TorranceGWThomasWHSackettDL. A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Services Research1972; 7: 118–133
2.
Llewellyn-ThomasHASutherlandHJThielEC. Do patients' evaluations of a future health state change when they actually enter that state?Medical Care1993; 31: 1002–1012
3.
Rutten-van MolkenMPBakkerCHvan DoorslaerEKvan der LindenS. Methodological issues of patient utility measurement: experience from two clinical trials. Medical Care1995; 33: 922–937
4.
HandlerRMHynesLMNeaseRFJr. Effect of locus of control and consideration of future consequences on time tradeoff utilities for current health. Quality of Life Research1997; 6: 54–60
5.
RevickiDAKaplanRM. Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research1993; 2: 477–487
6.
NeaseRFJrTsaiRHynesLMLittenbergB. Automated utility assessment of global health. Quality of Life Research1996; 5: 175–182
7.
HornbergerJCRedelmeierDAPetersenJ. Variability among methods to assess patients' well-being and consequent effect on a cost-effectiveness analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology1992; 45: 505–512
8.
MehrezAGafniA. The healthy-years equivalents: how to measure them using the standard gamble approach. Medical Decision Making1991; 11: 140–146
9.
NicholGLlewellyn-ThomasHAThielECNaylorCD. The relationship between cardiac functional capacity and patients' symptom-specific utilities for angina: some findings and methodologic lessons. Medical Decision Making1995; 16: 78–85
10.
StiggelboutAMKiebertGMKievitJLeerJWHabbemaJDde HaesJC. The ‘utility’ of the time trade-off method in cancer patients: feasibility and proportional trade-off. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology1995; 48: 1207–1214
11.
UbelPALoewensteinGScanlonDKamletM. Individual utilities are inconsistent with rationing choices: a partial explanation of why Oregon's cost-effectiveness list failed. Medical Decision Making1996; 16: 108–116
