Influence of a physical education teacher’s disability on middle school pupils’ learning and perceptions of teacher competence

Abstract

Limited research has investigated the problems encountered by physical education teachers who have disabilities and instruct able-bodied pupils. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of a physical education teacher’s disability on middle school pupils’ perceptions of the teacher’s competence and their learning. Participants were 201 7th and 8th grade pupils (age range 12 to 16 years). They were randomly assigned to watch one of two videotaped swimming lessons. These lessons were identical except that in the first lesson the teacher taught from a wheelchair (WCL) while in the second she was able-bodied (ABL). Immediately following the watching of their assigned lesson, pupils completed a questionnaire asking them about their perceptions of the teacher’s competence and an examination over lesson content. Inferential statistical tests revealed that there were no significant differences in the perception and examination scores of those pupils who viewed the WCL and the ABL. These results provide further support for a sociological explanation of how and why pupils of different ages respond to and learn from physical education teachers with a disability.

Keywords

disability influence of disability physical education pupils’ learning and perceptions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bandura, A. ( 1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. ( 2002) ‘Social Cognitive Theory in Cultural Context’ , Applied Psychology: An International Review 51(2): 269-90.

Bryant, L. and Curtner-Smith, M.D. ( 2008) ‘Impact of a Physical Education Teacher’s Disability on Elementary Pupils’ Perceptions of Effectiveness and Learning’ , Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 25(2): 118-31.

Chaikin, S. , Gillen, O. , and Derlega, V.J. ( 1978) ‘Students’ Reactions to Teachers’ Physical Attractiveness and Nonverbal Behavior: Two Exploratory Studies’, Psychology in the Schools 15: 588-95.

Coakley, J. ( 2007) Sports in Society (9th edn). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Curtner-Smith. M.D. ( 2002) ‘Methodological Issues in Research’, in A. Laker (ed.) The Sociology of Sport and Physical Education, pp. 36-57. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Curtner-Smith, M.D. , Hasty, D.L. , and Kerr, I.G. ( 2001) ‘Teachers’ Use of Productive and Reproductive Teaching Styles Prior to and Following the Introduction of National Curriculum Physical Education’, Educational Research 43(3): 333-40.

Dean, M.B. , Adams, T.M. , and Comeau, M.J. ( 2005) ‘The Effect of a Female Physical Educator’s Physical Appearance on Physical Fitness Knowledge and Attitudes of Junior High Students’, Physical Educator 62(1): 14-25.

Feshbach, F. , and Feshbach, S. ( 1972) ‘Imitation of Teacher Preferences in a Field Setting’ , Developmental Psychology 7: 84.

10.

Flanagan, J. C. (1954) ‘The Critical Incident Technique’, Psychological Bulletin 4: 327-58. Flesch, R. F. (1951) How to Test Readability. New York: Harper.

11.

Gergen, M. and Gergen, K. (2003) Social Constructionism: A Reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Henkel, R. E. (1976) Tests of Significance. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

12.

Johnson, M.W. ( 1985) ‘Physical Education - Fitness or Fraud?’, Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance 56(1): 33-5.

13.

Kincaid, J.P. , Fishburne, R.P., Jr. , Rogers, R.L. , and Chissom, B.S. (1975) Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel, Research Brand Report 8-75, Millington, TN: Navy Technical Training, US Naval Air Station, Memphis, TN.

14.

Landers, D. , and Landers, D. ( 1973) ‘Teachers vs. Peer Model’s Presence and Performance Level on Motor Behavior’, Journal of Motor Behavior 5: 129-39.

15.

Martinek, T.J. ( 1981) ‘Pygmalion in the Gym: A Model for the Communication of Teacher Expectations in Physical Education’, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 52(1): 58-67.

16.

Martinek, T.J. , Crowe, P.B. and Rejeski, W.J. ( 1982) Pygmalion in the Gym: Causes and Effects of Expectations in Teaching and Coaching. New York: Leisure Press.

17.

Melville, D.S. and Maddalozzo, J. ( 1988) ‘The Effects of a Physical Educator’s Appearance of Body Fatness on Communicating Exercise Concepts to High School Students’ , Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 7: 343-52.

18.

Michalko, R. ( 2002) The Difference that Disability Makes. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

19.

Molloy, J.T. ( 1975) Dress for Success. New York: Wyden.

20.

Mosston, M. ( 1981) Teaching Physical Education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

21.

Oliver, M. ( 1990) The Politics of Disablement: A Sociological Approach. New York: St Martin’s Press.

22.

Phillips, D.A. , Carlisle, C. , Steffen, J. and Stroot, S. ( 1986) ‘The Computerized Version of the Physical Education Teacher Assessment Instrument’, unpublished manuscript, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO.

23.

Shilling, C. ( 2003) The Body and Social Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

24.

Smith, B. and Sparkes, A.C. ( 2005) ‘Men, Sport, Spinal Cord Injury , and Narratives of Hope’, Social Science and Medicine 61: 1095-1105.

25.

Spencer, A. ( 1998) ‘Physical Educator: Role Model or Role the Ball Out?’, Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance 69(6): 58-63.

26.

Thomson, C.W. ( 1996) ‘Apparent Teacher Fitness Level and its Effect on Student Test Scores’, Indiana Association for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance 25: 17-20.

27.

Thomson, R.G. ( 1997) Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.

28.

Trouilloud, D.O. , Sarrazin, P.G. , Martinek, T.J. and Guillet, E. ( 2002) ‘The Influence of Teacher Expectations on Student Achievement in Physical Education Classes: Pygmalion Revisited’, European Journal of Social Psychology 32: 591-607.

29.

Wilmore, J.H. ( 1982) ‘Objectives for the Nation - Physical Fitness and Exercise’, Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance 53(3): 41-3.