Connecting to nature through tech? The case of the iNaturalist app

Abstract

Self-defined as ‘an online social network of people sharing biodiversity information to help each other learn about nature’, iNaturalist is a mobile application whose primary goal is ‘to connect people to nature’, closely followed by the secondary goal of ‘generating scientifically valuable biodiversity data from these personal encounters’, which the founders believe can be achieved simultaneously with the primary goal in a self-reinforcing logic. Following an approach informed by media studies on wildlife photography and film, and science and technology studies as well as insights from interviews with users and participant observation in the Los Angeles area, this article makes the case that mobile applications such as iNaturalist sit at a tension because while they can ignite interest in the natural environment, they also prescriptively describe and normalize a ‘nature’ and an epistemology that are particular to the natural sciences.

Keywords

Animals Instagram mobile media nature spectacle taxonomy wildlife photography

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armbruster

(1998) Creating the world we must save: the paradox of television nature documentaries. In: Kerridge

Sammells

(eds) Writing the Environment: Ecocriticism and Literature. London and New York: Zed Books, pp. 218–238.

Baker

(1993) Picturing the Beast: Animals, Identity, and Representation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Baker

(2000) Postmodern Animal. London: Reaktion Books.

Benson

(2010) Wired wilderness: Technologies of tracking and the making of modern wildlife. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Berger

(1991) About Looking (1st Vintage International ed). New York: Vintage International.

Bowker

(2005) Memory Practices in the Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Brigida

(2011) 25+ Nature and wildlife mobile apps. In: The National Wildlife Federation Blog. Available at: http://blog.nwf.org/2011/08/the-best-wildlife-and-nature-iphone-and-android-apps/ (accessed 7 December 2017).

Brower

(2005) “Take only photographs”: animal photography’s construction of nature love. Invisible Culture: An Electronic Version for Visual Culture 9. Available at: https://www.rochester.edu/in_visible_culture/Issue_9/issue9_brower.pdf.

Brower

(2011) Developing Animals: Wildlife and Early American Photography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

10.

Burt

(2002) Animals in Film. London: Reaktion Books.

11.

Burt

(2005) John Berger’s “why look at animals?”: a close reading. Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology 9(2): 203–218.

12.

Byrne

Wolch

(2009) Nature, race, and parks: past research and future directions for geographic research. Progress in Human Geography 33(6): 743–765.

13.

Chris

(2006) Watching Wildlife. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

14.

Cohn

(2008) Citizen science: can volunteers do real research? BioScience 58(3): 192–197.

15.

Cooper

(2016) Citizen Science: How Ordinary People Are Changing the Face of Discovery. New York: The Overlook Press.

16.

Cronon

(1995) The trouble with wilderness: or, getting back to the wrong nature. In: Cronon

(ed) Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature. New York: W.W. Norton, pp. 69–90.

17.

Daston

Galison

(1992) The image of objectivity. Representations 40(40): 81–128.

18.

Debord

(1967) The Society of the Spectacle. New York: Zone Books.

19.

Dickinson

Shirk

Bonter

, et al. (2012) The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(6): 291–297.

20.

Dickinson

Zuckerberg

Bonter

(2010) Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41(1): 149–172.

21.

Eveleth

(2015) How many photographs of you are out there in the world?. The Atlantic, 2 November [online]. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/11/how-many-photographs-of-you-are-out-there-in-the-world/413389/ (accessed 17 March 2020).

22.

Fowles

(1979) Seeing nature whole. Harpers 259(1554): 49–68.

23.

Global Biodiversity Information Facility (n.d.) What is GBIF? Available at: https://www.gbif.org/what-is-gbif (accessed 25 May 2018).

24.

Haraway

(1991) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In: Haraway

(ed) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, pp. 183–201.

25.

Haraway

(2003) The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

26.

Haraway

(2008) When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

27.

iNaturalist (2016) About. Available at: http://www.inaturalist.org/pages/about (accessed 20 February 2017).

28.

iNaturalist (n.d. a) Observations. Available at: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?place_id=962&subview=table&view=observers (accessed 25 May 2018).

29.

iNaturalist (n.d. b) People. Available at: https://www.inaturalist.org/people (accessed 24 May 2018).

30.

Iwane

and iNaturalist (2017) The (super) official iNat blog. Available at: http://inaturalist.tumblr.com/?og=1 (accessed 6 May 2017).

31.

Iwane

iNaturalist (2018) Citizen science and iNaturalist at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. In: iNaturalist. Available at: https://www.inaturalist.org/blog/14303-citizen-science-and-inaturalist-at-the-natural-history-museum-of-los-angeles-county (accessed 25 May 2018).

32.

Jabr

(2017) Letter of recommendation: iNaturalist. The New York Times Magazine, 10 December 2017, pp. 30–32.

33.

Jeffries

(2003) BBC natural history versus science paradigms. Science as Culture 12(4): 527–545.

34.

Latimer

Miele

(2013) Naturecultures? Science, affect and the non-human. Theory, Culture & Society 30(7–8): 5–31.

35.

Latour

(1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

36.

Law

Lynch

(1998) Lists, field guides and the descriptive organization of seeing: birdwatching as an exemplary observational activity. Human Studies 11(2/3): 271–303.

37.

Lister

(2019) 33 Mind-boggling Instagram stats & facts for 2018 [online] . Wordstream . Available at: https://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2017/04/20/instagram-statistics (accessed 17 March 2020).

38.

McKibben

(1997) Curbing nature’s paparazzi. Harper’s Magazine 295(1770): 19–24. 1 November.

39.

McKibben

(2006) The End of Nature. New York: Random House.

40.

Mills

(2017) Animals on Television: The Cultural Making of the Non-Human. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

41.

Mitman

(2012) Reel Nature: America’s Romance with Wildlife on Film. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

42.

Nicolson

(1997) Mountain Gloom and Mountain Glory: The Development of the Aesthetics of the Infinite. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

43.

O’Neill

(1993) Science, wonder and the lust of the eyes. Journal of Applied Philosophy 10(2): 139–146.

44.

Price

(2005) Thirteen ways of seeing nature in LA. In: Deverell

Hise

(eds) Land of Sunshine: An Environmental History of Metropolitan Los Angeles. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 220–244.

45.

Schultz

(2002) Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In: Schmuck

Schultz

(eds) Psychology of Sustainable Development. Boston, MA: Springer, pp. 61–78.

46.

Scott

(2003) Popularizing science and nature programming: the role of “spectacle” in contemporary wildlife documentary. Journal of Popular Film and Television 31(1): 29–35.

47.

Silvertown

(2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24(9): 467–471.

48.

Stormer

(2004) Addressing the sublime: space, mass representation, and the unpresentable. Critical Studies in Media Communication 21(3): 212–240.

49.

Williams

(2014) Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. England: Oxford University Press.

50.

Wynn

(2017) Citizen Science in the Digital Age. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.

51.

Yoon

(2009) Naming Nature: The Clash Between Instinct and Science. New York: W.W. Norton.

52.

Zelenski

Nisbet

(2014) Happiness and feeling connected: The distinct role of nature relatedness. Environment and Behavior 46(1): 3–23.