A key dimension of young children’s mobile media engagement and play centres on their embodied relations, and how these are shaped with and through the interfaces, materiality and mobility of haptic media. This article explores these embodied dimensions of young children’s mobile media use, drawing on research from (1) ethnographic observation of young children’s play practices in family homes, (2) analysis of videos of young children’s tactile media interaction shared on YouTube and (3) analysis of user interface (UI) and mobile app developer literature, such as the ‘Event Handling Guide for iOS’, which encodes touchscreen interaction through the design constraints and possibilities of gesture input techniques. Taking as its starting point Marcel Mauss’ famous reflection on body techniques, this article draws on past and present research on mobile technologies, tactility and everyday life, to explore what might be involved in developing a ‘cultural phenomenology’ of mobile touchscreens. This research and analysis reveals the emergence of what we term a haptic habitus or cultivation of embodied dispositions for touchscreen conduct and competence.
AclandCR (ed) (2007) Residual Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
2.
ApperleyTH (2013) The body of the gamer: Game art and gestural excess. Digital Creativity24(2): 145–156.
3.
BourdieuP (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BuckleitnerW (2011) A taxonomy of multi-touch interaction styles, by stage. Children’s Technology Review18(11): 10–11.
5.
ChiongCShulerC (2010) Learning: Is There an App for That? Investigations of Young Children’s Usage and Learning with Mobile Devices and Apps. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
6.
ClucasS (2000) Cultural phenomenology and the everyday. Critical Quarterly42(1): 8–34.
7.
ConnorS (2000) Making an issue of cultural phenomenology. Critical Quarterly42(1): 2–6.
8.
CramerFFullerM (2008) Interface. In: FullerM (ed) Software Studies: A Lexicon. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 149–153.
9.
CsordasTJ (1999) Embodiment and cultural phenomenology. In: WeissGHaberHF (eds) Perspectives on Embodiment: The Intersections of Nature and Culture. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 143–162.
10.
CristiaASeidlA (2015) Parental reports on touch screen use in early childhood. PLoS One10(6): 1–20.
11.
GallowayAR (2012) The Interface Effect. Cambridge: Polity.
12.
IhdeD (1990) Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
13.
IhdeD (1993) Postphenomenology: Essays in the Postmodern Context. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
14.
IntronaLDIlharcoFM (2004) The ontological screening of contemporary life: A phenomenological analysis of screens. European Journal of Information Systems13: 221–234.
15.
HighmoreB (2011) Ordinary Lives: Studies in the Everyday. London: Routledge.
16.
HjorthLHorstHGallowayA. (eds) (2017) The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography. New York: Routledge.
17.
HourcadeJPMascherSLWuD. (2015) Look, my baby is using an iPad! An analysis of YouTube videos of infants and toddlers using tablets. In: Proceedings of CHI 15, New York, ACM Press, pp. 1915–1924.
18.
LokeLRobertsonT (2011) The lived body in design: Mapping the terrain. In: Proceedings of OZCHI ‘11, New York, ACM Press, pp. 181–184.
19.
McCarthyJWrightP (2004) Technology as experience. Interactions11(5), September-October, 42–43.
NansenBJayemanneD (2016) Infants, interfaces, and intermediation: Digital parenting in the production of ‘iPad Baby’ YouTube videos. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media60(4): 587–603.
26.
NansenBVetereFDownsJ. (2014) Reciprocal habituation: A study of older people and the Kinect. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (ToCHI)21(3), Article 18: 1–20.
27.
NevskiESiibakA (2016) The role of parents and parental mediation on 0-3-year olds’ digital play with smart devices: Estonian parents’ attitudes and practices. Early Years: An International Research Journal36(3): 227–241.
28.
NormanD (2010) Natural user interfaces are not natural. Interactions17(3), May–June, 6–10.
29.
OfCom (2013) Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report. London: OfCom.
30.
ParisiD (2015) A counterrevolution in the hands: The console controller as an ergonomic branding mechanism. Journal of Games Criticism2(1). Available at: http://gamescriticism.org/articles/parisi-2-1 (accessed 31 January 2018).
31.
ParisiDPatersonMArcherJE (2017) Haptic media studies. New Media & Society19(10): 1513–1522.
PinkSHorstHPostillJ. (2016) Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. Los Angeles: Sage.
35.
RichardsonI (2008) Pocket technospaces: The bodily incorporation of mobile media. In: GogginG (ed), Mobile Phone Cultures. New York: Routledge, pp. 66–76.
36.
RichardsonI (2012) Touching the screen: A phenomenology of mobile gaming and the iPhone. In: HjorthLBurgessJRichardsonI (eds), Studying Mobile Media: Cultural Technologies, Mobile Communication, and the iPhone. New York: Routledge, pp. 133–151.
37.
RichardsonIHjorthL (2017) Mobile media, domestic play and haptic ethnography. New Media & Society19(10): 1653–1667.
38.
RichardsonIThirdA (2009) Cultural phenomenology and the material culture of mobile media. In: VanniniP (ed), Material Culture and Technology in Everyday Life: Ethnographic Approaches. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 145–156.
39.
RichardsonIWilkenR (2009) Haptic vision, footwork, place-making: A peripatetic phenomenology of the mobile phone pedestrian. Second Nature: International Journal of Creative Media2(1): 22–41.
40.
RichardsonIWilkenR (2017) Mobile media and mediation: The relational ontology of Google Glass. In: MarkhamTRodgersS (eds) Conditions of Mediation: Phenomenological Perspectives on Media. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 113–123.
41.
RideoutV (2013) Zero to Eight: Children’s Media Use in America 2013. San Francisco: Common Sense Media.
