Developing engagement,linkage and exchange between health services managers and researchers: Experience from the UK

Abstract

Objectives

The UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Service Delivery and Organisation (SDO) Management Fellowship programme enabled health services managers and university researchers to collaborate on research projects with the aim of improving research, managers’ research knowledge and skills, and the use of research in management. Our aim was to evaluate whether the programme encouraged greater engagement, linkage and exchange between researchers and managers.

Methods

A case-study approach with each case-study centred on 11 health care managers appointed as Fellows, chief investigators (n = 13) and Fellows’ line managers (n = 12). Data were collected through semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews. Interviews were analysed thematically to explore the impact of the programme, reported issues and to identify any lessons learned.

Results

Researchers benefited from the flow of (insider) knowledge and contacts from the workplace via the Fellow to the project. Engagement, linkage and exchange as a result of the Fellowship were less developed for the workplace. Reasons for this related to the fit of the research project with workplace interests, Fellows’ contact with the health care organization, feedback structures and training. The potential for co-production of knowledge was under-developed. A transactional notion of exchange was found in operation in workplaces.

Conclusions

The programme’s aim to enhance engagement, linkage and exchange was largely achieved, although exchange tended to be narrowly conceived. Knowing how models of exchange work in practice can ensure effort is put to best use.

Keywords

knowledge exchange knowledge transfer researcher-practitioner collaborations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme. SDO management fellowships – evaluation of a knowledge mobilisation and capacity building initiative. Research brief (ref: Mf261): call for proposals. Southampton: SDO, University of Southampton, 2009.

Lavis

Davies

Oxman

. Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005; 10: 35–48.

Petticrew

Whitehead

Macintyre

. Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 1: the reality according to policymakers. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004; 58: 811–816.

Ward

House

Hamer

. Knowledge brokering: exploring the process of transferring knowledge into action. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9: 12–12.

Lomas

. Improving research dissemination and uptake in the health sector: beyond the sound of one hand clapping. Policy Commentary C 1997; 97: 1–45.

Nutley S. Bridging the policy/research divide: reflections and lessons from the UK. In: Facing the future: engaging stakeholders and citizens in developing public policy, National Institute of Governance Conference, Canberra, Australia, 23–24 April 2003.

Antil

Desrochers

Joubert

. Implementation of an innovative grant programme to build partnerships between researchers, decision-makers and practitioners: the experience of the Quebec Social Research Council. J Health Serv Res Policy 2003; 8: 35–43.

Ross

Lavis

Rodriguez

. Partnership experiences: involving decision-makers in the research process. J Health Serv Res Policy 2003; 8: 26–34.

Walter

Davies

Nutley

. Increasing research impact through partnerships: evidence from outside health care. J Health Serv Res Policy 2003; 8: 58–61.

10.

Garland

Plemmons

Koontz

. Research–practice partnership in mental health: lessons from participants. Adm Policy Ment Health 2006; 33: 517–528.

11.

Gagnon

. Moving knowledge to action through dissemination and exchange. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 64: 25–31.

12.

Bullock

Morris

Atwell

. Collaboration between health service managers and researchers: making a difference? J Health Serv Res Policy 2012; 17: 2–10.

13.

Mitchell

Pirkis

Hall

. Partnerships for knowledge exchange in health services research, policy and practice. J Health Serv Res Policy 2009; 14: 104–111.

14.

Nutley

Walter

Davies

. From knowing of doing: a framework for understanding the evidence-into-practice agenda. Evaluation 2003; 9: 125–148.

15.

Davies

Nutley

Walter

. Why ‘knowledge transfer’ is misconceived for applied social research. J Health Serv Res Policy 2008; 13: 188–190.

16.

NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation (SDO) Programme. Knowledge mobilisation and capacity building (km/cb). Southampton: SDO, http://www.sdo.nihr.ac.uk/knowledgemobilisationcapacitybuilding.html (2011, accessed 9 September 2011).

17.

NIRH Service Delivery and Organisation (SDO) Programme. Call for applications for SDO management fellowships. Southampton: SDO, University of Southampton, nd.

18.

Government Social Research Unit. The Magenta Book: guidance notes for policy evaluation and analysis, London: Government Social Research Unit, 2007.

19.

Kirkpatrick

. Techniques for evaluating training programs. Training Dev J 1979; 33: 78–92.

20.

Nadin

Cassell

Using data matrices. In: Cassell

Symon

(eds). Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research, London: Sage Publications, 2004, pp. 271–287.

21.

Bullock A, Morris ZS and Atwell C. A formative evaluation of the NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation (SDO) management fellowships. Final Report. NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme, http://www.netscc.ac.uk/hsdr/projdetails.php?ref = 09-1003-01 (2012, accessed 27 February 2013).

22.

Estabrooks

Thompson

Lovely

. A guide to knowledge translation theory. J Contin Educ Health 2006; 26: 25–36.

23.

Denis

Lehoux

Hivon

. Creating a new articulation between research and practice through policy? The views and experiences of researchers and practitioners. J Health Serv Res Policy 2003; 8: 44–50.

24.

Crosswaite

Curtice

. Disseminating research results-the challenge of bridging the gap between health research and health action. Health Promot Int 1994; 9: 289–296.

25.

Lomas

. The in-between world of knowledge brokering. BMJ 2007; 334: 129–132.

26.

Kramer

Cole

Leithwood

. Doing knowledge transfer: engaging management and labor with research on employee health and safety. Bull Sci Technol Soc 2004; 24: 316–330.

27.

Bero

Grilli

Grimshaw

. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote implementation of research findings by health care professionals. BMJ 1998; 317: 465–468.

28.

Jacobson

Butterill

Goering

. Development of a framework for knowledge translation: understanding user context. J Health Serv Res Policy 2003; 8: 94–99.

29.

NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Effective health care: getting evidence into practice, York: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, 1999.

30.

Dobbins

Robeson

Ciliska

. A description of a knowledge broker role implemented as part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating three knowledge translation strategies. Implement Sci 2009; 4: 23–31.

31.

Baumbusch

Kirkham

Khan

. Pursuing common agendas: a collaborative model for knowledge translation between research and practice in clinical settings. Res Nurs Health 2008; 31: 130–140.