Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper uses ProQuest’s Entertainment Industry Magazine Archive (EIMA) to explore the use of the term ‘cinematic’ in games promotion in the decade 1990–1999. It offers a clear platform for linguistically aligned archival studies and charts the use of terminology as it emerged and changed within the period of study. Adding nuance to claims that the 1990s saw promotional convergence between games and film, this paper uses a language-oriented archival methodology to highlight how the notions of industrial convergence may be seen as incremental developments rather than sudden shifts in promotional discourse. In exploring how game promotion used terms associated with and emerging from the cinema, the paper maps the ways in which games promotion solicited and distinguished itself from a competing industry, drawing attention to the complexities of mediatised convergence and public versus industrial discourse. In highlighting and extrapolating key moments within the corpus, this paper identifies several areas of future study and serves as a call for further study into games promotion.

Keywords

games promotion convergence cinematic archives

Introduction

The 1990s was a dynamic time for the videogame industry. Many significant franchises established in the decade still resonate culturally and economically to this day – for example, Mortal Kombat (1993), Tomb Raider (1996) and Grand Theft Auto (1997) – and have all since become entwined with the Hollywood film industry. Collectively they represent a manifestation of converged industrial logic, visible through franchising, marketing and promotional practices that all mirror those of the film industry.

More widely, the decade saw several promotional events physically and culturally encroach on the movie industry’s spaces and practices. Press releases and news articles make special note of games being advertised in particular ways within cinema spaces and with modes of address from established cinema practices. Announcements associated with promotional launches and press releases for new campaigns suggest a novelty in the approaches used: from the 1995 fanfare of PlayStation consoles being promoted with interactive stands in cinema lobbies and entrances (Consumer Electronics, 1995), to Wing Commander’s IV’s (1996) announcement that the game will be promoted on the cinema screen with a ‘movie style’ campaign (Jebens, 1996). Within such spatial incursions into existing entertainment spaces is a concerted attempt towards positioning games in the same manner as cinema. Mortal Kombat (1993) was promoted with a launch event that included the first videogame ‘trailer’ in cinemas (Vollans, 2017). The release event, coined ‘Mortal Monday’, implicitly borrowed the cultural association of cinema violence, while soliciting the same kind of moral panic (Church, 2022). Shortly thereafter, 1994 saw Sega launch a TV channel for interactive games, in a move that predates post-millennial streaming service business models (Shaw and Gurman, 2021). This was touted in industry press as taking ‘its cue from Sega’s aggressive video store distribution strategy’ (Silverman, 1994). By the end of the decade, Variety Magazine reported that the games industry’s revenue nearly matched that of Hollywood: USD $7.2b for games, while film generated USD $7.4b (Graser, 2000). Collectively, such events can be understood within a wider process of ‘remediation’, defined by Bolter and Grusin, who observed that this catalysed the speed of technological development in 1990s (1999: 5).

However, as Mc Glynn has recently observed, ‘many recent releases illustrate that a shift has taken place towards certain games’ stylistic harnessing and hybridisation of cinematic idioms that, in turn, transform the experience being marketed to gamers’ (2023: 108). Calling this a form of aspirational cinematic promise, Mc Glynn posits this as ‘the latent aspiration to evoke the sights and sonorities of contemporary Hollywood film that persists throughout the development and marketing of so many video games’ (2023: 109). This position is echoed in the popular press, with a special issue of The Economist (2023) noting that making a blockbuster game is akin to making blockbuster movies. Yet, in both cases, this is positioned as a recent development in the 2020s, overlooking the sorts of established and antecedent practices illustrated above. Within the 1990s melting pot of opportunity and industrial crossover, this cinematic promise exists quite clearly and can be understood as a remediatory practice indicative of converging industrial logic. Terms rooted within film industry promotion start being used within and alongside games promotion as a way of framing the novelty of the promotion as much as the legitimacy of the product. ‘Cinematic’ and ‘film-style’ are both used to promote one industry’s output in the language of another, while the kinds of promotion available start to mirror those of film.

In 2002, King and Krzywinska asked ‘is there a merging of languages, to some extent, as games influence movies and movies influence games?’ (1). The answer is undoubtedly: yes. Yet, within such research on this process of ‘merging’, there remains a focus on aesthetics. As Hay and Couldry (2011) note, the development of cultural studies, via McLuhan (1964) and Hall (1980), positions an understanding of media as a language, and as a system of codes through which meaning is made and shaped. Work has focused on the aesthetic ‘language’ of new media through the work of Bolter and Grusin (1999); King and Krzywinska (2002); Manovich (2002) and many more too numerous to mention. By contrast, Thurlow and Mroczek (2011) and Crystal (2001) have looked at language formation within new media, the use of written and spoken language as influenced by and through technology. Within the discourse is a logical area for further development. As new products – be they platforms or outputs – come to the market, promotional content circulates in advance, offering ways to conceptualise, understand and consume them. As Bolter and Grusin note ‘all mediation is remediation’ (1999: 55), it follows that the promotional mediation of product on the marketplace forms a site ‘of a specific practice, at a specific time’ (1999: 21). Here the specific time can be twofold, either the point in the promotional campaign (as related to the product) and/or the time at which that product comes to be (the wider industrial chronology). Focusing on the language (or ‘copy’) used in promotional materials offers another lens to view such converged media practices. It offers the tantalising possibility of being able to chart the moments of convergence and remediation linked to very specific moments in time.

This article offers an exploration of the linguistic ways in which promotional materials framed the videogame industry’s wares in relation to the film industry. To do this, it focuses on the use and context of the term ‘cinematic’, sourcing examples of suitable promotional materials from ProQuest’s Entertainment Industry Magazine Archive (EIMA), a database that includes digitisations of select UK and US Gaming and entertainment magazines. Combining these sources with wider supporting context from the larger Nexis newspaper archive, it explores the ways in which promotion and markers of converged industrial logic exist in the mundane, everyday ways a consumer might encounter them in the 1990s. In charting moments of promotional convergence this paper highlights an overlooked history of the games industry and identifies areas of further study. It acts as both an exploratory and historical study, but acknowledges the limitations and scope of the task, calling for further studies of promotion and language. Through focusing on terminology as both promotional and a form of articulation of an industrial identity, this article adds nuance to studies of converging media practices. It focuses on the specific ways in which convergence occurs linguistically, and over time. The lack of context, however, of first-hand industry accounts and production notes, for example, demands further attention and consideration of the tensions at work. Caution should be used in assuming language directly responds to or impacts industrial practice. Such a linguistic mapping is unlikely to be completed in one article, and unlikely to be centred neatly within a single decade. Yet, in making a clear contribution for the purposes of further discussion, this article draws attention to the ways in which the industry framed its wares ahead of consumption.

Why promotion; Why ‘cinematic’?

