Motivational profiles for secondary school physical education and its relationship to the adoption of a physically active lifestyle among university students
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2010
Motivational profiles for secondary school physical education and its relationship to the adoption of a physically active lifestyle among university students
The promotion of an active lifestyle is one of the central aims of physical education (PE). The present study aimed at investigating the relation between students’ motivation for PE and activity levels using self-determination theory as a guiding framework. A retrospective design was used involving 2617 university students, of which 878 (33.5 percent) were male (age 20.6 1.9). Validated questionnaires were used to measure motivation for PE, self-reported concurrent (activity levels at secondary school) and delayed transfer (activity levels at university). A combination of hierarchical and non-hierarchical cluster analyses was used to generate motivational profiles for PE. Differences in activity levels were analysed using MANCOVAS. The results revealed that students with more optimal (i.e. more autonomous) motivational profiles reported more transfer and reported being more active at secondary school and in early adulthood. Implementing strategies that enhance self-determined motivation might result in more students’ adopting an active lifestyle.
Asendorpf JB, Borkenau P., Ostendorf F., and van Aken MAG ( 2001) Carving personality at its joints: confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. European Journal of Personality15: 169-98.
2.
Bailey R., Armour K., Kirk D., Jess M., Pickup I., Sandford R., and the BERA Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy Special Interest Group (2009) The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: an academic review . Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy24: 1-27.
3.
Bandura A. ( 1989) Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist44: 1175-84.
4.
Boiché JCS, Sarrazin PG, Pelletier LG, Grouzet FME and Chanal JP ( 2008) Student’s motivational profiles and achievement outcomes in physical education: a self-determination perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology100(3): 688-701.
5.
Cerin E., Leslie E., and Owen N. ( 2009) Explaining socio-economic status differences in walking for transport: an ecological analysis of individual, social and environmental factors. Social Science and Medicine68(6): 1013-20.
6.
Chanan G., Gilchrist L. ( 1974) What School is for. London: Methuen.
7.
Corbin CB ( 2002) Physical education as an agent of change. Quest54: 182-95.
8.
Cox A., Williams L. ( 2008b) The roles of perceived teacher support, motivational climate, and psychological need satisfaction in students’ physical education motivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology30(2): 222-39.
9.
Cox A., Smith AL, and Williams L. ( 2008a) Change in physical education motivation and physical activity behavior during middle school. Journal of Adolescent Health43: 506-13.
10.
De Bilde J., Vansteenkiste M., and Lens W. (in press) Understanding the association between future time perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of self-determination theory . Learning and Instruction.
11.
Deci EL, Ryan RM ( 1991) A motivational approach to self: integration in personality . In: Dienstbier R (ed.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Perspectives on Motivation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press .
12.
Deci EL, Ryan RM ( 2000) The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry11: 227-68.
13.
Deci EL, Eghrari H., Patrick BC, and Leone D. ( 1994) Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality62: 119-42.
14.
Deci EL, Koestner R., and Ryan RM ( 1999) A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin125: 627-68.
15.
Department of Culture, Media and Sport (2009 ) Taking Part: England’s Survey of Culture, Leisure and Sport: Headline Findings from the Child Survey 2007. URL (consulted Jan. 2009): http://www.culture.gov.uk/reference_library/publications/5481.aspx
16.
Eccles JS, Wigfield A. ( 2002) Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology53: 109-32.
17.
Fairclough SJ ( 2003) Girls’ physical activity during high school physical education: influences of body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness . Journal of Teaching in Physical Education22: 382-95.
18.
Fairclough S., Stratton G., and Baldwin G. ( 2002) The contribution of secondary school physical education to lifetime physical activity. European Physical Education Review8(1): 69-84.
19.
Ferrer-Caja E., Weiss MR ( 2000) Predictors of intrinsic motivation among adolescent students in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport71(3): 267-79.
20.
Gore PA ( 2000) Cluster analysis. In: Tinsley HEA, Brown SD (eds) Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling, pp. 297-321. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21.
Green K., Smith A., and Roberts K. ( 2005a) Young people and lifelong participation in physical education: a sociological perspective on contemporary physical education programmes in England and Wales. Leisure Studies24: 27-43.
22.
Green K., Smith A., and Roberts K. ( 2005b) Social class, young people, sport and physical education . In: Green K, Hardman K (eds) Physical Education: Essential Issues. London: Sage .
23.
Grolnick WS, Kurowski CO, and Gurland ST ( 1999) Family processes and the development of children’s self-regulation. Educational Psychologist34: 3-14.
24.
Haerens L., De Bourdeaudhuij I., Maes L., Cardon G., and Deforche B. ( 2007) School Based Randomized Controlled Trial of a Physical Activity Intervention among Adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health40(3): 258-65.
25.
Hagger MS, Culverhouse T., Chatzisarantis NLD, and Biddle SJH ( 2003) The processes by which perceived autonomy support in physical education promotes leisure-time physical activity intentions and behavior: a trans-contextual model. Journal of Educational Psychology95(4): 784-95.
26.
Harter S. ( 1981) A new self-report scale of intrinsic vs. extrinsic orientation in the classroom: motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology17: 300-12.
27.
Kirk D. ( 2010) Physical Education Futures. London : Routledge.
28.
Kirk D., Brooker R., and Braiuka S. ( 2000) Teaching Games for Understanding: a situated perspective on student learning. Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. New Orleans , April.
29.
