Implementing patient navigator programmes within a hospital setting in Toronto,Canada: A qualitative interview study

Abstract

Objectives:

This study sought to identify the organisation and system level barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of patient navigator programmes in one acute care hospital system in Toronto, Canada.

Methods:

A qualitative descriptive approach informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Data were collected using in-depth interviews and analysed thematically.

Results:

Thirty-eight individuals participated in interviews (17 community, 21 acute care hospital), including 24 frontline clinicians and 14 programme directors, health care leaders and managers. Implementation of patient navigator programmes was dependent on: (1) a clear consensus on the unique need for patient navigators; (2) champions to promote patient navigation; (3) programme ownership and accountability; (4) external system and organisational landscape and (5) implementation climate. Appropriate mechanisms of communication were found to have impacted each factor as a barrier or facilitator to programme implementation.

Conclusion:

Strategies for implementing patient navigator programmes into hospital clinical practice should include incorporating evidence to support the programme, considering mechanisms to enable collaborative communication, and the integration of frameworks to facilitate programme integration into the current practices within the organisation.

Keywords

qualitative implementation patient navigation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Monaco

Palmer

Marengoni

, et al. Integrated care for the management of ageing-related non-communicable diseases: current gaps and future directions. Aging Clin Exp Res 2020; 32: 1353–1358.

Nalder

Fleming

Cornwell

, et al. Linked lives: the experiences of family caregivers during the transition from hospital to home following traumatic brain injury. Brain Imp 2012; 1: 108–122.

Giosa

Stolee

Dupuis

, et al. An examination of family caregiver experiences during care transitions of older adults. Can J Aging/La Revue canad du vieillissement 2014; 33: 137–153.

Carter

Valaitis

Lam

, et al. Navigation delivery models and roles of navigators in primary care: a scoping literature review. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18: 96.

Freeman

. The history, principles, and future of patient navigation: commentary. Semin Oncol Nurs 2013; 29: 72–75.

Louart

Bonnet

Ridde

. Is patient navigation a solution to the problem of leaving no one behind? A scoping review of evidence from low-income countries. Health Policy Plan 2020; 36: 101–116.

Corrigan

Pickett

Batia

, et al. Peer navigators and integrated care to address ethnic health disparities of people with serious mental illness. Soc Work Public Health 2014; 29: 581–593.

McBrien

Ivers

Barnieh

, et al. Patient navigators for people with chronic disease: a systematic review. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0191980.

Lubetkin

Krebs

, et al. Exploring primary care providers’ interest in using patient navigators to assist in the delivery of tobacco cessation treatment to low income, ethnic/racial minority patients. J Commun Health 2010; 35: 618–624.

10.

Jandorf

Cooperman

Stossel

, et al. Implementation of culturally targeted patient navigation system for screening colonoscopy in a direct referral system. Health Educ Res 2013; 28: 803–815.

11.

Freund

. Implementation of evidence-based patient navigation programs. Acta Oncol 2017; 56: 123–127.

12.

Valaitis

Carter

Lam

, et al. Implementation and maintenance of patient navigation programs linking primary care with community-based health and social services: a scoping literature review. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17: 116.

13.

Damschroder

Aron

Keith

, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009; 4: 1–15.

14.

Sandelowski

. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 2000; 23: 334–340.

15.

Marshall

. The key informant technique. Fam Pract 1996; 13: 92–97.

16.

Tong

Sainsbury

Craig

. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19: 349–357.

17.

Etikan

Musa

Alkassim

. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am J Theoret Appl Statist 2016; 5: 1–4.

18.

Etikan

Alkassim

Abubakar

. Comparison of snowball sampling and sequential sampling technique. Biometrics Biostatistics Int J 2016; 3: 55.

19.

Birks

Chapman

Francis

. Memoing in qualitative research: Probing data and processes. J Res Nurs 2008; 13: 68–75.

20.

Braun

Clarke

. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol 2020; 18: 1–25.

21.

Bazeley

Jackson

. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London: SAGE publications limited, 2013.

22.

Hendy

Barlow

. The role of the organizational champion in achieving health system change. Social Sci Med 2012; 74: 348–355.

23.

Bambacas

Patrickson

. Interpersonal communication skills that enhance organisational commitment. J Commun Manage 2008; 12: 51–72.

24.

Lukas

Holmes

Cohen

, et al. Transformational change in health care systems: an organizational model. Health Care Manage Rev 2007; 32: 309–320.

25.

Burke

. Organization change: theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications, 2017.

26.

Colbry

Hurwitz

Adair

. Collaboration theory. J Leadersh Educ 2014; 13: 63–75.

27.

McKinnon

. A case for public-private partnerships in health: lessons from an honest broker. Prev Chronic Dis 2009; 6: A72.

28.

Poland

Graham

Walsh

, et al. ‘Working at the margins’ or ‘leading from behind’? a Canadian study of hospital− community collaboration. Health Soc Care Community 2005; 13: 125–135.

29.

Cheung

Yiu

Lam

. Interweaving trust and communication with project performance. J Construct Eng Manage 2013; 139: 941–950.

30.

Xyrichis

Lowton

. What fosters or prevents interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care? A literature review. Int J Nurs Stud 2008; 45: 140–153.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.57 MB