The enactment of knowledge translation: a study of the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care initiative within the English National Health Service
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2013
The enactment of knowledge translation: a study of the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care initiative within the English National Health Service
We contribute to existing knowledge translation (KT) literature by developing the notion of ‘enactment’ and illustrate this through an interpretative, comparative case-study analysis of three Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) initiatives. We argue for a focus on the way in which the CLAHRC model has been ‘enacted’ as central to the different KT challenges and capabilities encountered.
Methods
A comparative, mixed method study created a typology of enactments (Classical, Home-grown and Imported) using qualitative analysis and social network analysis.
Results
We identify systematic differences in the enactment of the CLAHRC model. The sources of these different enactments are subsequently related to variation in formative interpretations and leadership styles, the implementation of different governance structures, and the relative epistemic differences between the professional groups involved.
Conclusions
Enactment concerns the creative agency of individuals and groups in constituting a particular context for their work through their local interpretation of a particular KT model. Our theory of enactment goes beyond highlighting variation between CLAHRCs, to explore the mechanisms that influence the way a particular model is interpreted and acted upon. We thus encourage less focus on conceptual models and more on the formative role played by leaders of KT initiatives.
CookseyD. A review of UK health research funding, London: HM Treasury, 2006.
2.
DuncanRWeissAOrganizational learning: implications for organizational design. In: StawBMCummingsL (eds). Research in organizational behaviour, Greenwich: JAI Press, 1979.
3.
NewellSEdelmanLScarbroughH. ‘Best practice' development and transfer in the NHS: The importance of process as well as product knowledge. Health Services Manag Res2003; 16: 1–12.
4.
DopsonSFitzgeraldL. Knowledge to action? Evidence-based health care in context, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
5.
LomasJ. Connecting research and policy. Can J Policy Res2000; 1: 140–144.
6.
GkeredakisESwanJPowellJ. Mind the gap: understanding utilisation of evidence and policy in health care management practice. J Health Org Manag2011; 25: 298–314.
7.
GreenhalghTWieringaS. Is it time to drop the ‘knowledge translation’metaphor? A critical literature review. JRSM2011; 104: 501–509.
8.
NicoliniDPowellJConvilleP. Managing knowledge in the health care sector. A review. Int J Manag Rev2008; 10: 245–263.
9.
PopeCRobertGBateP. Lost in translation: a multi‐level case study of the metamorphosis of meanings and action in public sector organizational innovation. Public Admin2006; 84: 59–79.
10.
LangESWyerPCHaynesRB. Knowledge translation: closing the evidence-to-practice gap. Ann Emerg Med2007; 49: 355–363.
11.
DavisDDavisMEJadadA. The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. BMJ2003; 327: 33–35.
12.
GrahamIDTetroeJ. Some theoretical underpinnings of knowledge translation. Acad Emerg Med2007; 14: 936–941.
13.
CrillyTJashaparaAFerlieE. Research utilisation and knowledge mobilisation: a scoping review of the literature. Report for the National Institute for Health Research Service Delivery and Organisation Programme, Southampton: NIHR SDO, 2010.
14.
RynesSLBartunekJMDaftRL. Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Acad Manag J2001; 44: 340–355.
15.
FerlieEFitzgeraldLWoodM. The nonspread of innovations: the mediating role of professionals. Acad Manag J2005; 48: 117–134.
16.
GrolR. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care2001; 39: II-46–II-54.
17.
LomasJ. Using research to inform health care managers' and policy makers' questions: from summative to interpretive synthesis. Health Care Policy2005; 1: 55–71.
18.
SchusterMAMcGlynnEABrookRH. How good is the quality of health care in the United States?Milbank Q2005; 83: 843–895.
19.
Swan J, Clarke A, Nicolini D, et al. Evidence in management decisions (EMD) – advancing knowledge utilization in healthcare management. Final report. NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research programme, 2012.
20.
Crilly T, Jashapara A, Trenholm S, et al. Knowledge mobilisation in healthcare organisations: synthesising the evidence and theory using perspectives of organisational form, resource based view of the firm and critical theory. NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research programme, 2013.
21.
GrahamIDLoganJHarrisonMB. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?J Contin Educ Health Prof2006; 26: 13–24.
22.
GrolRGrimshawJ. Evidence-based implementation of evidence-based medicine. Jt Comm J Qual Improv1999; 25: 503–503.
23.
KontosPCPolandBD. Mapping new theoretical and methodological terrain for knowledge translation: contributions from critical realism and the arts. Implement Sci2009; 4: 1–10.
24.
NicoliniD. Stretching out and expanding work practices in time and space: the case of telemedicine. Hum Relat2007; 60: 889–920.
25.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Developing a CIHR Framework to Measure the Impact of Health Research: A synthesis report of meetings. 23 and 24 February and 18 May 2005.
26.
ObornEDawsonS. Knowledge and practice in multidisciplinary teams: struggle, accommodation and privilege. Hum Relat2010; 63: 1835–1857.
27.
MittonCAdairCEMcKenzieE. Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Q2007; 85: 729–768.
28.
GrimshawJMEcclesMPLavisJN. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci2012; 7: 50–50.
29.
GrintK. Problems, problems, problems: the social construction of ‘leadership’. Hum Relat2005; 58: 1467–1494.
30.
FeredayJMuir-CochraneE. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Meth2008; 5: 80–92.
31.
Knorr CetinaK. Epistemic cultures. How the sciences make knowledge, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.
32.
FriedsonE. Profession of medicine, New York: Dodd, Mead, 1970.
33.
WestMAWallaceM. Innovation in health care teams. Eur J Soc Psychol1991; 21: 303–315.
34.
ReagansRZuckermanEW. Networks, diversity, and productivity: the social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ Sci2001; 12: 502–17.
35.
ObstfeldD. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin Sci Q2005; 50: 100–130.
36.
CrossRRiceREParkerA. Information seeking in social context: structural influences and receipt of information benefits. Appl Rev Part C IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern2001; 31: 438–448.
37.
HansonJKrackhardtD. Informal networks: the company behind the chart. Harvard Business Rev1993; 71: 104–111.
38.
CrossRBorgattiSPParkerA. Beyond answers: dimensions of the advice network. Social Netw2001; 23: 215–235.
39.
BorgattiSPEverettMGFreemanLC. UCINET 6 for Windows, Harvard: Analytic Technologies, 2002.
40.
IrwinMDHughesHL. Centrality and the structure of urban interaction: measures, concepts, and applications. Soc Forces1992; 71(1): 17–51.
TichyNMTushmanMLFombrunC. Social network analysis for organizations. Acad Manag Rev1979; 4(4): 507–519.
43.
TurkH. Organizations in modern life, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977.
44.
BaldassarriDDianiM. The integrative power of civic networks 1. Am J Sociol2007; 113: 735–780.
45.
Friedkin NE. A structural theory of social influence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
46.
BorgattiSPEverettMG. Models of core/periphery structures. Soc Netw2000; 21: 375–395.
47.
HawePShiellARileyT. Complex interventions: how “out of control” can a randomised controlled trial be?BMJ2004; 328: 1561–1561.
48.
McGivernGLambrianouAFerlieE. Enacting evidence into clinical practice: the case of coronary heart disease. Public Money Manag2009; 29: 307–312.
49.
WeickKE. Sensemaking in organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.
50.
PinchTJBijkerWEThe social construction of facts and artifacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In: BijkerWEHughesTPinchTJ (eds). The social construction of technological systems, London: MIT Press, 1987.
51.
CampbellMFitzpatrickRHainesA. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ2000; 321(7262): 694–694.
