Testing Classical Predictors of Public Willingness to Censor on the Desire to Block Fake News Online

Abstract

This study examined media use and attitudinal predictors of public willingness to censor fake online political news among representative samples in Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Tunisia (total N = 2880). The study utilized research on the corrective action hypothesis (CAH) and the theory of presumed media influence (TPMI) as frameworks. The CAH holds that an individual’s belief that media are hostile and influential increases the likelihood that the individual will participate in public discourse urging countermeasures. TPMI maintains that the belief that media are influential is associated with attitudes about media, though those attitudes need not be negative. Perceived exposure to fake news online positively predicted willingness to censor fake news in all countries, aligning with some prior research on both the CAH and the TPMI. Facebook use was negatively associated with willingness to censor fake news in two of the countries, while trust in news media was a positive correlate in two countries. Implications for research on both willingness to censor and on fake news are discussed.

Keywords

Arab region censorship corrective action hypothesis fake news misinformation online news survey theory of presumed media influence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

10 Most Censored Countries (2015) Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) Available at: https://cpj.org/reports/2019/09/10-most-censored-eritrea-north-korea-turkmenistan-journalist.php (31 October 2019).

Abadi

(2017) The words that defined 2017. Business Insider, 12 December Available at: https://www.businessinsider.com/word-of-the-year-2017-12 (accessed 25 April 2021).

Allsop

(2020) A mammoth explosion, tears, and resilient journalism in Beirut. Columbia Journalism Review Available at: https://www.cjr.org/analysis/beirut_explosion_media.php (accessed 25 April 2021).

Amnesty International (2020, May) Tunisia: End prosecution of Emna Chargui, and investigate alarming death and rape threats. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/05/tunisia-end-prosecution-of-emna-chargui-and-investigate-alarming-death-and-rape-threats/ (accessed 25 April 2021).

Barnidge

Rojas

(2014) Hostile media perceptions, presumed media influence, and political talk: Expanding the corrective action hypothesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26(2): 135–156.

Benkler

Faris

Roberts

(2018) Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University press.

Buckley

Chaabi

Ouarda

(2013) Assessment of media development in Tunisia. Available at: file:///Users/jdm711/Downloads/222701eng.pdf (accessed 25 April 2021).

CIA World Factbook Middle East (2019) Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/sa.html (accessed 25 April 2021).

Claes

Beheydt

Lemmens

(2005) Unidimensionality of abbreviated proactive personality scales across cultures. Applied Psychology 54(4): 476–489.

10.

Cohen

Weimann

(2008) Who’s afraid of reality shows? Exploring the effects of perceived influence of reality shows and the concern over their social effects on willingness to censor. Communication Research 35(3): 382–397.

11.

Condis

(2018) Gaming Masculinity: Trolls, Fake Geeks, and the Gendered Battle for Online Culture. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.

12.

Cook

Heilmann

(2013) Two types of self-censorship: Public and private. Political Studies 61(1): 178–196.

13.

Corbu

Oprea

Negrea-Busuioc

, et al. (2020) ‘They can’t fool me, but they can fool the others!’ Third person effect and fake news detection. European Journal of Communication 35: 165–180.

14.

Cut It Out: Censorship in Lebanon (2012, July 12) Retrieved from Carnegie endowment for international peace. Available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/sada/48831 (accessed 25 April 2021).

15.

Davison

(1983) The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly 47(1): 1–15.

16.

Dennis

Martin

Hassan

(2018) Media use in the Middle East, 2018: A Seven-nation Survey. Doha: Northwestern University in Qatar. Available at: www.mideastmedia.org/survey/2018 (accessed 25 April 2021).

17.

Dennis

Martin

Wood

, et al. (2016) Media Use in the Middle East, 2016: A Six-Nation Survey. Doha: Northwestern University in Qatar. Available at: www.mideastmedia.org/survey/2016 (accessed 25 April 2021).

18.

