The primary purpose of this study was to develop and validate a System for Observing the Teaching of Games in Physical Education (SOTG-PE). Primary pilot testing of the SOTG-PE was conducted in a large, selective, all-boys secondary school in the north-west of England. Two hundred and eighty three pupils aged 11–16 volunteered as participants for the pilot testing phase of this study. The SOTG-PE coded 1379 minutes of physical education games lessons across three games categories, including invasion, net/wall and striking and fielding. In addition, the teaching interactions of four full-time teachers of physical education and one pre-service teacher were also coded. The inter-observer and intra-observer mean re-test coefficients suggest that the SOTG-PE is valid for evaluating and recording child activity, lesson context and teacher interactions during various physical education games lessons in the UK.
AlexanderKPenneyD (2005) Teaching under the influence: feeding Games for Understanding into the Sport Education development refinement cycle. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy10: 287–301.
2.
AllisonSThorpeR (1997) A comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching games within physical education. A skill approach versus a game for understanding approach. British Journal of Physical EducationAutumn28(3), 9–13.
3.
AlmondL. (1986). Primary and secondary rules. In ThorpeR.BunkerD.AlmondL. (Eds.), Rethinking games teaching (pp. 38–40). Loughborough: University of Technology, Loughborough.
4.
ArnettMGLutzRB (2003) Measurement of moderate to vigorous physical activity of middle school girls, using TriTrac activity monitors during small-sided, game-based lessons. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science7: 149–159.
5.
BakemanRGottmanMJ (1997) Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.
6.
BrewerJCJonesLR (2002) A five-stage process for establishing contextually valid systematic observation instruments: the case of Rugby Union. The Sport Psychologist16: 138–159.
7.
BrookerRKirkDBraiukaSBransgroveA (2000) Implementing a game sense approach to teaching junior high school basketball in a naturalistic setting. European Physical Education Review6(1): 7–26.
8.
BunkerDThorpeR (1982) A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education18: 5–8.
9.
ButlerIJ (2005) TGfU pet-agogy: old dogs, new tricks and puppy school. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy10: 225–240.
10.
ButlerIJMcCahanJB (2005) Teaching games for understanding as a curriculum model. In: GriffinLButlerJ (eds) Teaching Games for Understanding, Theory, Research and Practice. Campaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
11.
Den DuynN (1997) Game Sense: Developing Thinking Players. Canberra: Australian Sports Commission.
12.
EvansJClarkeC (1988) Changing the face of physical education. In: EvansJ (ed.) Teachers, Teaching and Control. London: Falmer.
13.
FaircloughSStrattonGBaldwinG (2002) The contribution of secondary school physical education to lifetime physical activity. European Physical Education Review8: 69–84.
14.
FrenchKEThomasJR (1987) The relation of knowledge development to children’s basketball performance. Journal of Sport Psychology9: 15–32.
15.
GréhaigneJFGodboutP (1995) Tactical knowledge in team sports from a constructivist and cognitivist perspective. Quest47: 490–505.
16.
GréhaigneJFGodboutPBouthierD (1997) Performance assessment in team sports. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education16: 500–516.
17.
GréhaigneJFRichardJFGriffinLL (2005a) Teaching and Learning Team Sports and Games. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
18.
GréhaigneJFWallianNGodboutP (2005b) Tactical-decision learning model and student practices. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy10: 255–269.
19.
GriffinLMitchellSOslinJL (1997) Teaching Sport Concepts and Skills. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
20.
GriffinLOslinJLMitchellSA (1995) An analysis of two instructional approaches to teaching net games. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport66: A–64.
21.
GriffinLLBrookerRPattonK (2005) Working towards legitimacy: two decades of Teaching Games for Understanding. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy10: 213–223.
22.
GurvitchRBlankenshipBTMetzlerMWLundJL (2008) Chapter 3: student teachers’ implementation of model based instruction: facilitators and inhibitors. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education27: 466–496.
23.
HastiePASinelnikovOAGuarinoAJ (2009) The development of skill and tactical competencies during a season of badminton. European Journal of Sport Science9: 133–140.
24.
HoltEJWardPWallheadTL (2006) The transfer of learning from play practices to game play in young adult soccer players. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy11: 101–118.
25.
HoltNLStreanWBBengoecheaEG (2002) Expanding the teaching games for understanding model: new avenues for future research and practice. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education21: 162–176.
26.
HopperT (2002) Teaching Games for Understanding. The importance of student emphasis over content emphasis. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance73: 44–48.
27.
HopperT (2007) Teaching tennis with assessment ‘for’ and ‘as’ learning: a TGfU net/wall example. Journal of Physical Health Education73, 3: 1–11.
28.