Studies of industry framing abound, and work has already explored the 1990s from several angles, notably gender and violence. Williams’ (2003) work maps the social construction of games, noting three frames at work 'coverage of designers or producers as auteurs, a “games as artistic” frame and a “technical quality” frame’ (529). Williams offers useful insight into the vilification and redemption of games as a threat to established norms. These frames and discussion therein emerge out of studies of samples of news and media coverage, while promotion is mentioned it does not form the sole focus. Similarly, McKernan (2013) has charted the counter-narrative to violent games, noting the educational framing at work and focusing on the ‘functional benefits’ (323). Here the educational focus is not on offering consumers a frame to discuss new technology, but rather the ‘instrumental value’ of gameplay (321). Similarly, Graeme Kirkpatrick has explored gaming magazine discourse from 1980 to the mid-1990s, focusing on the role magazines played in developing games culture. Kirkpatrick notes magazines form a site of discourse that is not ‘brought into being by the machinations of corporate marketing executives’ (2015: 2). I challenge this claim on principle, as it omits both the role of economics in editorial decisions, and the press release content which is interconnected with such marketing machinations. In doing so, I echo Therrien and Lefebvre who note the ‘blindspot’ (2017: 38). As part of an analysis of the news, letters and articles within the corpus, Kirkpatrick posits a ‘frame of indeterminacy’ in which technology usage is subject to variation, citing 1980–84 as a period of flux as consumers explore the possibilities of the media. Noting the application of such indeterminacy extends to value judgements: ‘people were not in a position to assess what made a “good” game because the frame of reference that would facilitate judgement did not exist.’ (12). Here, then, we can reiterate the focus on promotion, as a function of promotion is to make such claim and do so in a way that enables potential audiences to (ideally) agree. This (dis)agreement logically forms part of the gamer’s identity, a value judgement on the output.

Studies of games promotion exist, exploring framing practices and the construction of the idealised and problematic representations of gamer identity (e.g. Burgess et al., 2011; Condis and Morrissette, 2023), and similarly when discussing game violence (e.g. Scharrer, 2004). But these studies use promotion merely as supporting evidence for wider debates on violence and gender, rather than as the focal points of their respective studies. As Wright puts it, dedicated study of game promotion sits on ‘the margins of (digital) game history’ (2023: 33-51). That is, despite numerous recent research contributions to games promotion and paratexts, including a 2017 Kinephanos special issue on game promotion (Vollans et al., 2017), and recent work on games paratexts (Beil et al., 2021; Seiwald and Vollans, 2023) viewing promotion in its own right as an industrial discourse remains understudied within the field. Some key contributions do exist, though. Young (2007) talks about individual promotional aesthetics and charts the shift in presentation of gamers as part of the promotional rhetoric. Young notes the social-educational capacity of promotion, observing that ‘the purpose of advertising has changed from one of teaching users how to use the system to publicizing specific games in a manner very similar to film trailers’ (235. Cassidy, 2011: 298 also makes this point). Young also points to the possibility of using promotion to educate consumers about the market. We can draw comparisons between Young (2007) and Kirkpatrick (2015), seeing promotion as a mode of stabilising idealised use. Developing this, Švelch (2015) has sought to build a typology of game trailers, basing this on the relationship between the promotion and the product. In these cases, the focus is on the aesthetics of a particular promotional form. These contributions show the value of advertising and promotion, understanding advertising as sites of remediation, but remain rooted in the visual elements. By contrast, Vollans (2015, 2017) has focused on the linguistic, charting the term ‘trailer’ across multiple entertainment industries. Drawing attention to the first game trailer being couched in ‘the cinematic’, Vollans’ (2017) works through press archives to unpack a small part of game history covering a period from the 1990s–2000s. In this study, Vollans implies a light-bulb moment in which games suddenly became promoted through the lens of cinema. For Vollans, language is a data gathering tool used to chart specific instances of specific instance of converged promotion, but the term ‘cinematic’ is never fully interrogated. Beyond this, few studies have such linguistic emphasis. While work on remediation and interaction between games and cinema has developed, few have sought to provide critical analysis to the terms used, though occasionally such terminology has been critiqued (see Wright, 2017). While King and Krzywinska note that ‘cinematic’ is often used to suggest quality 2002, there is a lack of criticality in understanding how and where the term was used. While there are many possible terms to choose from for a focus, ‘cinematic’, in the public use meaning of or pertaining to the cinema, offers only one such starting point.

Methodology

As Wright notes (2023: 36) there is a dearth of dedicated archives that collect and preserve video game paratexts, and fewer still that remain accessible without travel (and the associated costs). For this study, online archival sources are used, in part for convenience, in part to encourage further study and engagement. ProQuest’s Entertainment Industry Magazine Archive (EIMA) holds a digitised collection of magazines organised by 5 thematically grouped collections, across 4 different industries: Music Radio & Stage, Film & TV 1, Film & TV 2, Music Folk & Hip Hop, and Video Gaming. The Video Gaming collection itself comprises 40 titles published between the 1980s and 2000s, but is not a complete archive of magazines across that period. Most of the digitised magazines are those published by Future Publishing Ltd, publishing all but 5 of the magazines archived. EIMA has UK and US editions of the same publication (PC Gamer), introducing the possibility of repetition in the content generated. Repetition is expected in the kinds of content sought however, these magazines are competing with each other for consumer attention, and advertising campaigns are likely to occur across different publications by design. Resultantly, advertising space might be bought as a block across different publications owned by the same company, and/or specific editorial stances within commentary may emerge. As the archive is incomplete, a complete and quantifiable grand narrative, isn’t possible. However, even incomplete archival work can identify trends and areas for future studies. In part composition limitations are a direct result of any archive. Archives privilege some content over others, pointing as Kaltman (2020) and Newman and Simons (2018) do in greater depth and with more nuance towards a need for sustained archival effort.

In using the EIMA, searches are bound by the architecture of the search mechanisms themselves. With many archives, searches may be dominated by the metadata associated with a specific archival entry. With the EIMA, Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is used as part of the digitisation process. When accurate, this allows for specific keywords in the text to be identified and included. The architecture of the EIMA prioritises linguistic framing over metadata, and this supports a language-based approach for this paper’s corpus generation. In short, it allows for a focus on promotional copy. As the focus is on promotional copy, using archives with OCR rather than metadata searches, better removes archival bias; pulling out phrases for analysis in context. A clear counterpoint, however, is that it may exclude similar phrases, synonyms and hypernyms that speak to the same effect. This method offers several challenges linguistically and methodologically. The identification of the initial search terms come from somewhere in advance of using the archive, and there is a risk of searching for search terms that then leads to artificial emphasis on those terms. Looking for linguistic instances and finding them risks falling victim to a fallacy of prevalent proof, and accusations of ‘cherry-picking’ data. Using the term ‘cinematic’ as a starting point for exploring games promotion offers a useful basis for corpus generation, enabling clear integration with existing work in the field. By no means a fool-proof method of mapping all the possible instances of antecedent convergence, it speaks to Mc Glynn’s (2023) notion of the ‘aspiration’ of the industry while offering the flexibility to interpret the degree to which ‘cinema’ is being evoked.

