The relationship between curriculum time for physical education and literacy and numeracy standards in South Australian primary schools

Abstract

There is ongoing debate among educators and in the community about the status of school physical education (PE), particularly in relation to more vocationally-oriented learning areas. Against a backdrop of rising youth obesity, diminishing curriculum time for PE represents a serious public health issue. This study investigated the relation ships between PE curriculum time and literacy and numeracy standards in South Australian primary schools. Schools (n= 117) were surveyed on average time spent on PE (PE_time), and salient demographic characteristics. Average literacy and numeracy scores from a standardized statewide assessment system (State LaN), were obtained from government records. Regression modelling assessed the relationship between PE_time and State LaN scores, independent of socioeconomic status (SES), percentage of children of non-English-speaking background (NESB), geographic location, staff age structure, and staff PE training. PE_time was unrelated to literacy and numeracy attainment, after control for demographic variables. There was a strong positive relation ship between SES and academic attainment, while a higher proportion of younger staff predicted lower academic attainment. There was no evidence that schools with relatively high PE_time are disadvantaging students in the traditionally academic subjects.

Keywords

academic attainment curriculum physical activity physical education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bilbrough, A. and Jones, P. (1973) Developing Patterns in Physical Education. London: University of London Press .

Booth, M. , Chey, T. , Wake, M. , Norton, K. , Hesketh, K. , Dollman, J. and Robertson, I. (2002) ‘Change in the Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity among Young Australians, 1969-1997’ , American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 77(1): 29-36 .

Bourdieu, P. (1999) ‘The Order of Things’, in P. Bourdieu et al. (eds) The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society, pp. 60-76. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .

Brown, R. , Lewis, F. , Murtagh, M. , Thorpe, S. and Collins, R. (1999) 100 Minutes Project: Researching PE and Sport in DETE Schools. Adelaide: Flinders University of South Australia .

Caddick, A. (1986) ‘Feminism and the Body’ , Arena 74: 60-68 .

Cale, L. and Harris, J. (2005) ‘Promoting Physical Activity within Schools’, in L. Cale and J. Harris (eds) Exercise and Young People, pp. 191-208. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan .

Cale, L. , Harris, J. and Leggett, G. (2002) ‘Making a Difference? Lessons Learned from a Health-Related Exercise Resource’ , Bulletin of Physical Education 38(3): 145-160 .

Connell, R. (1993) Schools and Social Justice: Our Schools/Ourselves. Toronto: Foundation & Pluto Press .

Dodd, G. (2003) ‘Toward a Broader Appreciation of Human Motion in Education’, unpublished PhD thesis, Deakin University.

10.

Ebbeling, C. , Pawlak, D. and Ludwig, D. (2002) ‘Childhood Obesity, Public-Health Crisis, Common Sense Cure’ , The Lancet 360: 473-482 .

11.

Education Board of Great Britain (1933) Syllabus of Physical Training for Schools. London: HMSO .

12.

Fox, K. and Harris, J. (2003) ‘Promoting Physical Activity through Schools’, in J. McKenna and C. Riddoch (eds) Perspectives on Health and Exercise, pp. 181-201. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan .

13.

Gallahue, D. and Cleland-Donnelly, F. (2003) Developmental Physical Education for All Children. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics .

14.

Hannaford, C. (1995) Smart Moves: Why Learning is Not All in your Head. Arlington, VA: Great Ocean Publishers .

15.

Hardman, K. and Marshall, J. (2000) ‘The State and Status of Physical Education in the International Context’ , European Physical Education Review 6(3): 203-229 .

16.

Herholz, B. , Buskies, B. , Rist, M. , Pawlick, G. , Hollman, W. and Heiss, W. (1987) ‘Regional Cerebral Blood Flow in Man at Rest and during Exercise’ , Journal of Neurology 234: 9-13 .

17.

Kirk, D. (1991) ‘Daily Physical Education Research: A Review and Critique’, in Daily Physical Education: Collected Papers on Health Based Physical Education in Australia. Geelong: Deakin University Press .

18.

Light, R. (2002) ‘Engaging the Body in Learning: Promoting Cognition in Games through TGfU’ , ACHPER Healthy Lifestyles Journal 49: 2 .

19.

Peterson, R. and Felton-Collins, V. (1986) The Piaget Handbook for Teachers and Parents. New York: Teachers College Press .

20.

Pratt, M. , Macera, C. and Blanton, C. (1999) ‘Levels of Physical Activity and Inactivity in Children and Adults in the United States, Current Evidence and Research Issues’ , Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise 31(11): S526-S533 .

21.

SACSA Framework (2005) located at http://www.sacsa.sa.edu.au/index_fsrc.asp?t=CB, accessed 20 March 2005.

22.

Sallis, J. , McKenzie, T. , Kolody, M. , Lewis, M. , Marshall, S. and Rosengard, P. (1999) ‘Effects of Health-Related Physical Education on Academic Achievement: Project SPARK’ , Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 70(2): 127-134 .

23.

Shephard, R. , Lavallee, H. , Volle, M. , LaBarre, R. and Beaucage, C. (1994) ‘Academic Skills and Required Physical Education: The Trois Rivieres Experience’ , CAHPER Res. Suppl. 1(1): 1-12 .

24.

Sibley, B. and Etnier, J. (2003) ‘The Relationship between Physical Activity and Cognition in Children: A Meta-Analysis’ , Pediatric Exercise Science 15: 243-256 .

25.

Troiano, R. and Flegal, K. (1998) ‘Overweight Children and Adolescents, Description, Epidemiology, and Demographics’ , Pediatrics 101: 497-504 .

26.

Wilson, B. (2002) ‘Curriculum: Is Less More?’ , in New Radicalism: Making Education Priority , Report of the Ninth Annual Conference of the Curriculum Corporation. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.