Abstract
Although traditionalist critics of same-sex marriage insist that marriage is properly constituted by an essential difference between a man and a woman, appeal to such a difference more comprehensively describes a system of relations among and between men. As a result, a critical analysis of gender complementarity must be developed that focuses on functional relations between men, as those relations become structured by their normative ascription to male-female difference. 'Homosocial' relations must therefore be distinguished from 'homosexual' relations in order to encompass within a concept of desire the whole realm of ways that men interact. Much theological discourse about male-female difference can then be more accurately interpreted as argument about access to encounter with God, and especially about control of such access.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