Corpus and analysis

Searching the EIMA for the term ‘cinematic’ between 1/1/1990 and 31/12/1999, limiting the results to those publications catalogued within the ‘Computers-Computer Games’ Publication Subject, generates 821 results illustrated within Table 1. Prima facie, this suggests a clear increase in usage as the 1990s progressed. Table 1, however, includes all possible content as organised by the EIMA system: Advert, Article, Back matter, Correspondence, Editorial cartoon/comic, Feature and Fiction and refinement is needed for a focus on promotion.

Table 1.

EIMA ‘cinematic’ results.

Year	Count
1990	2
1991	1
1992	4
1993	46
1994	115
1995	92
1996	116
1997	139
1998	141
1999	165
Total	821

It is possible that specific games being released with these terms generate subsequent discussions using these terms. We can extrapolate from Kirkpatrick (2015) that there might be reader debates around ‘cinematic’ claims used in promotion, and without in-depth analysis of each instance, all we can say is that the frequency increases. Quantitative datasets alone omit context but indicate use of the term in magazines themselves, indicating a discourse. The overall frequency increase can be explained at least partly by archival gaps. Only one of the magazines included has a complete archive within the timeframe, with many magazines within this starting in the mid-1990s, where Kirkpatrick’s study ends. Interestingly, the mid-1990s coincides with the promotional content that initiated this study and opened this paper.

Turning to wider press archives, by way of triangulation and overcoming such gaps, the Nexis newspaper archived suggests a similar latency in terminology – with no references to ‘cinematic’ within three words of ‘game’ before 1992 (Table 2). The Nexis archive, however, is not a dedicated games archive, and the composition is clearly articulated with possible gaps like the EIMA. At the same time, this search highlights ‘game’ rather than a specific title, pointing to a need to sample promotional campaigns for games to address this. It shows a steady but more muted use of the term in a wider context. With 132 references from all sources, 24 of the references come from Business Wire, with 14 from PR Newswire, suggesting press releases or other industry-originating content using these terms in the greatest concentration. That these are the sources with the highest frequencies, it follows that ‘churnalism’ is possible (Davies, 2008). Broadly understood as the reframing of press release terminology to amplify the newsworthy angles indicated, resulting in the emphasis, adoption and circulation of specific terms (Maat and de Jong, 2013). A less cynical approach is perhaps that these press releases offer a cultural moment of contemplation in what the games industry might be, the emergence of a new frame or the stabilisation of an existing one. This alone offers another trajectory for further study that might seek to clarify the ratio of PR to newspaper content using such claims and a specific tracking of journalistic adoption rates for terminology.

Table 2.

‘Cinematic’ results (Nexis).

Year	Count
1990	--
1991	--
1992	3
1993	9
1994	16
1995	24
1996	16
1997	24
1998	19
1999	21
TOTAL	132

Refining the EIMA corpus gives us a stronger sense of ‘cinematic’ as used in promotion. This decision represents the first of many possible future studies, exploring other aspects of this dataset. Indeed, it introduces potential bias in the coding of content as ‘advertising’ (and thus possibly excluding advertorials, branded content, etc.). This approach, however, allows for a clearer focus on the promotional framing as an antecedent agent of convergence and excludes the sites in which this might otherwise occur. Unlike the Nexis archive, which includes press releases, the EIMA categorises advertising specifically. Allowing for the possibility in future studies, of collating press releases from Nexis, with adverts themselves. Within the EIMA alone, however, discrepancies start to emerge, indicated in brackets within Table 3. The EIMA search returns 83 instances of ‘cinematic’. A closer review shows that a small number of these instances require specific consideration. One (1996) being the title of a company: ‘cinematic multimedia’, a trademark of Interplay Games. This reference appears within advertising small print as a trademark rather than promotional copy for a specific product. The remaining eight are adverts for jobs in the industry and represent a corpus subset that requires further discussion.

Table 3.

EIMA ‘cinematic’ in adverts.

1990	0
1991	0
1992	0
1993	7 (1)
1994	18
1995	16 (3)
1996	17 (1)
1997	9 (3)
1998	5
1999	11(1)
Total	83

Job adverts

As an important indication of the kinds of roles available within the games labour market these results warrant further attention, representing another possible future study. If, as King and Krzywinska (2002) suggest, converged corporate ownership is linked with industrial organisation, advertising for jobs (and any descriptors therein) offers insight into the way the industry sees itself and the projects being recruited for, in advance of those projects manifesting as games. As Harvey notes of contemporary recruitment: ‘recruitment materials […] are informed by features of games’ (2023: 185). While Harvey’s observation is based on an analysis of Higher Education recruitment materials, this point remains relevant when inverted. Looking at who is being recruited, and with what terminology, offers an insight into areas that the industry considers worthy of investment and future development. Regardless of those roles’ visibility through industrial output, we can see who was sought and what skills were highlighted. Reviewing the 8 job adverts, 3 of which are repeated verbatim, all from Edge magazine, we see the usage of the term ‘cinematic’ in relation to the role (Table 4).

Table 4.

‘Cinematic’ job adverts (EIMA).

Date	Company	Term in context
1/11/99	Pure Entertainment	Expected to produce animations to cinematic standards
1/7/97	Ardvark Swift	Alias modeller/animator: Cinematic atmospheric game, classical art background preferred
1/6/97
1/6/97
1/12/96	Ardvark Swift	2d artist (cinematic game)
1/11/95	BITS	Accomplished animators and 3D artists with the talent to build spectacular virtual environments, amazing animated characters, dramatic lighting, imaginative texture-mapping, and state of the art cinematic sequences
1/6/95	Interplay	Interplay are pushing back the boundaries of game development using techniques such as clay and cell animation, blue screen photography and cinematic camera angles
1/3/95	Virgin Interactive Entertainment	We need animators with traditional cell animation skills, 3D Character animation skills and cinematic animation; we need designers and finally we need producers at all levels

Within these instances we see this term is largely used as an indicator of the kind of animation required or anticipated within the company, though the 1996/97/99 instances denote the kinds of project, akin to a genre indicator. That animators were sought with skills that rival ‘cinematic standards’ suggests an industrial comparison, whether from shared technological skills, or from the same labour pool is unclear. That specific standards are sought in this instance suggests the industry is asking for a level of comparative quality and thus sees either the output or the skillset needed as being interlinked with the cinema industry. It is worth noting that the BITS advert calls for ‘state of the art cinematic sequences’, suggesting a similar level of quality-association with the term. These are not just cinematic sequences described at a technical level and in-keeping with a technical term’s use, but rather sequences that are ‘state of the art’. It is unclear how such ‘cinematic standards’ are enforced or evaluated in practice, nor what they are precisely, but seeking this otherwise unknown value in recruitment points to a level of shared knowledge between recruiters and applicant, indicative of industry norms. This, in turn, might give weight to the suggestion that as the decade progresses there’s an acceptance of what ‘cinematic’ means in the context of the games industry, but this claim requires caution and further triangulation.

