LeapeBatesCullenSystems analysis of adverse drug events. JAMA1995; 1(No 274) at 35
2.
[1957] 2 All ER 118
3.
Ibid, at 122
4.
HawkinsC. Mishap or Malpractice? Oxford: Medical Defence Union, Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1985: p 115
5.
[1947] KB 598; [1947] 1 All ER 633
6.
See also the recent case of Ritchie v. Chichester Health Authority [1994] 5 Med LR 187
7.
Hawkins, op cit at 120
8.
Chin Keow v. Government of Malaysia [1967] 1 WLR 813
9.
158 SE 2d 548 (NC, 1968). See also Paul v. Boschenstein 482 NYS 2d 870 (App Div, 1984)
10.
MannRD. Unlicensed medicines and the use of drugs in unlicensed indications. In: GoldbergADodds-SmithI, eds. Pharmaceutical Medicine and the Law.London: RCP, 1991: p 103
11.
Richards v. Upjohn Co 625 P 2d 1192 (Ct App, 1980)
12.
MedawarC. Power and Dependence: Social Audit on the Safety of Medicines.London: Social Audit Ltd, Bath Press, 1992: p 236
13.
Hawkins, op cit at 123
14.
Pharmacists urge sole right to dispensing [article]. Doctor 1987 (19 February)
15.
[1989] Med LR 36
16.
The Act amends section 58 of the Medicines Act 1968
17.
Section 2(3)
18.
HellerT. Poor Health, Rich Profits: Multinational Drug Companies and the Third World.Nottingham: Spokesman Books, 1977: pp 20–21
19.
BecleyL. Assessing new drugs. Practitioner1983; 227: 1527
20.
[1993] 4 Med LR 151
21.
See also the leading case of Sidaway v. Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital [1985] AC 871; [1985] 1 All ER 643. This case concerned the risks of surgery, rather than drug therapy, but the principles it established apply to both types of treatment
22.
532 P 2d 1377 (Oklahoma, 1974)
23.
[1991] 3 Med LR 33; [1991] SLT (notes) 94
24.
[1983] 127 Solicitors Journal 805; [1983] Times, 12 November
25.
HerxheimerYoung. A prescriber's duty of care. New Law Journal1990; 140: 859
