McKeeMClarkeA. Guidelines, enthusiams, uncertainty, and the limits to purchasing. BMJ1995; 310: 101–104
3.
HurwitzB. Clinical guidelines: proliferation and medico-legal significance. Quality in Health Care1994; 3: 37–44
4.
Early v. Newham Health Authority [1994] 5 Med LR 215–217
5.
IrvineJPetchM. Fitness to drive: updated guidelines for cardiovascular fitness in vocational drivers. Health Trends1994; 26: 38–40
6.
GoldROliverM. Fitness to drive: updated guidance on cardiac conditions in vocational drivers and other drivers. Health Trends1989; 21: 88–89
7.
FieldMLohrK. Clinical practice guidelines. Directions for a new program. Washington: Institute of Medicine1990; 8, 37
8.
Clinical guidelines: a report by a working group set up by the Clinical Resource and Audit Group. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office National Health Service in Scotland 1993
9.
EddyD. Desiging a practice policy: standards, guidelines, and options. JAMA1990; 263: 3077–3084
10.
Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority Code of Practice. Document ref CH(91)5 London: Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority 1991; 1
11.
Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 2 All ER 118–128 at 122
12.
Sidaway v. Board of Governors of the Bethlem and the Maudsley Hospital [1985] 1 All ER 643
13.
HodgkinsonT. Expert evidence: law and practice. London: Sweet and Maxwell1990; 137
14.
HowardMCraneP. Phipson on evidence. London: Sweet and Maxwell1982; 562
15.
Hunter v. Hanley [1955] SC 200 (Court of Session). In: KennedyIGrubbA. Medical law: text and materials. London: Butterworths1989; 420
16.
Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland (Guardian ad litem) [1993] 1 All ER 821
17.
Medical Ethics Committee of the British Medical Association. Discussion paper on treatment of patients in persistent vegetative state. (Manuscript of consultation document in BMA). London: British Medical Association 1992
18.
TongR. The epistemology and ethics of consensus: uses and misues of ‘ethical’ expertise. J Med Philos1991; 16: 409–426
19.
Loveday v. Renton and Wellcome Foundation Ltd (QBD) [1990] 1 Med LR 117–205. Obiter here means that this particular reasoning was not central to the main issues which the court had to decide, namely: whether whooping cough vaccine could cause brain damage.
20.
Cranley v. Medical Board of Western Australia (Sup Ct WA). [1992] 3 Med LR 94–113
21.
DallyA. A doctor's story. London: Macmillan1990; 127, 164
22.
SmithRG. Medical discipline: the professional conduct jurisdiction of the General Medical Council, 1858–1990. Oxford: Clarendon Press1994; 71
23.
Crawford v. Board of Governors of Charing Cross Hospital [1953] In: MasonJSmithR McCall, Eds. Law and medical ethics. London: Butterworths1991; 211
24.
HainesAJonesR. Implementing findings of research. BMJ1994; 308: 1488–1492
25.
DaviesJFreemantleNGrimshawJHurwitzBLongAImplementing clinical practice guidelines: can guidelines be used to improve practice?Effective Health Care Bulletin, 8. Leeds: University of Leeds1994
26.
McDonaldCJOverhageJM. Guidelines you can follow and trust. JAMA1994; 271: 872–873
27.
McFarlane v. Secretary of State for Scotland [1988] SCLR 623–628
28.
CaneP. An introduction to administrative law. Oxford: Clarendon Press1992; 137
29.
Subcommittee of WHO/ISH Mild Hypertension Liaison Committee. Summary of 1993 World Health Organisation — International Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of mild hypertension. BMJ1993; 307: 1541–1546
30.
Quoted in: KinneyEWilderM. Medical standard setting in the current malpractice environment. University of California at Davis Law Review1989; 22: 423, fn. 98, citing Texas & Pac. Ry v. Behymer, 189 US 468, 470 (1903)