The adverts prior to 1996, point to ‘cinematic animation’ or ‘cinematic sequences’ as being a component of the job rather than any explicit form of value attribute, suggesting this is a technical term or term to describe key industry skills or outputs. This theme appears elsewhere in the corpus. It is possible that such cinematic animations now operate under ‘cut scenes’ but without industry interviews and analysis of production notes it is difficult to support this claim beyond supposition. What these job adverts show is the use of specific terminology to both describe projects artistically, and to identify skills needed. Within the former, ‘cinematic’ is used to indicate the company or project’s artistic vision. Interplay uses the term alongside claims of ‘pushing back the boundaries’, though blue screen photography and clay/cell animation, technologies that are perhaps more immediately thought of as being skills from the film industry. The rhetorical claim here is that through their use, the company is inherently at the forefront of development in games. Importantly though this company is connected with the other outlier in the corpus. The small print of an Interplay advert (1996, Table 3) notes that ‘cinematic multimedia is a trademark of Interplay Productions Ltd’. This would suggest the brand identity is linked with notions of ‘the cinematic’. How such a connection compares with others in the industry at this time is difficult to say for certain. That the term is trademarked suggests a sense of regulatory control and proprietary ownership similar to the film industry (Staiger, 1984). Rationale for trademarking is complex (Castaldi, 2018), but can be seen as one indicator of industrial innovation (Mendonça et al., 2004). As will be shown later Interplay was promoting game-film adaptations at this time, and content creation would have occurred prior to the start of the timeframe of study.

‘Cinematic’ within the job adverts here falls into two key uses, on the one hand, we see a clear use of ‘cinematic’ as a technical term describing a functional element of the game, while we also see it being used in terms of an anticipated or ascribed quality. This suggests a duality in the kinds of rhetoric that might be at work elsewhere, a kind of context-dependent double articulation. One that speaks to the conditions of games’ creation; as a technical term that describes an element akin to a cut scene. And one that shapes the expectations of the kinds of experience available. This intertwined linguistic usage offers the possibility of a negotiated meaning shifting with an industry’s negotiated identity as it develops, and offers a potential frame for analysis of the remaining games advertisements.

The interconnected meanings of ‘cinematic’

Reviewing the remaining adverts (Table 5, in appendix, with numeric identifiers) we can see this pattern of double meaning at work. This is not wholly unusual though; linguistic meaning is rarely stable. Sites of communication catalyse shifts in meaning (see Crystal, 2001). The corpus of game adverts consists of clear references to cinematic ‘scenes’, ‘animations’ or ‘sequences’ as technical features of game play. Here, as with the job adverts, technical constituent elements of the game are labelled as ‘cinematic’, elsewhere the term indicates an aspirational quality. Such instances are not mutually exclusive, however, with several overlapping. In part this is due to the nature of the videogame itself. As a medium that treats images and visualisation as inherent to the game experience, digital visualisations are inseparable from the technology that create the game, interconnected with the technical assemblage that enables gameplay. How the game looks then, becomes a mark of technological excellence as well as an example of the storytelling potential (as with cinema). Bound up within the latter, however, is the suggestion of perhaps a more intimate or cathartic experience. The distribution shows no clear historic pattern, but as expected the repetition of advertising frequency skews the distribution into clusters around campaigns using identical output. Interplay, in its job adverts (Table 4), presents itself as a company at the cutting edge of visualisation, but this is not entirely manifest within the game adverts. As within Table 3, Interplay uses ‘cinematic’ as part of a trademarked term and so is excluded from Table 5’s list of game adverts. Yet, given the discussion of labour and recruitment, it justifies a brief digression into the advert. Edge (December 1, 1993, 82-3) sees a double page spread promoting Interplay games Battle Chess (1988), J, R.R Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings (1990) and Star Trek (1992) ‘a heart-pounding mission […] all faithfully authentic to the Star Trek TV series’. All games have a brief 2-3 sentence blurb promoting the core premise of the game, with subsequent bullet points that espouse the technical and experiential selling points. Battle Chess notes you will ‘[w]itness brutal executions in breathtaking animation’ but offers only technical discussions (‘10 levels of play’, ‘30 minute spoken tutorials’) absent by comparison is the overt emphasis on visualisation shown in the rest of the spread. While Lord of the Rings claims ‘the largest full motion window ever in a PC game allows you experience epic scenes from Ralph Bakshi’s animated adventure movie’. However, Star Trek’s boasts ‘hear Captain Kirk, Mr Spock [...et al.…] speak directly to you’, ‘Authentic musical score and sound effects from the TV series’, ‘256 colour VGA graphics’ (a form of colour mode that saw 8 bits per pixel, resulting in increased colour gradient availability). Alongside being narrative driven, the latter two games have a clearer emphasis on the technical offering while engaging with intellectual property (IP) from another industry. The implications are that these games are just as visually impressive and engaging as the source material. The three games, released in 1988, 1990, and 1992 show an increased emphasis on visualisation (from references to the kind of animation, to a direct association with rewatching movie scenes, to a clear claim of replicating the TV series, coupled with the specific graphics used). This shows how games technology might borrow the context of the film industry. We must again treat such claims with caution. Two of these games are based on existing creative IP and are what we might call supersemiotic adaptations, incorporating the ludic element of gameplay with the content. With this in mind, we might expect to see an emphasis on the new possibilities of the medium. That Interplay’s Lord of the Rings was released in 1990 points to Interplay being a proponent (within the context of the 1990s dataset at least) of cinematic convergence. Whether this is replicated elsewhere in the industry at this time, or if Interplay is an industry leader, is unclear based on the corpus alone. In the case of Interplay at least, there is a clear interest and identity in equating their games as equals or extensions of known stories. Thus, they co-opt known experiences for the promotional purposes of selling games. While emerging from Interplay (with its cinematic trademark), it is interesting that neither of these games are promoted with the term ‘cinematic’ specifically. Rather, the copy positions these games as worthy of engagement through the extrapolation of constituent technical elements that in turn, facilitate engagement with a previous experience from another medium. That this advert is an anomaly in the corpus, but offers a rich contribution, points to the limitations of the methodology imposed by a focus on ‘cinematic’ and the need for further study into the wider context.

Table 5.

‘Cinematic’ in games promotion (EIMA).

