et al. (2018) Physical education contributes to total physical activity levels and predominantly in higher intensity physical activity categories. European Physical Education Review24(2): 152–164.
13.
KirkD (2005) Physical education, youth sport and lifelong participation: The importance of early learning experiences. European Physical Education Review11(3): 239–255.
14.
KnowlesAMNivenAFawknerS, et al. (2009) A longitudinal examination of the influence of maturation on physical self-perceptions and the relationship with physical activity in early adolescent girls. Journal of Adolescence32(3): 555–566.
15.
LiukkonenJBarkoukisVWattA, et al. (2010) Motivational climate and students’ emotional experiences and effort in physical education. The Journal of Educational Research103(5): 295–308.
16.
LyuMGillD (2011) Perceived physical competence, enjoyment and effort in same-sex and coeducational physical education classes. Educational Psychology31(2): 247–260.
17.
McKenzieTLLounsberyMAF (2009) School physical education: The pill not taken. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine3(3): 219–225.
18.
McKenzieTLProchaskaJSallisJ, et al. (2004) Coed and single-sex physical education in middle schools: Impact on physical activity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport74(4): 446–449.
19.
MitchellFGraySInchleyJ (2015) ‘This choice thing really works...’ Changes in experiences and engagement of adolescent girls in physical education classes, during a school-based physical activity programme. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy20(6): 593–611.
20.
MoeSGPickrelJMcKenzieTL, et al. (2006) Using school-level interviews to develop a multisite PE intervention program. Health Education and Behavior33(1): 52–65.
21.
OkelyADLubansDRMorganPJ, et al. (2017) Promoting physical activity among adolescent girls: The Girls in Sport group randomized trial. International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity14(1): 1–13.
22.
PoitresVJGrayCEBorgheseM, et al. (2016) Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism41(6): 197–239.
23.
SchwarzfischerPWeberMGruszfeldD, et al. (2017) BMI and recommended levels of physical activity in school children. BMC Public Health17(595): 1–9.
24.
Scottish Government (2016) Introducing the Scottish Index of Social Deprivation 2016. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
25.
SlingerlandMHaerensLCardonG, et al. (2013) Differences in perceived competence and physical activity levels during single-gender modified basketball game play in middle school physical education. European Physical Education Review20(1): 20–35.
26.
SlingerlandMOomenJMBorghoutsLB (2011) Physical activity levels during Dutch primary and secondary school physical education. European Journal of Sport Sciences11(4): 249–257.
27.
SmithNJLounsberyMAFMcKenzieTL (2014) Physical activity in high school physical education: Impact of lesson context and class gender composition. Journal of Physical Activity and Health11(1): 127–135.
28.
StrongWBMalinaRMBlimkieCJ, et al. (2005) Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. Journal of Paediatrics146(6): 732–737.
29.
TaylorIMNtoumanisNStandageM, et al. (2010) Motivational predictors of physical education students’ effort, exercise intentions, and leisure-time physical activity: A multilevel linear growth analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology32(1): 99–120.
30.
TimkinGMcNameeJCosteS (2019) ‘It doesn’t seem like PE and I love it!’ Adolescent girls’ views of a health club physical education approach. European Physical Education Review25(1): 109–124.
31.
TrostSGLoprinziPDMooreR, et al. (2011) Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise43(7): 1360–1368.
WesterstahlMBarnekow-BergkvistMJanssonE (2005) Low physical activity among adolescents in practical education. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports15(5): 287–297.
34.
WillenbergLJAshboltRHollandD, et al. (2010) Increasing school playground physical activity: A mixed methods study combining environmental measures and children’s perspectives. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport13(2): 210–216.
