Consent to treatment in the UK: time for practice to reflect the law

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, 2015. UKSC 11.

GMC. Consent guidance: patients and doctors making decisions together, www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/consent_guidance_index.asp (accessed 15 November 2014).

DH. Reference guide to consent for examination or treatment, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/reference-guide-to-consent-for-examination-or-treatment-second-edition (2009, accessed 21 January 2016).

Reibl v Hughes, 1980. 2 SCR 880.

Rogers v Whitaker, 1992. 175 CLR 479.

Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee, 1957. 1 WLR 582.

Sidaway v. Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital, 1985. AC 871.

Grady

. Enduring and Emerging Challenges of Informed Consent. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 855–862.

Sokol

. Let’s stop consenting patients. Br Med J 2014; 348: g2192–g2192.

10.

Doherty

Stavropoulou

Saunders

MNK

. The consent process: enabling or disabling patients’ active participation? Health. Epub ahead of print October 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1363459315611870.

11.

Kennedy

. The Report of the public inquiry into children’s heart surgery at the Bristol royal infirmary 1984–1995. CM 5207, London: The Stationery Office, 2001.

12.

Redfern

. The royal Liverpool children's inquiry report (the Redfern report), London: The Stationery Office, 2001.