Ref no.	Game title	Platform	Publication	Date	Frequency count	Phrase context
1	Cat Woman	Gameboy	Nintendo Power	1/12/99	1	Dramatic cinematic scenes between stages keep the action going at a heart pounding tempo
2	HOMEWORLD	----	PC Gamer	1/10/99	1	‘…homeworld simultaneously delivers cinematic-quality graphics, stunning special effects…’
3	Beyond the Frontier	CD ROM	PC Gamer	1/10/99	2	Proprietary 3D engine delivers a breathtaking cinematic experience
			PC Zone	1/10/99
4	SINI STAR UNLEASHED	CD ROM	PC Gamer	1/10/99	2	Cinematic real-time lighting and special effects
			PC Zone	1/10/99
5	Alpha Sextauri	-----	PC Accelerator	1/7/99	1	They are a cinematic smorgasbord of erotic fantasy
6	NINTENDO POWER PLAYER'S PULSE	--- Advert for reader-submitted content	Nintendo power	1/4/99	1	Lots of readers have commented on the epic cinematic prospects of Zelda
7	PC-DVD encore	-----	PC Accelerator	1/2/99	2	A heart-pounding cinematic experience is no longer restricted to the big screen’
				1/1/99
8	COLONY WARS	PlayStation	Computer & Video Games, suppl. Freeplay	1/12/98	2	Epic cinematic sequences, dozens of missions, and a dark, twisting plot
			Edge	1/12/98
9	Grand Theft Auto	PlayStation	PC Gamer	1/3/98	2	It was indeed a great honour for Grand Theft Auto to have followed in the footsteps of such cinematic greats as ‘reservoir dogs’, ‘death race 2000’ and ‘crash’
			GamesMaster	1/3/98
10	Nightmare Creatures	PlayStation	Play	1/1/98	1	This gruesome game is one of the first to combine Gothic cinematic horror with the action of a classic beat ‘em up
11	Constructor	CD ROM	PC Gamer	1/10/97	3	Not much call for computers round here. Unique cinematic interface? More than my job’s worth matey
			PC Zone	1/10/97
			PC Zone	1/9/97
12	Command and Conquer	PlayStation	Ultra Game Players	1/4/97	1	Cinematic movie scenes put the player in touch with the action
13	Dragon Lore II	CD ROM	PC Gamer	1/1/97	2	The splendour of cinematic 3D graphics
			Edge	1/1/97
14	Warcraft II	PC	PC Gamer	1/8/96	1	Stunning new 3D cinematic sequences
15	World Heroes 2 Jet	----	Game Players	1/7/96	1	These include beautiful cinematic intermission and new background graphics
16	Warcraft II: Beyond the Dark Portal	----	Edge	1/7/96	2	Discover new territory in 50 custom maps and review your battle situation in stunning 3D cinematic sequences
			PC Gamer	1/5/96
17	Warcraft II Tides of Darkness	CD ROM	PC Gamer	1/6/96	1	Stunning new 3D cinematic sequences
18	Jetfighter III	----	PC Zone	1/5/96	3	First person cinematic interface
			PC Zone	1/4/96
			PC Gamer	1/3/96
19	Cyberia	----	Game Players	1/3/96	3	This is the most incredible gaming experience ever. Dolby sound, music and full-screen cinematic motion so realistic you’ll lose yourself in the year 2027.
			Game Players	1/2/96
			Game Players	1/1/96
20	SPUD	CD ROM	PC Zone	1/2/96	3	A multitude of beautifully crafted cinematic cartoon animations
			PC Gamer	1/2/96
			PC Gamer	1/1/96
21	Primal Rage	PlayStation	Game players	1/2/96	1	New cinematic intros
22	The Riddle of Master Lu	----	PC Zone	1/1/96	1	Use of unique cinematic techniques depicting character emotions give this graphic adventure its own distinct visual style
23a	The Daedalus Encounter	----	Edge	1/12/95	2	An original movie score and realistic sound effects enhance the cinematic experience
23b			PC Gamer	1/5/95		Sumptuous cinematic sequences are infused with exploration, puzzle solving, combat and occasionally diplomacy.
24	Star Trek the Next Generation: a Final Unity	CD ROM	PC Gamer	1/7/95	2	No other space adventure comes close to the reality of this CD Rom excursion which is brought to life by characters who speak to you, rich cinematic sequences incredible SVGA graphics and CD-quality sound and music
			PC Gamer	1/6/95
25	Full Throttle	CD ROM	Edge	1/7/95	1	This head on collision of action and adventure combines stunning scenery with cinematic feel to create a living, breathing adventure of epic proportions
26	Wing Commander III: Heart of the Tiger	----	3DO	1/6/95	3	An orchestral score, explosive sound effects and digitised character speech complete the cinematic atmosphere
			PC Gamer	1/6/95
			Edge	1/6/95
27	Flashback	CD ROM	GamesMaster	1/5/95	2	Fascinating cinematic sequences and spine tingling music make flashback the ultimate in futuristic action adventure
			3DO	1/4/95
28	Stonekeep	CD ROM	Edge	1/3/95	3	Hollywood special effects, stunning live action cinematic sequences, 3-D rendered dungeons, a phenomenal experience
			Edge	1/2/95
			Edge	1/1/95
29	Lawnmower Man	CD ROM	Game Players Sega Nintendo	1/1/95	2	Guide Dr Angelo through original puzzles, “Cinematic” style platforms, and fly-through sequences that capture the look, feel, and quality of the blockbuster film
			Game Players Sega Nintendo	1/12/94
30	Walls of Bratock	----	PC Gamer	1/12/94	6	Awesome sound blaster music + two great cinematic cut-scenes
			PC Gamer	1/11/94
			PC Gamer	1/9/94
			PC Gamer	1/8/94
			PC Gamer	1/7/94
			PC Gamer	1/6/94
31	Blackthorne	CD ROM	Game Players Sega Nintendo	1/12/94	2	All blasting at you in full-motion cinematic animation and digitised sound – so real that you’ll think you lived it
				1/10/94
32	Star Crusader	CD ROM	PC Gamer	1/11/94	2	Riveting hyper realistic 3D graphics, with fully texture mapped ships, on the fly translucency. Gourand and Phong shading, and cinematic multimedia videos
			PC Gamer	1/10/94
33	Super Wing Commander	----	EDGE	1/11/94	2	Awesome cinematic sequences, superb 3D graphics plus full character speech […]
				1/10/94
34	Overlord	----	PC Gamer	1/8/94	1	The game features the revolutionary INSIDE COMBAT LOCK system, the cinematic VIEW MATRIX and most realistic graphical portrayal
35	Star Wars Rebel Assault	----	Game Players Sega Nintendo	1/8/94	2	In a far away galaxy filled with digitized cinematic sequences and SFX from the original star Wars trilogy […]
35	Star Wars Rebel Assault	----	Game Players Sega Nintendo	1/5/94	2
36	Iron Helix	----	PC Gamer	1/1/94	1	Cinematic 3-d graphics featuring live actors with fully digitised voices
37a	Microcosm	----	Game Players Sega Nintendo	1/1/94	3	Unparalleled cinematic style imagery […]
37b	Shadow of the Beast II			1/12/93		Well orchestrated music tracks, eight-way scrolling and cinematic animated sequences transport you to […]
37b	[NB both in same advert for Psygnosis games]			1/11/93
38	Ultima VI	----	PC Zone	1/11/93	1	Experience cinematic storytelling at its best, […]
39	Veil of Darkness	----	PC Zone	1/5/93	2	Live the horror with heart stopping graphics and animation, stunning cinematic sequences, haunting music and blood-curdling sound effects
39	Veil of Darkness	----	PC Zone	1/4/93	2
40	Stunt Island	----	PC Zone	1/5/93	1	15 ready-edited films allow you to familiarise yourself with cinematic techniques

