Patient engagement in health technology assessment: what constitutes ‘meaningful’ and how we might get there

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abelson

Forest

P-G

Casebeer

et al.

Towards more informed, meaningful and effective public consultation: an evaluation of regional health authorities in Canada. Canada: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, 2001–2003.

Rozmovits

Mai

Chambers

et al . What does meaningful look like? A qualitative study of patient engagement at the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: perspectives of reviewers and payers. J Health Serv Res Policy 2018; 23(1).

Gauvin

Abelson

Giacomini

et al . “ It all depends”: conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies. Soc Sci Med 2010; 70: 1518–1526.

Gagnon

Desmartis

Lepage-Savary

et al . Introducing patients’ and the public’s perspectives to health technology assessment: a systematic review of international experiences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011; 27: 31–42.

Moran

and Davidson

An uneven spread: a review of public involvement in the National Institute of Health Research’s Health Technology Assessment program. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011; 27: 343–347.

Hailey

Werko

Bakri

et al . Involvement of consumers in health technology assessment activities by Inahta agencies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2013; 29: 79–83.

Whitty

JA.

An international survey of the public engagement practices of health technology assessment organizations. Value Health 2013; 16: 155–163.

Messina

and Grainger

DL.

A pilot study to identify areas for further improvements in patient and public involvement in health technology assessments for medicines. Patient 2012; 5: 199–211.

Abelson

Wagner

DeJean

et al . Public and patient involvement in HTA: framework for action. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2016; 32: 4.

10.

Lopes

Street

et al . Involving patients in health technology funding decisions: stakeholder perspectives on processes used in Australia. Health Expect 2016; 19: 331–344.

11.

Scott

and Wale

JL.

Patient advocate perspectives on involvement in HTA: an international snapshot. Res Involv Engagem 2017; 3: 2.

12.

Abelson

Forest

P-G

Eyles

et al . Will it make a difference if I show up and share?’ Citizen perspectives on improving public involvement in health system decision making. J Health Serv Res Policy 2004; 9: 205–212.