Gurol-UrganciICromwellDEdozienL. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG2013; 120: 1516–1525.
2.
Anderson A. Clinical Risk, 2013. Ten years of maternity claims: an analysis of the NHS Litigation Authority data -key findings? cri.sagepub.com.
3.
Davison v Leitch. EWHC 3092 (QB), 2013.
4.
RCOG Greentop guideline 29: the management of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears: RCOG June 2015, www.rcog.org.uk (accessed 12 October 2016).
5.
Intrapartum care, NICE guideline CG190, 2014.
6.
AndrewsVThakarRSultanAH. Are mediolateral episiotomies actually mediolateral?BJOG2005; 112: 1156–1158.
7.
EoganMDalyLO’ConnellPR. Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury?BJOG2006; 113: 190–194.
8.
KalisVKarbanovaJHorakM. The incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy before delivery and after repair. Int J Gynecol Obstet2008; 103: 5–8.
9.
KalisVLandsmanovaJBednarovaB. Evaluation of the incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy at 60 degrees. Int J Gynecol Obstet2011; 112: 220–224.
10.
El-DinASKamalMMAminMA. Comparison between two incision angles of mediolateral episiotomy in primiparous women: a randomised controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res2014; 40: 1877–1882.
11.
FearnleyRABellMDDBodenhamAR. Status of national guidelines in dictating individual clinical practice and defining negligence. Br J Anaesth2012; 108: 557–561.
McPhersonKCBeggsADSultanAH. Can the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) be predicted using a risk-scoring system?BMC Res Notes2014; 7: 471–471.
14.
van RoonYKirwinCRahmanN. Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom. Int J Women’s Health2015; 7: 949–955.