Attention can now turn to the bulk of the corpus that uses ‘cinematic’ within the promotional copy itself (Table 5). Following Mc Glynn (2023), the promise of ‘the cinema’ is one of the key lenses through which we can understand ‘cinematic’. Here the term is used in association with cathartic attributes, typically evoking the kind of experience on offer. Alongside ‘cinematic’ we see positive qualifiers, ‘[H]eart-pounding’ (1), ‘breathtaking’ (3), a ‘smorgasbord of erotic fantasy’ (5) and ‘sumptuous’ (23b). All emphasise elements of the game’s storytelling and experiential prowess. This framing of consumption suggests a forthcoming experience in a similar manner to cinema promotion. Consider the claims made historically within film promotion, as Kernan notes of early horror trailers ‘in which audiences were reminded of the power of horror films to assault them physically’ (2004: 22). The cathartic, experiential element transcends mere storytelling in a way that affects the audience. This style of promotional rhetoric is clearly found in historic and contemporary film promotion across all genres, though is most overt in horror. At the heart of this is that the story is to be consumed, and that consumption is largely talked about in terms of audience affect, in lieu of taste and flavour that we might see with other consumables. Here we can consider the work of Gregg and Seigworth ‘[a]ffect is in many ways synonymous with force or forces of encounter’ (2010: 2). Within the corpus there is a clear sense that the product on offer may leave a marked impression upon the user, and thus justify their time and financial investment. There is also the parallel logic here that having invested in a games system, games need to consistently justify the investment (and vice versa). Aspirational usage may also directly reference the cinema industry, ‘Unparalleled cinematic style imagery’ (37a). Here suggesting the technical prowess of the game’s content without treating the term as a technical characteristic of the game itself, these are not ‘cinematic images’ denoting a direct replication but an equation of a known experience in a different medium.

In this context an anticipated, as yet unseen aesthetic is being borrowed and re-created outside the medium of film. As Bolter and Grusin note, ‘whenever one medium seems to have convinced viewers of its immediacy, other media try to appropriate that conviction’ (1999: 9). Or rather, the copy here erases the notion of the product being just a game, by promising that it is so much more than a game. This reduces its own medium’s visibility and offers a frame by which quality can be assessed. The aspirational element of ‘cinematic style’ references the film industry as a separate entity, simultaneously speaking to the technical possibilities of the game. This points to the games industry negotiating its own identity through technological development: trying to maintain superiority to other products in the same industry, while acknowledging another industry’s existence and erasing its own frame of reference. Yet, it is unclear if this emerges either as a response internally to competition within the games industry (as a form of product differentiation), or externally due to the industry’s desire to compete in a wider entertainment market (i.e. against the film industry). ‘[E]xperience cinematic storytelling’ (38) appears in a full-page advert for a range of ‘PC HIT’ games which appear to be linked together as all originating from Origin Studios. Specifically, this claim is made for Ultima VI; the false prophet (1990) (38), underneath a central advert for Wing Commander (1990) on the same page. The 1990 Wing Commander advert makes no mention of cinema or film but does promote the visualisations ‘the graphics are superb’, ‘you ain’t seen nothing better’. This suggests an emphasis on the visual-technical but subsequent adverts within the corpus (33; 1994, 26; 1995) do reference the film industry. From ‘cinematic sequences’ in 1994 to ‘[a]n orchestral Score, […] complete the cinematic atmosphere’ in 1995 (26). That the 1996 campaign for Wing Commander IV, not included within this corpus but noted at the start of this paper, would boast a cinema-style promotion suggests a progression towards soliciting the cinematic as a mode of engagement. It further suggests that initially ‘cinematic sequences’ were used as a technical term before shifting towards this aspirational context. Indeed, a brief overview of ‘cinematic sequences’ in the EIMA suggests a reduction in the term’s frequency as the corpus progresses chronologically (Table 6).

Table 6.

Frequence of ‘cinematic sequence’ (EIMA).

Year	Frequency
1998	1
1997	0
1996	3
1995	4
1994	2
1993	2
1992	0
1991	0
1990	0

Certainly, other terms do not appear as frequently; ‘cinematic animated sequences’ (37b) ‘sequences’ (29) and ‘cut scenes’ (30) appear each only once chronologically early in the corpus suggesting a shift in technical terms at some point. Within the corpus, the term ‘cinematic’ is used in a manner we might now consider a cut scene, those sequences of footage so often cited as being indicative of cinematic convergence with the games industry, short [film] sequences often embedded within the wider narrative of a game. While histories of the cutscene exist (Klevjer, 2014) they never focus on the linguistic element, citing only the aesthetic emergence rather than the point at which the term became ubiquitous within the industry. In the EIMA corpus only one explicit reference to ‘cut-scenes’ (30) is found alongside ‘cinematic’. With most others using the term cinematic ‘scenes’ (1), cinematic ‘sequences’ (8) cinematic ‘movie scenes’ (12), or cinematic ‘intermission’ (15). Each of these phrases warrants closer inspection for subtle nuances and frequency across a differently formulated corpus. But it is tempting to see these terms as interchangeable, perhaps as indicative of a period of pre-standardisation of videogame terminology or indeterminacy to once again use Kirkpatrick’s term (2015). Another area of future study is the application of terminology by industry personnel. By way of brief exploration into this, a triangulatory Nexis search for ‘cut-scene’ (and linguistic deviations such as ‘cutscene’, and ‘cut scene’) points to only 82 mentions of the term prior to 31/12/1999, with the first games-relevant reference in 1996 (McKenzie, 1996) and the second in 1997 (Hellaby, 1997). Again, a further study here is warranted, exploring the use of ‘cinematic sequence’ in relation to ‘cut scene’. A search on Nexis for ‘cinematic sequence’ within 5 words of ‘game’ offers a year-on-year increase, dropping suddenly in 2020, and rising again in 2022. This would suggest that the two terms co-exist. The results are in the hundreds of thousands throughout the 1990s, increasing to the millions each year in the 2000s. Any possible narrative of ‘cut-scene’ replacing ‘cinematic sequence’ is therefore significantly challenged based on this cursory data.

