BarrettLFAdolphRMarsellaS, et al. (2019) Emotional expressions reconsidered: Challenges to inferring emotion from human facial movements. Psychological Science in the Public Interest20(1): 1–68.
2.
BuolamwiniJGebruT (2018) Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In: Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, pp. 77–91. Available at: http://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html (accessed 7 February 2019).
3.
CrawfordKPaglenT (2019) Excavating AI: The politics of images in machine learning training sets. Available at: https://www.excavating.ai (accessed 7 February 2019).
4.
D’IgnazioCKleinL (2019) Data Feminism. Strong Ideas. Cambridge: MIT Press.
5.
EubanksV (2018) Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
6.
FoucaultM (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Colleège de France, 1978-79, MichelSenellart (ed), GrahamBurchell (Transl.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
GitelmanL (ed) (2013) Raw Data Is an Oxymoron. Cambridge: MIT Press.
8.
HarawayD (1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies14(3): 575–599.
LoshEMWernimontJ (eds) (2018) Bodies of Information: Intersectional Feminism and Digital Humanities. Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11.
NobleSU (2018) Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: NYU Press.