This study investigated how university students perceive an excellent physical education (PE) teacher at the university level. A sample of 2000 university students at four universities in China responded to a 53-item questionnaire. A 6-factor, 28-item model of an excellent teacher in PE was subsequently generated with a statistical good fit, using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. The model included two traditional Chinese concepts, best defined as ‘Caring For Students’ and ‘Being Responsible.’ The other four concepts were: ‘Being A Subject Expert, Being Student-Focused, Prompting Students’ All-Around Growth’ and ‘Being A Lifelong Learner.’ Multivariate analysis of variance showed that students’ grade level and major contributed to statistically-significant differences in their conceptualisation of excellent PE teaching. Study findings were compared with those in other relevant literature.
AndersonJCGerbingDW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin103(3): 411–423.
2.
ArmourKM (2010) The physical education profession and its professional responsibility, or why ‘12 weeks paid holiday’ will never be enough. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy15: 1–13.
3.
ArmourKMMakopoulouKChambersF (2012) Progression in physical education teachers’ career-long professional learning: Conceptual and practical concerns. European Physical Education Review18: 62–77.
4.
ArrighiMAYoungJC (1987) Teachers’ perceptions about effective and successful teaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education6: 122–135.
5.
AtencioMJessMDewarK (2012) It is a case of changing your thought processes, the way you actually teach: Implementing a complex professional learning agenda in Scottish physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy17(2): 127–144.
6.
Australian Government Preventative Health Taskforce (2010) The healthiest country by 2020. Discussion paper. Report, Canberra, Australia: Australian Government.
7.
BaleyJAFieldDA (1976) Physical Education and the Physical Educator. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
8.
BetoretFDArtigaAG (2004) Trainee teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning, classroom layout and exam design. Educational Studies30(4): 355–372.
9.
BeveridgeSKGangsteadSKMcElroyL (1986) A cross sectional comparison of the perceptions of the role of the physical educator. The Physical Educator43(2): 75–81.
10.
BrockSJRovegnoIOliverKL (2009) The influence of student status on student interactions and experiences during a sport education unit. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy14(4): 355–375.
11.
BrownGTL (2004) Measuring attitude with positively packed self-report ratings: Comparison of agreement and frequency scales. Psychological Reports94: 1015–1024.
12.
BrowneMWCudeckR (1989) Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research24: 445–455.
13.
ByraM (2006) Teaching style and inclusive pedagogies. In: KirkDMacdonaldDO’SullivanM (eds) The Handbook of Physical Education. London: Sage, pp. 449–466.
14.
ByrneBM (2010) Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Routledge.
15.
ChenY (2010) Analysis and strategies of college physical education reform. Asian Social Science6(11): 209–212.
16.
ChowBLouieL (1992) A comparison of role perceptions of a successful physical education among physical educator majors and established physical education in Hong Kong. Chinese University of Hong Kong Education Journal20(2): 65–73.
17.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
CortazziMJinL (1996) English teaching and learning in China. Language Teaching29(2): 61–80.
19.
CostelloABOsborneJW (2005) Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analyses. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation10(7): 1–9.
20.
DingG (2001) Nationalization and internationalization: Two turning points in China’s Education in the twentieth century. In: PetersonGHayhoeRLuY (eds) Education, Culture, and Identity in Twentieth-Century China. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, pp.161–186.
21.
DuJ (2010) Analyzing current physical education curriculum situations at high schools in Taiyuan. Taiyuan Technology University Journal10: 25–30.
22.
FengJ (1994) Asian-American Children: What Teachers Should Know?Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education.
23.
GaoLWatkinsDA (2002) Conceptions of teaching held by school science teachers in P R China: Identification and cross-cultural comparisons. Science Education24(1): 61–79.
24.
HaggerMSChatzisarantisNLD (2007) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Exercises and Sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
25.
HarrisA (1999) Teaching and Learning in the Effective School. Brookfield, Vermont: Ashgate.
26.
HickeyCJinA (2007) Contemporary PE reform in China: Teachers’ talk. In: 37th Australian Association for Research in Education conference, Fremantle, Australia, 2 December 2007.
27.
HicksonCFishburneG (2002) Effective teaching in elementary schools: Subject area differences. In: Annual Convention of the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, San Diego, CA, 28 April 2002.
28.
HicksonCFishburneG (2004) What is effective physical education teaching and can it be promoted with generalist trained elementary school teachers? In: 34th Australian Association for Research in Education conference. Melbourne, Australia, 4 December 2004.
29.
HicksonCFishburneG (2005) Teacher development: Enhancing effective teaching in elementary school physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport76(1): 32–40.
30.
HoyleRH (1995) The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In: HoyleR H (ed) Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.1–15.
31.
HoyleRHDuvallJL (2004) Determining the number of factors in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In: KaplanD (ed) The SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.301–315.
32.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling6: 1–55.
33.
HughesIYuanL (2005) The status of action research in the People‘s Republic of China. Action Research3(4): 383–402.