What emerges within the corpus is the interplay of technology with games, as we might expect of the assemblage outlined by T.L Taylor (2009). In these instances, the cinematic sequences are posited as breaking down the barriers between audience and object, a form of early immersion rhetoric by another name: cinematic. This brings us back to the notion of ‘cinematic’ and affect. As the advert for Cyberia (19) notes ‘this is the most incredible gaming experience ever. Dolby sound, music and full-screen cinematic motion so realistic you’ll lose yourself in the year 2027.’ Here the emphasis on technical prowess, a development in image rendering is touted alongside Dolby sound – long associated with cinema. These kinds of claims though appear throughout the corpus. ‘Cinematic movie scenes put the player in touch with the action’ (12), ‘This head on collision of action and adventure combines stunning scenery with cinematic feel to create a living, breathing adventure of epic proportions’ (25). Such claims complicate the simplistic binary of either a technical or aspirational dichotomy at work. Collectively, they demonstrate the overlapping ways in which the technology of the game manifests the visualisation, and that such visualisation is seen in comparison to other technologies.

Within the corpus though, there are further notable anomalies: for example, the promotion for Grand Theft Auto (1997) (9). An advert for the game makes a virtue of the fact that it was rated as 18 by the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC), actively citing examples of films that received the same treatment and were also in some way controversial in terms of their content: ‘It was indeed a great honour for Grand Theft Auto to have followed in the footsteps of such cinematic greats as “Reservoir Dogs,” “Death Race 2000” and “Crash.”’ The advert positions this rating as a badge of honour, and a reason for the company to feel ‘proud’: ‘Grand Theft Auto is so good, it won a certificate before it was even released’ (9). This kind of interplay is interesting simply for being the anomaly within the corpus. At a time when other promotion has ambiguity around the kinds of appropriation at work, this is overt and specifically cultural, there is no mention of graphics or technical prowess, only ratings (both press and regulatory). However, such a discourse is not an anomaly in terms of Rockstar’s long-term position and branding of GTA’s promotional identity (for an overview, see Wright, 2022: 13-15).

Viewing the corpus in this light, all but a few are using the term ‘cinematic’ in a purely technical sense, with clear connections to the kind of technical specification. This trend also appears to have been used in a pejorative sense. Constructor (1997) (11), mocks the use of cinematic as a technical term for promotion: ‘Not much call for computers round here. Unique Cinematic interface? More than my job’s worth matey.’ It has ‘Mortar Combat’ in large block letters. This subversive use of ‘cinematic’ draws attention to the widespread use of the term suggesting a wider cultural awareness of it. The reference to Mortal Kombat is ambiguous, on the one hand it might be simply to denote the competitive nature of the game, or it might be a further commentary on the use of cinema to promote it. Without further analysis any conclusion on this point must be cautious.

Concluding notes

Within this corpus, it is perhaps the anomalous results that throw into relief the mundane. We see that ‘cinematic’ has a double meaning, but also that there is evidence of it becoming a (potentially negative) trope at this time. That a promotional copy alludes to this, suggests (1) that such a ‘cinematic’ trope was prevalent and widely understood; and (2) that there was a market justification for pushing against it. This would suggest a stability in the discourse of the term that is not played out in the analysis above. The corpus does not show a completely linear path, towards or away from the cinema, but rather a complex negotiation of technology, skill and terminology. We know such remediational negotiation happens, and much of this work can be discussed through Bolter and Grusin’s framework for remediation (1999). A key point here is that this double articulation complicates the idea that one medium might subsume another, linguistically we do not see ‘cinematic’ becoming the stand-in for games, rather we see it occupying specific places, specific types of games and skills. We see subtle nuances in the ways in which language is used to evoke, present and ultimately define the medium and its workers. Such positioning works ahead of the consumption of individual games or the start of individual projects and we can see a clear discourse that enables users to make value judgements based on prior experiences of the technology. This study noted King and Krzywinska's observation that interactions ‘were far from arbitrary’ (2002: 7). Here we support this claim, with no evidence of arbitrary use of ‘cinema’ but rather a complex interplay through which the games industry promotes its wares to the public. The corpus generated offers specific (in some cases weekly) touchstone moments between film and the games industry. If such a project could be expanded to other terms and other datasets it offers the possibility of conducting a focused history of remediationary practices and framing.

The degree to which overarching conclusions can be drawn is limited. We may never know the context in which the promotional copy for these adverts was written and approved, but we can start to chart the application of key terms as they appear. In drawing attention to where and when promotional copy started using ‘cinematic’, we can see the moment at which stakeholders decided to use that term, at that time, and thus partially in what context. In many ways the mode of analysis, with its focus on language has curtailed the kinds of conclusions that can be drawn. A focus on the linguistic is excellent for generating quantitative data, but lacking here are the qualitative and interpretive elements needed to clearly contextualise within this. To what extent is this frame of reference found in other sites of discourse? How might gamers have responded to this term? What was understood at the time by the term ‘cinematic’? These questions all lie at the heart of this historical discussion.

This paper has suggested a number of potential studies to further this one. Exploring the market roles available in the games market during this period would offer another dataset for both the skills and the framing of those skills. Of particular note would be entry-level jobs that might appeal to skillsets rather than those with established careers. With a focus on specific terminology further context is needed. It would be interesting to clarify the ratio of terminology used in press releases to newspaper content. Such an analysis might offer insight into broader market dynamics, and help to situate promotional copy within promotional campaigns more broadly while offering scope for seeing how popular some terminology becomes over others. This in turn, might provide additional context for the emergence of specific terms in the popular press. At the same time, inversely focusing on industry terminology (as opposed to promotional terminology) might also provide a clearer narrative for the ways in which certain outputs and skills were conceptualised and discussed. The study has pointed to the primacy of ‘cinematic sequence’ in relation to ‘cut scene’ and this represents one such example of how specific behind the scenes industry terminology might permeate the promotional copy, and thus enter public usage. Alternatively, this paper has highlighted how some companies, notably Interplay, sought to actively incorporate the notion of the cinematic; the extent to which other companies positioned themselves (rather than their wares) may offers a clearer look at the formation of the games industry.

These potential interrelated studies offer nascent sites for development. In understanding the promotional copy, at least in this instance, we have started to unpack the very nuances of remediation, of discourse as it leaves a (linguistic) trace across the industry. The data set here, 1990–1999, offers a snapshot of UK and US uses of the term ‘cinematic’ in promotional contexts. It shows that the term is overwhelmingly used in connection with the technology of the games industry, but further work is needed on the ways in which cinematic-sequence versus cut scene, or other terminology might play out.

As a mode of understanding the widespread discourse of games advertising in the 1990s the dataset has offered little beyond a series of possible further studies. But it does point towards moments outside the dataset and in doing so challenges the view implied that games promotion might have had a light-bulb moment in the late 1990s and pivoted to a new form of promotion. While work elsewhere has pointed to specific moments at which forms of cinema-style promotion emerged, this paper has offered a more muted suggestion that while a handful of campaigns did actively solicit the ‘cinematic’ to promote their wares overtly, many more simply did so as standard, suggesting not a whole shift in promotional convergence in the 1990s, but rather a few campaigns seizing a cultural zeitgeist and playing up to existing tropes within the games industry.

Footnotes

ORCID iD

Ed Vollans

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Beil

Freyermuth

Schmidt

(eds) (2021) Paratextualizing Games. Investigations on the Paraphernalia and Peripheries of Play. Bielefeld: Transcript.

