Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Fishbone diagrams have been widely promoted as a systems-focused hazard analysis tool for use in root cause analysis, but they suffer from a number of structural weaknesses, including a unidirectional structure that only takes into account forces that promote an accident (ignoring those that make the accident less likely or less severe) and a means of displaying these forces that does not convey any difference in strength of influence. In a separate but related issue, many healthcare organizations suffer from a lack of change management expertise.

Proposed solution

To address these concerns, I present a novel technique, the Lovebug diagram, which draws from both Fishbone diagrams and force-field analysis (an approach to analyzing planned change). This new technique adds value to both its progenitor methods, while retaining their key strengths and ease of use. It can be used both prospectively, to assess planned changes, and retrospectively to assess unplanned (accidental) departures from the status quo.

Discussion

The Lovebug diagram is a more powerful analytical tool than its progenitor methods; however, overall adoption of systems-focused tools for root cause analysis remains suboptimal. Additional research is needed to determine how best to promote a truly systems-focused approach to healthcare root cause analysis. Beyond this retrospective use of the technique, it represents a simple tool to assist healthcare organizations with prospective change management.

Keywords

Safety management risk assessment risk management organizational decision making root cause analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Canadian Patient Safety Institute. Canadian incident analysis framework, Edmonton, AB: Canadian Patient Safety Institute, 2012.

ISO 31010:2009. Risk management—risk assessment techniques. Geneva: ISO.

Joint Commission Resources. Root cause analysis in healthcare: tools and techniques, 2nd ed. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission Resources, 2005.

National Patient Safety Agency. Root cause analysis investigation tools guide to investigation report writing following root cause analysis, Event. London: National Patient Safety Agency, 2008, pp. 16–16.

WHO. The WHO patient safety curriculum guide: multi-professional edition, Geneva: WHO, 2011.

Taylor-Adams

Vincent

. Systems analysis of clinical incidents: the London protocol. Clin Risk 2004; 10: 211–220.

Reason

. Managing the risks of organisational accidents, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, 1997.

Carayon

Shoofs Hundt

Karsh

B-T

. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15: i50–i58.

Vincent

. Patient safety, Edinburgh: Elsevier, 2006.

10.

Rasmussen

. Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf Sci 1997; 27: 183–213.

11.

Runciman

Baker

Michel

. Tracing the foundations of a conceptual framework for a patient safety ontology. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19: e56–e56.

12.

Card

Ward

Clarkson

. Beyond FMEA: the structured what-if technique (SWIFT). J Healthc Risk Manage 2012; 31: 23–29.

13.

Card AJ, Ward JR and Clarkson PJ. Generating options for active risk control (GO-ARC): introducing a novel technique. J Healthc Qual. Epub ahead of print 17 June 2013. DOI: 10.1111/jhq.12017.

14.

Kletz T. HAZOP and HAZAN. 4th ed. Rugby, UK: Institution of Chemical Engineers, 2006.

15.

National Patient Safety Agency. Risk assessment programme overview, London: National Patient Safety Agency, 2006.

16.

Hyman

Johnson

. Fault tree analysis of clinical alarms. J Clin Eng 2008; 33: 85–94.

17.

Habraken

MMP

van der Schaaf

. If only … : failed, missed and absent error recovery opportunities in medication errors. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19: 37–41.

18.

Parnes

Fernald

Quintela

. Stopping the error cascade: a report on ameliorators from the ASIPS collaborative. Qual Saf Health Care 2007; 16: 12–16.

19.

Ward J, Clarkson J, Buckle P, et al. Prospective hazard analysis: tailoring prospective methods to a healthcare context, http://www.webcitation.org/6KZ0Y4R8E (2010, accessed 22 October 2013).

20.

Winters

Weaver

Pfoh

. Rapid-response systems as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158: 417–426.

21.

Marshall

Harrison

Flanagan

. The teaching of a structured tool improves the clarity and content of interprofessional clinical communication. Qual Saf Health Care 2009; 18: 137–140.

22.

Thomas

. Force field analysis: a new way to evaluate your strategy. Long Range Plann 1985; 18: 54–59.

23.

Baulcomb

. Management of change through force field analysis. J Nurs Manage 2003; 11: 275–280.

24.

Lewin

. Frontiers in group dynamics: concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Hum Relat 1947; 1: 5–41.

25.

Weiner

. A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implement Sci 2009; 4: 67–67.

26.

Nicolini

Waring

Mengis

. The challenges of undertaking root cause analysis in health care: a qualitative study. J Health Serv Res Policy 2011; 16(Suppl 1): 34–41.

27.

Card

Ward

Clarkson

. Successful risk assessment may not always lead to successful risk control: a systematic literature review of risk control after root cause analysis. J Healthc Risk Manage 2012; 31: 6–12.

28.

Iedema

Jorm

Braithwaite

. A root cause analysis of clinical error: confronting the disjunction between formal rules and situated clinical activity. Soc Sci Med 2006; 63: 1201–1212.

29.

Dixon-Woods

. Why is patient safety so hard? A selective review of ethnographic studies. J Health Serv Res Policy 2010; 15(Suppl 1): 11–16.

30.

Astill

. Ensuring optimal learning from adverse incidents: the importance of a robust serious untoward incident investigation. Clin Risk 2008; 14: 18–20.

31.