34.
JenkinsJMAldermanBL (2011) Influence of support education on group cohesion in university physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education30(3): 214–230.
KottlerJAZehmSJ (2000) On Being a Teacher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
37.
KottlerJAZehmSJKottlerE (2005) On Being a Teacher: The Human Dimension. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
38.
KougioumtzisKPatrikssonGStrahlmanO (2011) Physical education teachers’ professionalization: A review of occupational power and professional control. European Physical Education Review17(1): 111–129.
39.
LamTCMKlockarsAJ (1982) The influence of labels and positions in rating scales. Journal of Educational Measurement19: 312–322.
40.
LiZXLiCF (2010) The construction of effective teaching in middle school physical education class. Jinlin Normal University Journal4: 40–45.
41.
LiuZ (1973) The Way of Being a Teacher in China - The Way of Teachers. Taipei: Chung Hwa Book Co.
42.
LynnMR (1986) Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research35: 382–385.
43.
MacPhailA (2011) Professional learning as a physical education teacher educator. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy16(4): 435–451.
44.
MacPhailAKirkDKinchinG (2004) Sport education: Promoting team affiliation through physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education23: 106–122.
45.
MawerM (1995) The Effective Teaching of Physical Education. London: Longman.
46.
MeurerSJRubioDMCounteMA. (2002) Development of a healthcare quality improvement measurement tool: Results of a content validity study. Hospital Topics80: 7–13.
47.
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (2000). Outline for Reform and Development of Education in China. Beijing: the People’s Republic of China.
48.
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (2010) National Outline for Mid and Long-Term Education Reform and Development 2010–2020. Beijing: the People’s Republic of China.
49.
National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) (2004) Moving into the Future: National Content Standards for Physical Education. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
50.
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) (2009) What teachers should know and be able to do: National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Available at: http://www.nbpts.org/resources/publications(accessed 2 December 2011).
51.
OsborneJSimonSCollinsS (2003) Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education25(9): 1049–1080.
52.
ParkerJ (1995) Secondary teachers’ views of effective teaching in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education4(2): 127–139.
53.
PlacekJHDoddsP (1988) A critical incident study of preservice teachers’ beliefs about teaching success and nonsuccess. Research Quarterly59(4): 351–358.
54.
RoweKJ (2004) Submission to inquiry into the sex discrimination amendment (teaching profession) bill 2004 by the Australian senate legal and constitutional legislation committee. In: 34th Australian Council for Educational Research, Adelaide, Australia, 24 October 2004.
55.
SchemppPG (1985) Becoming a better teacher: An analysis of the student teaching experience. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education4: 158–166.
56.
SilvermanS (1991) Research on teaching in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport62(4): 352–364.
57.
SmithDC (1992) The Chinese family in transition: Implications for education and society in modern Taiwan. In: Comparative educationassociation and World Bank seminar, Annapolis, Maryland, 12 March 1992.
58.
SmithPPetraliaJHewittK (2005) Tuned in: Listening to student voices. Principal Leadership6(3): 28–33.
59.
StewartJLLynnMRMishelMH (2005) Evaluating content validity for children’s self-report instruments using children as content experts. Nursing Research54: 414–418.
60.
StraubDBoudreauMCGefenD (2004) Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems13: 380–427.
61.
ThorburnMJessMAtencioM (2011) Thinking differently about curriculum: Analyzing the potential contribution of physical education as part of ‘health and wellbeing’ during a time of revised curriculum ambitions in Scotland. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy16(4): 383–398.
62.
TsangaridouN (2006) Teachers’ knowledge. In: KirkDMacdonaldDO’SullivanM (eds) The Handbook of Physical Education. London: Sage, pp. 502–515.
63.
WallianNChangCE (2006) Development and learning of motor skill competencies. In: KirkDMacdonaldD and OSullivanM (eds) The Handbook of Physical Education. London: Sage, pp. 292–311.
64.
WangLHWangJJLiuZH (2008) A research of students participating in the evaluation of sports teaching in general colleges. Journal of Beijing Sport University4: 527–528.
65.
WangXZLiuJHuangCQ. (2008) School physical education reform and development in the people’s republic of China. In: Haddad CTanLL (eds) Innovative Practices in Physical Education and Sports in Asia. Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCO Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education, pp.59–71.
66.
WatkinsDAZhangQ (2006) The good teacher: A cross-cultural perspective. In: McInerneyDDowsonMVan EttenS (eds) Effective Schools. Greenwich, CT: Connecticut Information Age Publishing, pp.185–204.
67.
ZhangJCollisB (1995) Comparison of teaching models in the West and in China. E-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology1(1): 3–11.
68.
ZhangTSolmonMAKosmaM. (2011) Need support, need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and physical activity participation among middle school students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education30(1): 51–68.
69.
ZhouN (2006) An International Perspective on Teacher Education: Teacher Education Reform, Teacher Professional Standard and School-based Teacher Development. Shanghai, China: East China Normal University Press.