Bolter

Grusin

(1999) Remediation; Understanding New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Burgess

MCR

Dill-Shackleford

Stermer

Burgess

Brown

(2011) Playing with prejudice: the prevalence and consequences of racial stereotypes in video games. Media Psychology 14(3): 289–311.

Cassidy

(2011) The Videogame as Narrative. Quarterly Review of Film and Video 28(4): 292–306.

Castaldi

(2018) To trademark or not to trademark: The case of the creative and cultural industries. Research Policy 47(3): 606–616.

Church

(2022) Mortal Kombat: Games of Death. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Condis

Morrissette

(2023) Dudes, boobs, and GameCubes: video game advertising. Media Culture & Society 45(6) 1285-1303

Consumer Electronics . [No Author] (1995) NOTEBOOKS December 4. Pg 14. Warren Publishing Inc.

Crystal

(2001) Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Davies

(2008) Flat Earth News. London: Chatto & Windus.

11.

Economist (2023) Moviemaking and gamemaking are converging’ the Economist special report: mouse, keyboard, action march 20th. https://www.economist.com/specialreport/2023/03/20/moviemaking-and-gamemaking-are-converging.

12.

Graser

(2000) Triumph of the tech toys: DVD, vidgames and other gadgets open outlets for H’wood product. Variety 377: 24–30.

13.

Gregg

Seigworth

(eds) (2010) The Affect Theory Reader. Durham & London: Duke University Press.

14.

Hall

(1980) Introduction to Media Studies at the Centre. In: Hall

Hobson

Lowe

Willis

(eds). Culture, Media, Language. London: Routledge, 117–121.

15.

Harvey

(2023) Making sense of Gameswork: university marketing materials as games paratexts in Seiwald and Vollans (eds). (Not) in the Game: History, Paratexts and Games. De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 177–194.

16.

Hay

Couldry

(2011) Rethinking convergence/culture: an introduction. Cultural Studies 25(4–5): 473–486.

17.

Hellaby

(1997) Games Without Frontiers. The Daily Telegraph (Australia). March 24, 1997, 74–74.

18.

Jebens

(1996) Powerhouse hardware software; Exploring all things high-tech in the world of entertainment. Austin American-Statesman(Texas), XL Ent; 23. February 29.

19.

Kaltman

(2020) Attending to process and data A research alignment for historical videogame production artifacts and their archives. ROM chip 2(2). Available at: https://romchip.org/index.php/romchip-journal/article/view/117.

20.

Kernan

(2004) Coming Attractions. Austin: University Texas Press.

21.

King

Krzywinska

(2002) Screenplay: Cinema/Videogame/Interfaces. London: Wallflower Press.

22.

Kirkpatrick

(2015) The Formation of Gaming Culture: UK Gaming Magazines 1981-1995. London: Palgrave.

23.

Klevjer

(2014) Cut-scenes. In: Wolf

MJP

Perron

(eds). The Routledge Companion to Video Game Studies. London: Routledge, 301–309.

24.

Maat

de Jong

(2013) How newspaper journalists reframe product press release information. Journalism 14(3): 348–371.

25.

Manovich

(2002) The Language of New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.

26.

Mc Glynn

(2023) The “Cinematic Promise” of video game music: stylistic convergence, current-generation remakes, and the case of final fantasy VII. Journal of Sound and Music in Games 4(4): 108–138.

27.

McKenzie

(1996) Keep cool and blast 'em. Calgary Herald, Sunday, Final Edition 13 October 1996.

28.

McKernan

(2013) The Morality of play: video game coverage in the New York Times from 1980 to 2010. Games and Culture 8(5): 307–329.

29.

McLuhan

(1964) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. London & New York: McGraw-Hill.

30.

Mendonça

Pereira

Godinho

(2004) Trademarks as an indicator of innovation and industrial change. Research Policy 33(9): 1385–1404.

31.

Newman

Simons

(2018) Game Over? Curating, Preserving and Exhibiting Games, A White Paper. British Academy/Leverhulme Trust. https://thebgi.uk/gameoverwhitepaper/

32.

Scharrer

(2004) Virtual violence: gender and aggression in video game advertisements. Mass Communication & Society 7(4): 393–412.

33.

Seiwald

Vollans

(eds) (2023) (Not) in the Game: History, Paratexts, and Games. De Gruyter Oldenbourg.

34.

Shaw

Gurman

(2021) Netflix plans to offer videogames in push beyond films, TV. Bloomberg. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-14/netflix-plans-to-offer-video-games-in-expansion-beyond-films-tv.

35.

Silverman

(1994) Sega channels TV vidgames. Television, Variety. July 18-24.

36.

Staiger

(1984) Combination and litigation: structures of U.S. film distribution, 1896-1917. Cinema Journal 23(2): 41.

37.

Švelch

(2015) Towards a typology of video game trailers: between the ludic and the cinematic. GAME 4: 17–21.

38.

Taylor

(2009) The Assemblage of Play. Games and Culture 4(4): 331–339.

39.

Therrien

Lefebvre

(2017) Now you’re playing with adverts: a repertoire of frames for the historical study of game culture through marketing discourse. Kinephanos: Journal of Media Studies and Popular Culture 7(1): 37–73.

40.

Thurlow

Mroczek

(2011) Digital Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

41.

Vollans

(2015) So just what is a trailer, anyway? Arts and the Market 5(2): 112–125.

42.

Vollans

(2017) The most cinematic game yet. Kinephanos: Journal of Media Studies and Popular Culture 7(1): 106–130.

43.

Vollans

Janes

Therrien

, et al. (2017) Introduction: “It’s [not Just] in the Game”: the promotional context of video games. Kinephanos: Journal of Media Studies and Popular Culture 7(1): 1–6.

44.

Williams

(2003) The video game lightning rod. Information, Communication & Society 6(4): 523–550.

45.

Wright

(2017) Marketing authenticity; rockstar games and the use of cinema in video game promotion. Kinephanos: Journal of Media Studies and Popular Culture 7(1): 131–164.

46.

Wright

(2022) Rockstar Games and American History: Promotional Materials and the Construction of Authenticity. De Gruyter Oldenbourg.

47.

Wright

(2023) Paratexts, “Authenticity,” and the margins of digital (game) history. In: Seiwald

Vollans

(eds). (Not) in the Game: History, Paratexts, and Games. De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 33–53.

48.

Young

(2007) The disappearance and reappearance and disappearance of the player in videogame advertising. In: Situated play DIGRA 2007 conference, Tokyo, Japan, 24-28 September 2007, 235–242.

From movie-style marketing to business as usual: The use of cinema(tic) in games promotion 1990-1999

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Why promotion; Why ‘cinematic’?

Methodology

Corpus and analysis

Job adverts

The interconnected meanings of ‘cinematic’

Concluding notes

Footnotes

ORCID iD

Funding

Declaration of conflicting interests

References