Until relatively recently, processes of health application (app) design have been understudied and this has resulted in a lack of critical reflection on app creation, including curtailing opportunities to share insights and possible pitfalls that could inform best practice in the field. In response, this article contributes to a growing body of literature that addresses this lacuna by exploring the experiences of the research and design team that developed a health app for pregnant women attending a large tertiary hospital in South Australia. Our analysis pays particular attention to the designer–researcher–user nexus exhibited in the ‘co-design’ process and in doing so, draws on Rittel’s notion of ‘wicked problems’. Ultimately, we show that app design is a problem-solving process that is reflective of a high degree of sociality, fluidity, accommodations and compromises.
AduMDMalabuUMalau-AduliA, et al. (2018) Users’ preferences and design recommendations to promote engagements with mobile apps for diabetes self-management: multi-national perspectives. PLoS ONE13(12): e0208942.
2.
AkinolaMHebertLHillB, et al. (2019) Development of a mobile app on contraceptive options for young African American and Latina women. Health Education Behaviour46(1): 89–96.
3.
Al-JaberiH (2018) Developing culturally sensitive MHealth apps for Caribbean immigrant women to use during pregnancy: focus group study. JMIR Hum Factors5(4): e29.
4.
BuchananR (1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues8(2): 5–21.
5.
DaltonJRodgerDWilmoreM, et al. (2014) Who’s afraid? attitudes of midwives to the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) for delivery of pregnancy-related health information. Women and Birth27(3): 168–173.
6.
DaltonJRodgerDWilmoreM, et al. (2018) The Health-e Babies app for antenatal education: feasibility for socially disadvantaged women. PLoS ONE13(5): 1–18.
7.
de JonghTGurol-UrganciIVodopivec-JamsekV, et al. (2012) Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews12: CD007459.
8.
ElsberndAHjermingMVislerC, et al. (2018) Using cocreation in the process of designing a smartphone app for adolescents and young adults with cancer: prototype development study. JMIR Formative Research2(2): e23.
9.
EvansSHClarkeP (2019) Resolving design issues in developing a nutrition app: a case study using formative research. Evaluation and Program Planning72: 97–105.
10.
Garnweidner-HolmeLBorgenIGaritanoI, et al. (2015) Designing and developing a mobile smartphone application for women with gestational diabetes mellitus followed-up at diabetes outpatient clinics in Norway. Healthcare3: 310–323.
11.
GloverV (2013) Maternal depression, anxiety and stress during pregnancy and child outcome; what needs to be done. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology28(1): 25–35.
12.
Guerra-ReyesLChristieVPrabhakarA, et al. (2016) Postpartum health information seeking using mobile phones: experiences of low-income mothers. Maternal and Child Health Journal20(1): 13–21.
13.
HaliliLLiuRHutchinsonKA, et al. (2018) Development and pilot evaluation of a pregnancy-specific mobile health tool: a qualitative investigation of SmartMoms Canada. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making18(1): 95.
14.
KratzkeCCoxC (2012) Smartphone technology and apps: rapidly changing health promotion. International Electronic Journal of Health Education15: 72–82.
15.
LauYChengLJChiC, et al. (2018) Development of a healthy lifestyle mobile app for overweight pregnant women: qualitative study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth6(4): e91.
16.
LuptonD (2017) ‘It just gives me a bit of peace of mind’: Australian women’s use of digital media for pregnancy and early motherhood. Societies7(3): 25.
17.
LuptonDPedersenS (2016) An Australian survey of women’s use of pregnancy and parenting apps. Women and Birth29(4): 368–375.
18.
McClellandGTFitzgeraldM (2018) A participatory mobile application (app) development project with mental health service users and clinicians. Health Education Journal77(7): 815–827.
19.
McQueenD (2001) Strengthening the evidence base for health promotion. Health Promotion International16(3): 261–268.
20.
O’ReillyGSpruijt-MetzD (2013) Current mHealth technologies for physical activity assessment and promotion. American Journal of Preventative Medicine45(4): 501–507.
21.
OgrinRViswanathanRAylenT, et al. (2018) Co-design of an evidence-based health education diabetes foot app to prevent serious foot complications: a feasibility study. Practical Diabetes35(6): 203–209.
22.
PinchTBijkerW (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Sciences3(14): 399–441.
23.
RittelHWebberM1973Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences4: 155–169.
24.
SchwabTLangellJ (2018) Human factors-based mobile application design for global health. Surgical Innovation25(6): 557–562.
25.
StockdaleJSinclairMWisemanH, et al. (2014) The challenge of designing and integrating three motivating, sequential apps for optimising birth after C section. eChallenges e-2014 Conference Proceedings, Belfast, UK, 29–30 October 2014.
26.
SuggsLRatzenS (2012) Global E-health Communication. Handbooks in Communication and Media: The Handbook of Global Health Communication. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
27.
Vodopivec-JamsekVde JonghTGurol-UrganciI, et al. (2012) Mobile phone messaging for preventive health care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews12: CD007457.
28.
WinnerL (1993) Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology and Human Values18(3): 362–378.
29.
WuJTomborIShahabLWestR (2017) Usability testing of a smoking cessation smartphone application (‘SmokeFree Baby’): a think-aloud study with pregnant smokers. Digital Health3: 1–9.