Koka A., Hein V. ( 2005) The effect of perceived teacher feedback on intrinsic motivation in physical education. International Journal of Sport36(2): 91-106.
30.
Lave J. ( 1997) The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding . In: Kirshner D, Whitson JA (eds) Situated Cognition: Social, Semiotic and Psychological Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31.
Lefevre J., Matton L., Philippaerts R., De Bourdeaudhuij I., Balduck A., Wijndaele K., and Macdonald D. ( 1990) The relationship between the sex composition of physical education classes and teacher/pupil verbal interaction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education9: 152-63.
32.
Markland D., Tobin VA ( 2004) Modification of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology26: 191-6.
33.
Mouratidis A., Lens W., and Vansteenkiste M. (in press) How you provide corrective feedback makes a difference: the motivating role of communicating in an autonomy way . Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology..
34.
Ntoumanis N. ( 2001) A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology71: 225-42.
35.
Ntoumanis N. ( 2005) A prospective study of participation in optional school physical education using a self-determination theory framework. Journal of Educational Psychology97: 444-53.
36.
Nuyts E., Zwerts E. ( 2001) Onderzoek Verplaatsingsgedrag Stadsgewest Gent (januari 2000-januari 2001). Deel 3A: analyse personenvragenlijst . URL (consulted June 2009): http://www.mobielvlaanderen.be/pdf/ovg-gent/ovggent1-deel3a.pdf
37.
Pate RR, Freedson PS, Sallis JF, Taylor WC, Sirard J., Trost SG, and Dowda M. ( 2002) Compliance with physical activity guidelines: prevalence in a population of children and youth. Annals of Epidemiology12(5): 303-8.
38.
Peddiwell JA ( 1937) The Saber-Tooth Curriculum. New York : McGraw-Hill.
39.
Philippaerts RM, Matton L., Wijndaele K., Balduck A., De Bourdeaudhuij I., and Lefevre J. ( 2006) Validity of a physical activity computer questionnaire in 12- to 18 year old boys and girls. International Journal of Sports Medicine27: 131-6.
40.
Reeve J., Jang H. ( 2006) What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology98: 209-18.
41.
Roberts K. ( 2001) Class in Modern Britain. Basingstoke : Palgrave.
42.
Ryan RM, Connell JP ( 1989) Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57: 749-61.
43.
Ryan RM, Deci EL ( 2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist55: 68-78.
44.
Ryan RM, Lynch, MF, Vansteenkiste M., and Deci EL (in press) Motivation and autonomy in counseling, psychotherapy, and behavior change: a look at theory and practice. Counseling Psychologist ..
45.
Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ and Taylor WC ( 2000) A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise32(5): 963-75.
46.
Siedentop D (ed.) (1994) Sport Education: Quality PE through Positive Sport Experiences. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
47.
Siedentop D. ( 1996) Valuing the physically active life: contemporary and future directions. Quest48: 266-74.
48.
Sierens E., Vansteenkiste M., Goossens L., Soenens B., and Dochy F. ( 2009) The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology79: 57-68.
49.
Simons J., Dewitte S., and Lens W. ( 2003) Don’t do it for me, do it for yourself! Stressing the personal relevance enhances motivation in physical education. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology25: 145-60.
50.
Standage M., Duda JL, and Ntoumanis N. ( 2003) A model of contextual motivation in physical education: using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. Journal of Educational Psychology95(1): 97-110.
51.
Tammelin T., Näyhä S., Laitinen J., Rintamäki H., and Järvelin MR (2003) Physical activity and social status in adolescence as predictors of physical inactivity in adulthood . Preventive Medicine37: 375-81.
52.
Vansteenkiste M., Lens W., De Witte S., De Witte H., and Deci EL ( 2004b) The why and why not of job search behaviour: their relation to searching, unemployment experience and well being. European Journal of Social Psychology3: 345-63.
53.
Vansteenkiste M., Lens W., and Deci EL ( 2006) Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal-contents in self-determination theory: another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist41: 19-31.
54.
Vansteenkiste M., Niemiec C., and Soenens B. ( 2010) The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: an historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions. In: Urdan T, Karabenick S (eds) Advances in Motivation and Achievement , vol. 16: The Decade Ahead. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
55.
Vansteenkiste M., Ryan RM, and Deci EL ( 2008) Self-determination theory and the explanatory role of psychological needs in human well-being. In: Bruni L, Comim F, and Pugno M (eds) Capabilities and Happiness . Oxford: Oxford University Press , 187-223.
56.
Vansteenkiste M., Sierens E., Soenens B., Luyckx K., and Lens W. ( 2009) Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: the quality of motivation matters. Journal of Educational Psychology101: 671-88.
57.
Vansteenkiste M., Simons J., Soenens B., and Lens W. ( 2004a) How to become a persevering exerciser? The importance of providing a clear, future intrinsic goal in an autonomy-supportive manner . Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology26: 232-49.
58.
Ward J., Wilkinson C., Graser V. and Prusak A. ( 2008) Effects of choice on student motivation and physical activity behavior in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education27: 385-98.
59.
Wareham NJ, Rennie KL ( 1998) The assessment of physical activity in individuals and populations: why try to be more precise about how physical activity is assessed ? International Journal of Obesity22: S30-8.
60.
Wright J. ( 1997) The construction of gendered contexts in single sex and coeducational physical education lessons. Sport, Education and Society2: 55-72.