Fisher

Cook

Shirkey

(1994) Correlates of support for censorship of sexual, sexually violent, and violent media. Journal of Sex Research 31(3): 229–240.

19.

Funke

Flamini

(2020) A guide to anti-misinformation actions around the world. Poynter. Available at: https://www.poynter.org/ifcn/anti-misinformation-actions/ (accessed 25 April 2021).

20.

Gavlak

(2021, 25 January) Lebanon must enact drastic reforms to survive, experts say. Voice of America. Available at: https://www.voanews.com/middle-east/lebanon-must-enact-drastic-reforms-survive-economists-say (accessed 25 April 2021).

21.

Hong

(2020) Presumed effects of “fake news” on the global warming discussion in a cross-cultural context. Sustainability 12(5): 2123–2133.

22.

Human Rights Watch (2021, 5 February) Police use violent tactics to quash protests. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/02/05/tunisia-police-use-violent-tactics-quash-protests (accessed 25 April 2021).

23.

Internet censorship listed: How does each country compare? (2012, 16 April) The Guardian. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/datablog/2012/apr/16/internet-censorship-country-list (accessed 25 April 2021).

24.

Jang

Kim

(2018) Third person effects of fake news: Fake news regulation and media literacy interventions. Computers in Human Behavior 80: 295–302.

25.

Lamb

Rashwan

(2020) Saudi court issues final verdicts in Khashoggi killing. The New York Times, 7 September. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/07/world/middleeast/jamal-khashoggi-sentence.html (accessed 25 April 2021).

26.

Lambe

(2002) Dimensions of censorship: Reconceptualizing public willingness to censor. Communication Law & Policy 7(2): 187–235.

27.

Lambe

(2004) Who wants to censor pornography and hate speech? Mass Communication & Society 7(3): 279–299.

28.

Lazer

DMJ

Baum

Benkler

, et al. (2018) The science of fake news. Science 359 (6380): 1094–1096.

29.

Paddon

(2001) Third-person effect, gender differences, pornography exposure and support for restriction of pornography. Asian Journal of Communication 11(1): 120–142.

30.

Martin

Hassan

(2020) News media credibility ratings and perceptions of online fake news exposure in five Arab countries. Journalism Studies 21(16): 2215–2233.

31.

Martin

Martins

Wood

(2016) Desire for cultural preservation as a predictor of support for entertainment media censorship in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Communication 10: 23.

32.

Masri

(2019) Tunisia: An Arab anomaly. Reprint edition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

33.

McLeod

Detenber

Eveland

Jr (2001) Behind the third-person effect: Differentiating perceptual processes for self and other. Journal of Communication 51(4): 678–695.

34.

Mitchell

Barthel

Holcomb

(2016) Many Americans believe fake news is sowing confusion. Pew Research Center, 15 December. Available at: https://www.journalism.org/2016/12/15/many-americans-believe-fake-news-is-sowingconfusion/ (accessed 25 April 2021).

35.

Mitchell

Gottfried

Fedeli

, et al. (2019) Many Americans say made-up news is a critical problem that needs to be fixed. Pew Research Center, 5 June. Available at: https://www.journalism.org/2019/06/05/many-americans-say-made-up-news-is-a-critical-problem-that-needs-to-be-fixed/ (accessed 25 April 2021).

36.

Newman

Fletcher

Kalogeropoulos

, et al. (2018) Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018. Available at: http://media.digitalnewsreport.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/digital-news-report-2018.pdf (accessed 25 April 2021).

37.

Nielsen

Graves

(2017) News you don’t believe: Audience perspectives on fake news. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Available at: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:6eff4d14-bc72-404d-b78a-4c2573459ab8 (accessed 25 April 2021).

38.

Nisbet

Kamenchuk

Dal

(2017) A psychological firewall? Risk perceptions and public support for online censorship in Russia. Social Science Quarterly 98(3): 958–975.