KazdinAE (1982) Single Case Research Designs. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
KirkDMacPhailA (2002) Teaching games for understanding and situated learning: rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education21: 177–192.
30.
LaunderA (2001) Play Practice: the Games Approach to Teaching and Coaching Sports. Adelaide, SA: Human Kinetics.
31.
LawsC (1994) Rhetorical justification for new approaches to teaching games: are teachers deluding themselves? In: Proceedings of the 10th Commonwealth and Scientific Congress, University of Victoria, Canada.
32.
LeeMAWardP (2009) Generalization of tactics in tag rugby from practice to games in middle school physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy14: 189–207.
33.
LightR. (2004) Australian coaches’ experiences of Game Sense: Opportunities and challenges, Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 9(2), 115–132.
McKenzieTL (2002) Use of direct observation to assess physical activity. In: WelkG (ed.) Physical Activity Assessments for Health Related Research. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
36.
McKenzieTLSallisJFNadarPR (1991) SOFIT: System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education11: 195–205.
37.
MemmertDHarveyS (2008) The Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI): some concerns and solutions for further development. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education27: 220–240.
38.
MetzlerMW (2005) Instructional Models for Physical Education. Holcomb Hathaway Publishers, Inc.
39.
MitchellSAGriffinLLOslinJL (1995) The effects of two instructional approaches on game performance. Pedagogy in Practice: Teaching and Coaching in Physical Education and Sports1: 36–48.
40.
MitchellSAOslinJL (1999) An investigation of tactical transfer in net games. European Journal for Cognitive Psychology4: 162–172.
41.
MorganKSprouleJWeigandDCarpenterP (2005) A computer-based observational assessment of the teaching behaviours that influence motivational climate in physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy10: 183–105.
42.
MorrowJR (2002) Measurement issues for the assessment of physical activity. In: WelkG (ed.) Physical Activity Assessments for Health Related Research. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
43.
OslinJLMitchellSA (2006) Game-centred approaches to teaching physical education. In: KirkDMacdonaldDO’SullivanM (eds) The Handbook of Physical Education. London: Sage Publications.
44.
OslinJLMitchellSAGriffinLL (1998) The games performance assessment instrument: development and preliminary validation. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education17: 231–243.
45.
PopeRPColemanKJGonzalezECBarronFHeathEM (2002) Validity of a revised System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT). Paediatric Exercise Science14: 135–146.
46.
RidgersNDStrattonGMcKenzieTL (2010) Reliability and validity of the System for Observing Children’s Activity and Relationships during Play (SOCARP). Journal of Physical Activity and Health7: 17–25.
47.
RinkJE (1996) Tactical and skill approaches to teaching sport and games [monograph]. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education15: 3.
48.
RobertsSJ (2007) Performance in invasion games: an assessment of ITT/PGCE physical education teachers. Physical Education Matters2: 42–48.
49.
RossiTFryJMMcNeillMTanCWK (2007) The Games Concept Approach (GCA) as a mandated practice: views of Singaporean teachers. Sport, Education and Society12: 93–111.
50.
RovegnoI (1992) Learning to teach in a field-based methods course: the development of pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education8: 69–82.
51.
RovegnoI (1993) Content knowledge acquisition during undergraduate teacher education: overcoming cultural templates and learning through practice. American Educational Research Journal30: 611–42.
52.
SageG (2003) Forward. In: The Future of Physical Education: Building a New Pedagogy. London: Routledge.
53.
School Sport Survey (2007/2008). Report Number DCSF-RW063. London: TNS.
54.
SharpeTKoperwasJ (1997) Software assist for education and social science settings. In: Behaviour Evaluation Strategies and Taxonomies and Accompanying Qualitative Applications HandbookThousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
55.
SiedentopD (1994) Sport Education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
56.
SiedentopDHastiePAvan der MarsH (2007) The Complete Guide to Sport Education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
57.
SprouleJKinchinGYellingMMcMorrisTMcNeillM (2002) Using computer technology to compare student teaching behaviours. European Journal of Physical Education7: 123–135.
58.
TurnerAP (2005) Teaching and learning games at the secondary level. In: GriffinLLButlerJL (eds) Teaching Games for Understanding: Theory, Research and Practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
59.
TurnerAPMartinekTJ (1999) An investigation into teaching games for understanding: effects on skill, knowledge and game play. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport70: 286–296.
60.
WilsonGE (2002) A framework for teaching tactical game knowledge. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance73: 20–26, 56.
61.
WrightSMcNeilMFryJTanSTanCSchemppP (2006) Implications of student teachers’ implementation of a curricular innovation. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education25,(3), 310–328.
62.
WrightSMcNeillMFryJWangJ (2005) Teaching teachers to play and teach games. Physical Education and Sports Pedagogy10: 61–82.
