BlackNA. A national research and development strategy: Lessons from England. Annual Review of Public Health (in press).
2.
Department of Health. Research for health, 1st ed.London: Department of Health, 1991.
3.
Department of Health. Research for health, 2nd ed.London: Department of Health, 1993.
4.
TennisonB. What do purchasers of health care want from health services research?Journal of Health Services Research and Policy1996; 1: 126–127.
5.
House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. Priorities in medical research. Report of sub-committee II. London: HMSO, 1988.
6.
BlackN A. The relationship between evaluative research and audit. Journal of Public Health Medicine1992; 14: 361–366.
7.
KnutsonKLewoldSRobertssonOLidgrenL. The Swedish knee arthroplasty register: A nationwide study of 30 003 knees 1976–92. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica1994; 65: 375–386.
8.
RowanK R. Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre — past, present and future. Care of the Critically Ill1994; 10: 148–149.
9.
SochartD HLongA LPorterM L. Joint responsibility: The need for a national arthroplasty register. British Medical Journal1996; 313: 66–67.