39.

Paek

Lambe

McLeod

(2008) Antecedents to support for content restrictions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 85(2): 273–290.

40.

Pennycook

Cannon

Rand

(2018) Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 147(12): 1865–1880.

41.

Perloff

(2002) The third-person effect. In: Bryant

Zillmann

(eds) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (2nd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

42.

Ram

(2018) Inside Tunisia’s Shams Rad – the Arab world’s only ‘gay radio station’. BBC, 18 June. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-44137901 (accessed 25 April 2021).

43.

Reporters Without Borders (2019) 2019 World Press Freedom Index. Available at: https://rsf.org/en/ranking (accessed 25 April 2021).

44.

Rojas

(2010) “Corrective” actions in the public sphere: How perceptions of media and media effects shape political behaviors. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 22(3): 343–363.

45.

Rojas

Shah

Faber

(1996) For the good of others: Censorship and the third person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 8(2): 163–186.

46.

Rosen

(2002) High school confidential: In their efforts to suppress negative news, administrators are increasingly apt these days to censor student newspapers. American Journalism Review 24(5): 56–61.

47.

Rugh

(2004) Arab Mass Media: Newspapers, Radio, and Television in Arab Politics. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.

48.

Rusbridger

(2018) Breaking News: The Remaking of Journalism and Why It Matters Now. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

49.

Salwen

(1998) Perceptions of media influence and support for censorship: The third-person effect in the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research 25(3): 259–285.

50.

Saudi Arabia bans Al Jazeera in hotels (2017, 9 June) Al Jazeera. Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/06/saudi-arabia-bans-al-jazeera-channels-hotels-170609141041079.html (accessed 25 April 2021).

51.

Schoenbach

Wood

Saeed

(2016) Media industries in the Middle East, 2016. Published by Northwestern University in Qatar and Doha Film Institute Available at: http://www.mideastmedia.org/industry/2016/ (accessed 25 April 2021).

52.

Ştefăniţă

(2018) Fake news and the third-person effect: They are more influenced than me and you. Journal of Media Research 11(3): 5–23.

53.

Swift

(2016) Americans’ trust in mass media sinks to new low. Gallup. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/195542/americans-trust-mass-media-sinks-new-low.aspx (accessed 25 April 2021).

54.

Taber

(2017) The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education 48: 1273–1296.

55.

Tal-Or

Cohen

Tsfati

, et al. (2010) Testing causal direction in the influence of presumed media influence. Communication Research 37(6): 801–824.

56.

Tandoc

Jr Lim

Ling

(2018) Defining “fake news”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism 6(2): 137–153.

57.

Tompros

Crudo

Pfeiffer

, et al. (2017) The constitutionality of criminalizing false speech made on social networking sites in a post-Alvarez, social media-obsessed world. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 31: 65–110.

58.

Tsfati

Cappella

(2003) Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research 30(5): 504–529.

59.

Tsfati

Cohen

Gunther

(2011) The influence of presumed media influence on news about science and scientists. Science Communication 33(2): 143–166.

60.

Ulrichsen

(2020) Qatar and the Gulf Crisis. London: Hurst Publishers.

61.

Wagner

(1982) Simpson’s paradox in real life. The American Statistician 36(1): 46–48.

62.

Walters

(2016) Censorship as a Populist Project: The Politics of Managing Culture in Egypt (Thesis, Georgetown University). Available at: https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/1041837 (accessed 25 April 2021).

63.

Wasserman

Madrid-Morales

(2019) An exploratory study of “fake news” and media trust in Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa. African Journalism Studies 40(1): 107–123.

64.

Wendling

(2018) The (almost) complete history of ‘fake news’. BBC, 22 January. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-42724320 (accessed 25 April 2021).

65.

World Report 2019: Rights trends in Saudi Arabia (2018, 17 December) Human Rights Watch. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2019/country-chapters/saudi-arabia (21 October 2019).